PGIM CEO Eyes Public Pensions as Next Financial Crisis

Hunt points to funding difficulties due to lawmakers setting obligations.

Troubles with funded ratios, reforms, and the en masse retirement of the baby boomer generation waiting in the wings, it appears that the next financial crisis could be the collapse of the public pension system, according to PGIM CEO David Hunt.

“If you were going to look for what’s the possible real crack in the financial architecture for the next crisis, rather than looking in the rearview mirror, pension funds would be on our list,” Hunt told Bloomberg, adding that a downturn under a local tax revenue decline and a higher unemployment rate will put more pressure on states and municipalities to meet benefit obligations, which he said PGIM is “worried about.”

According to a report by the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College, US public pensions only had 71.8% of assets required to meet obligations to their retired members as of fiscal 2016.  Should the funds return 7.6% annually, the CRR expects them to be at around 73% in 2021.

In comparison, corporate pension plans tend to fare better than public ones. According to Wilshire Consulting, the average US corporate pension plan was 88.4% funded in January.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

States such as Illinois, New Jersey, and Kentucky have all had issues with their funded liabilities, with lawmakers continuing to struggle to find a solution to a potential crisis.

Hunt, whose firm manages $1.2 trillion worth of assets for Prudential Financial, noted that while it’s tougher for public pensions to stay funded due to lawmakers setting the obligations for fund managers to meet, he suggested they take a page out of the corporate pension playbook and “find ways to minimize the deficit and to take risk gradually off the table” to meet their promises.

Tags: , , ,

AZ Judge, Politician Pension Could Get Funding via Judicial Fee Bump

Employer contribution increase, COLA reductions are also being discussed.

A House-approved bill could help preserve the Arizona Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan (EORP) by hiking up judicial fees for state residents, AZCentral reports.

Voted in favor by the House Banking and Insurance Committee Monday (a 7-1 landslide), HB 2564 aims to boost 55 Superior Court and 15 justice base court fees while slightly reducing the distribution formulas for domestic-violence, child abuse prevention, and county general services. Should the bill become a law, fees will increase from $2 to $18, subject to which court service is used.

According to Supreme Court Government Affairs Director Jerry Landau, the bill will rake in a maximum $2.5 million for the EORP. As for the reduced formulas, Landau noted that the social services revenue will not be affected due to the raised fees.

The single “no” vote came from Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, who, according to AZCentral, felt that all the bill did was try to fix the politician and judge pension’s funding problem with hidden taxes.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Other ideas being considered by the legislature was raising employer contributions to roughly 61% and reducing cost-of-living benefits from 4% to 2%.

Last year, a percentage of court fees contributed $8.6 million to the EORP, which is managed by the $9 billion Public Safety Personnel Retirement System, which also handles the pensions of corrections officers. However, lavish benefits (which allow some elected officials to collect more money in retirement than they made in office) combined with poor investment decisions, questionable court rulings, and odd legislative decisions (possible solutions being thrown out in court) have caused the EORP to suffer. According to AZCentral, the fund could go bankrupt in under 10 years.

Tags: , , ,

«