Plan Sponsors Look to Drop Liabilities Like Bad Habits

More than 90% of corporate DB plans with de-risking goals say they expect to divest all their plan liabilities in the next five years.

The pension risk transfer (PRT) market is expected to be “robust for years to come,” according to a MetLife report that says the current interest rate environment, market volatility, an increase in retirees, and improved annuity buyout pricing are driving de-risking interest among corporate defined benefit (DB) pension plan sponsors.

Companies are increasingly looking to reduce some or all of their pension plan’s liabilities—and the risks that come with them—by offering lump-sum distributions to participants and/or by using an annuity buyout to transfer pension liabilities to an insurer, the report finds.

While the overall PRT market grew by more than 25% between 2017 and 2019, according to Willis Towers Watson, MetLife says there is still $3.4 trillion in plan assets held by private-sector DB plans, the majority of which is expected to be de-risked within the next decade.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

According to the MetLife report, 93% of plan sponsors with de-risking goals say they expect to completely divest all their plan liabilities in the next five years, which is up sharply from the 76% that had the same expectations in 2019. Among plan sponsors that expect to fully divest their defined benefit plan liabilities, 32% have plan assets of $1 billion or more, 35% have assets of $500 million to $999 million, and 33% have assets of $100 million to $499 million.

The Milliman Pension Buyout Index, which estimates the average cost of a pension risk transfer strategy, shows that it has become increasingly affordable to de-risk a pension plan over the past decade. According to the index’s most recent results, for August, the estimated cost to transfer retiree pension risk to an insurer was 102.2%, down from 103.2% during the same month a year earlier, and down from 111.4% in 2010. This means the estimated retiree PRT cost for the month is 2.2% more than those plans’ retiree accumulated benefit obligation.

The decreasing costs of risk transfers were reflected in the $5 billion in US single premium buy-out sales recorded during the second quarter of the year—a 119% jump from the same period last year, according to the Secure Retirement Institute (SRI).

Total single premium buy-out assets increased 9% for the quarter to $169.4 billion, while buy-in assets totaled $5.9 billion, which is more than 214% higher than it was the same quarter last year. The SRI also said overall group annuity risk transfer sales were $9 billion in the first half of 2021, a 30% increase compared with the first half of 2020.

Related Stories:

Special Report: Will Pension Risk Transfers Someday Control All DB Plans?

­Milliman Launches Index to Track Pension Risk Transfer Market

Special Report: How to Ensure a Smooth Pension Risk Transfer

Tags: , , , , , , ,

What If Cathie Wood’s Deflation Really Arrives? Now There’s an Antidote

Besides the celebrated money manager, few predict an upcoming era of falling prices, which a new ETF aims to buffer against.


Cathie Wood is a lonely apostate where consumer prices are concerned. The head of Ark Invest, an avid devotee of disruptive technology, ardently believes that deflation lies ahead. This puts her at odds with most of Wall Street, to say the least.

But now, just in case she and a handful of other deflation prognosticators are right, there’s a new investment vehicle to hedge against down-spiraling prices. The same firm that has attracted billions of dollars to its inflation-hedging product, Quadratic Capital Management, is launching a sibling that seeks to create a product against the polar opposite.

The Quadratic Deflation exchange-traded fund (ETF) is using options to protect its investors if deflation makes a return visit to the US economy, which last happened during the Great Depression. At a time when all investors can talk about is inflation, though, the deflation ETF hasn’t torn up the track. Since its mid-September start, as of Friday’s close, the ETF has lost 3.6%.

The fund’s alter-ego, the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF, has risen around 8% starting from its mid-2019 debut, with investment inflow this year of $2.4 billion.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“Some investors have expressed concerns that the US will experience an environment similar to Japan, given the debt increase and labor market,” said Nancy Davis, Quadratic’s chief investment officer, in a statement. “It’s prudent for investors to have tools available to them so that they are prepared for a wide range of economic outcomes and environments.”

The investment community is understandably fixated on inflation. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) grew a hot 5.3% in August, compared with 12 months prior. The CPI for September will be released on Wednesday, and Wall Street expects a slightly smaller—albeit still elevated—number than the August one.

The Federal Reserve has depicted the current inflationary surge as a temporary problem mainly linked to pandemic-driven supply chain snarls. “I’m comfortable in thinking that these are elevated prices and that they will be coming down as supply bottlenecks are addressed,” Chicago Fed President Charles Evans told CNBC last week.

Quadratic believes that deflationary forces will return if this spell of higher inflation abates. Automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and job offshoring are key factors that could bring about this long-anticipated downward slide in prices, the firm thinks.

That resembles Wood’s point of view. “Innovation has never been in this place before,” she said in a recent talk. But where the Fed and others fear that deflation would augur an economic slump, as happened in the 1930s, Wood contended that the deflation she sees coming will super-charge economic growth by dramatically boosting productivity.

The last period of huge innovation that transformed society took hold in the early 1900s, she said, with three key drivers: automobiles, electricity, and the telephone. Today, she continued, there are five such propellants: robotics, DNA sequencing, enhanced energy storage, AI, and blockchain technology.

Related Stories:

Cathie Wood: The Big Risk Is Deflation, Not Inflation

Forget about Inflation, Deflation Is the Real Threat, BofA Says

3 Inflation Scenarios: How Bad Could It Get?

Tags: , , , , , ,

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.