Pitcairn Family Office Names Sonnenberg as New CIO

Family office Pitcairn, which caters to ultra-high-net-worth families, announced Nathan Sonnenberg as its new CIO. He succeeds Rick Pitcairn, who will take on the newly created role of chief global strategist after serving nearly 15 years in the position.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

Sonnenberg is responsible for Pitcairn’s investment platform strategy and developing and communicating investment strategy and policies. He also directs analysis, portfolio management, research and risk management. According to the announcement, he will focus on day-to-day management of the investment team, along with building the firm’s long-term capital framework and finding new investments within private markets.

Meanwhile, Rick Pitcairn now oversees the development of the family office’s thought leadership on macro-economic trends, as well as opportunities and new initiatives to increase business growth. He is tasked with leading the firm’s global growth strategy, working directly with clients and producing original research and insights on macroeconomic trends for clients and the media. Both will report to Leslie Voth, Pitcairn’s chair, CEO and president.

“I am looking forward to working closely with Nathan, and [I] continue to support our client families,” Pitcairn said in a release. “Having worked with Nathan for the past several years, I know that he is not only a smart and highly experienced investment professional, but he also shares our values and commitment to doing what’s best for our clients.”

Prior to Pitcairn, Sonnenberg was founder of Vienna, Virginia-based outsourced-CIO consultancy Wealth Management Consulting. He has also served as director of investments for Wells Fargo’s Abbot Downing—now called Wells Fargo Private Bank—and before that, he was CIO at financial services firm Fortigent.

“I want to thank Leslie and Rick for this incredible opportunity,” Sonnenberg said. “Over my many years working with Pitcairn, I have seen firsthand how they deliver personalized portfolios for every client family.”

Sonnenberg has been named to Pitcairn’s leadership team and investment policy committee, will be based in Washington, D.C. and will build out a capital-region team. He will also spend time in the firm’s Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, headquarters.

According to the firm, the hiring of Sonnenberg and new role creation for Rick Pitcairn is part of the family office’s plans to expand its client base and investment offerings. Pitcairn, which was founded in 1923 as the family office for the Pitcairn family, has more than 100 families as clients.

“These moves build on our decades of investment excellence and will ensure that our ultra-high-net-worth clients continue to receive the trusted investment counsel and sophisticated opportunities they deserve,” said Voth in the release.

Related Stories:

Swiss Re, Mercer UK Name New CIOs

MassMutual Names New CIO

Pennsylvania PSERS Names New CIO, Tapping UAW Investment Official

Tags: chief investment officers, CIO, Family Offices, Leslie Voth, Nathan Sonnenberg, Pitcairn, Rick Pitcairn, Wealth Management Consulting

This story has been updated.

Why should corporate employers keep those fuddy-duddy old defined benefit pension plans around when they can simply offer defined contributions that transfer risks to workers and don’t have as many regulatory burdens?

Because DB plans today are a better deal for plan sponsors, according to a study by Jared Gross, head of institutional portfolio strategy, and Michael Buchenholz, head of U.S. pension strategy, at J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

They declare that “the pension industry appears to have developed a collective blind spot” about DB plans, believing they offer little value. This blind spot, they say, is rooted in “dated assumptions, such as the notion that DB plans represent a disposable, noncore business that sponsors would be better off without.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

DB plans have long since recovered from the disaster they suffered from the global financial crisis of 2008 and 20090, when their ability to meet obligations, called funded status, tumbled. Despite a punishing time for investments last year, the average U.S. corporate pension funded status stood at 106.3% as of early November 2022, by the reckoning of MetLife Investment Management.

This has produced a whole host of advantages to sponsors and beneficiaries alike, Gross and Buchenholz contend. The upshot is that DB plans closed to new hires should be reopened, in their view.

The JPM study is echoed by a similar conclusion from Zorast Wadia, principal and consulting actuary at consulting firm Milliman. Among other things, he notes that 2021 federal legislation, the American Rescue Plan Act, boosts DB plans via ensuring that interest rates for them will not dip below 5%, thus padding their income.

DC plans have an unappreciated downside, the authors write: The employer match grows most years, as beneficiaries’ salaries increase. As they put it, “DC contributions must be fully funded by the sponsor—in cash, every year— while DB benefits can be fully or partially self-financed through a combination of returns on existing assets and a more flexible contribution framework.” Gross and Buchenholz calculate that a typical DC plan over 10 years will cost an employer $20 million, but a DB plan will cost just 15% of that.

DB plans, on the other hand, generate surplus returns that a company can make use of, even though they can’t spend it, they reason. Indeed, if a company creams off that surplus, when the funded status is above 100%, there’s trouble: Such a maneuver, called a reversion, triggers a heavy 50% tax penalty.

But wise sponsors can instead gain from keeping the surplus on the balance sheet as a cushion against funded status volatility. More important, the authors say, surpluses “can be used to finance new liabilities, serve as a currency in mergers and acquisitions, or pay for retiree medical costs.”

Rising interest rates are favorable to DB plans, as they reduce liabilities much faster than they do assets, per the JPM strategists. Higher rates do that through reducing the future value of asset earnings by, among other factors, increasing the cost of borrowing.

DB programs also help in the competition for employees, they say, who see a nice traditional pension as a form of income. Even young people, who expect to jump to other jobs, can gain a benefit. After all, if they stick around for five years—not a huge amount of time—they typically can be fully vested in a DB plan.