Plan Sponsors See Recession in Three Years, Lower Targets

A significant majority of corporate and healthcare defined benefit plan sponsors say they expect a recession within the next three years, and have accordingly lowered their long-term return assumptions, according to a survey from investment consulting firm NEPC.

The survey questioned plan sponsors’ economic outlook, use of risk reduction strategies, and how they will change their asset allocation and investment strategies in the coming year. It found that 84% of those polled believe a recession will likely occur during the next three years, half of whom expect a recession in just 12 to 18 months.

Because of these recessionary concerns, 58% of defined benefit plan sponsors are bearish on the stock market, and 63% believe discount rates may be the same or lower over the next 12 months. They are relatively equally divided about what they believe is the greatest threat to their portfolios as 30% named geopolitical tensions, 29% said political uncertainty, and 28% said Federal Reserve action.

The survey indicated that the funded status of plans has improved since 2017 with some 60% of plans having a funded ratio higher than 90% in 2019, up from just 46% two years ago. This is happening in an environment where corporate pensions are experiencing increased costs and falling discount rates.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

NEPC said better-funded plans have embraced liability-driven investing (LDI), glide paths, and liability reduction strategies. Approximately 75% of plans with a funded status above 90% have used LDI, and two-thirds have 40% or less of their assets allocated to equity. Among plans that use LDI, 44% have an allocation of 51% or higher, compared to just 37% in 2017, and 9% in 2011.

“The correlation between strong funded status and the use of LDI illustrates that risk management in the form of LDI works to reduce funded status volatility in a declining interest rate environment,” Brad Smith, a partner in NEPC’s Corporate Defined Benefit Group, said in a release. “While the use of LDI has remained consistent with prior years, we’ve found that the allocations to LDI have increased significantly over the past two years and are a key contributor to protecting funded status in this market environment.”

The survey also found that plan sponsors have significantly lowered their long-term return assumptions with one-third of the respondents having a return assumption of 6% or less, compared to just 20% in 2017. The number of plan sponsors with a return assumption of 7.5% or more has declined to 21% from 33% two years ago.

Alternative investment strategies remain popular, according to the survey, with 65% of respondents having an allocation in that category in 2019. Among plan sponsors who are actively investing in alternatives, 40% are in hedge funds, 38% invest in private equity, and 33% allocate to real assets.

The percentage of surveyed plan sponsors incorporating ESG strategies in their portfolio has nearly doubled from 6% in 2018 to 11% in 2019. That interest appears to be waning, however, as only 16% of plan sponsors said they are considering ESG, down from 28% in 2018.

The survey also found the number of plan sponsors who believe they may eventually terminate their plans in the future has nearly doubled in two years. It showed 23% of respondents saying they were unsure if they will stay open, up from 12% in 2017.

About 15% said they are planning a full plan termination, and 35% say it may occur over the next five to seven years. And 22% said they considered plan termination but rejected it, with 78% of those citing annuity purchase costs as the reason not to terminate.

If the Rich Think a Recession Is Coming …

60% of Americans Think a Recession Likely Will Hit in 2020

Tags: LDI, NEPC, Plan Sponsors, recession, Survey

An advocacy group is urging President Donald Trump to cancel anticipated investments from the federal Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) into the MSCI All-Country World Index, which would indirectly fund Chinese state-owned companies, the organization alleges.

The MSCI index has 6% of its portfolio invested in the stocks of corporations based in China, according to a statement from the Committee on the Present Danger: China. The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board voted to “mirror” this particular MSCI index starting next year.

The group finds this action unacceptable due to national security concerns connected with funding state-owned Chinese companies linked to the country’s Communist Party.

By funding such companies, the committee argues, the investments are “enabling Beijing to: violate US sanctions; illegally build and militarily fortify islands in the South China Sea; monitor, incarcerate, and repress its own and other nations’ religious minorities and ordinary citizens; engage in surveillance state practices, digital totalitarianism and “social credit” scoring; conduct cyberattacks and intellectual property theft; and construct advanced weapon systems with which to inflict murderous damage on this country and its men and women in uniform.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

Bipartisan legislation was recently introduced that would prohibit the TSP from following through with the MSCI Index investment. “America’s investors should never be a source of wealth funding Beijing’s rise at the expense of our nation’s future prosperity,” Senator Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, one of the sponsors of the legislation, said in a statement.

“It is totally unacceptable for our veterans and those serving in uniform today to invest in Chinese companies building weapons designed to kill them or their comrades-in-arms,” the group said.

Critics of such opinion argue that across-the-board portfolio limits on investing in Chinese firms will harm the US.

“I would be much more comfortable with the US blocking the Thrift board from investing in particular entities that may be complicit in a human rights violation or that has stolen technology rather than saying the Thrift board can’t invest in China,” said Derek Scissors, a China expert at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the governing body of one of the biggest federal worker retirement programs. “The US government shouldn’t be involved in across-the-board bans.”

According to Bloomberg, the Trump administration wants to force stock indices to drop firms that the administration considers a material risk to US investors.

Endowments and Foundations Sticking It Out with China

Retirement Funds Are in the Crosshairs of US-China Conflict

Tags: China, communist, Donald Trump, federal pension, msci index, national security, thrift savings board