Peru Increases Cap on Pension Investment Internationally

Peru's four pension funds are seeking to invest more abroad and will likely ask Congress to change a law that set a 30% ceiling.

(July 16, 2010) — Peru’s central bank upped the limit today on how much private pension funds can invest abroad to 28% from 26% previously, allowing funds to invest an additional $500 million in foreign markets.

Alejandro Perez-Reyes, investment manager at Peru’s second-largest private pension fund AFP Prima, told Bloomberg that funds may additionally ask Congress to alter a law that set a 30% cap on the amount that private pension funds can invest in foreign markets.

“We need to diversify our investments, as it’s risky to have everything in the same basket,” Perez-Reyes, who oversees $7.8 billion, told the news service. “The bank will raise the limit as soon as we’re near the current ceiling,” he added.

Peru’s four pension funds have to date invested 23.6% of their portfolio abroad, mainly in stocks, according to Bloomberg.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The country’s private pensions, which have been developing steadily in Peru partly by taking advantage of strong local markets, set a lofty goal of doubling the volume of their assets under management over the next six years. The assets managed by the four companies that operate in the system are expected to hit $50 billion by 2016, up from the current $26 billion.

In related news, Peru’s economy expanded at the second-fastest pace in 19 months in May, boosted by a recovery in private investment, with output growing 9.2% in May from the same month a year earlier.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Goldman Gains After Paying Record $550 Million to Settle SEC Lawsuit

Of the lawsuit's total penalty, the largest ever paid by a Wall Street firm, $15 million represents disgorgement of gains from the deal while the remaining is a civil penalty.

(July 16, 2010) — After Goldman Sachs Group agreed to pay $550 million to settle a civil  fraud suit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the bank’s shares surged in early trading Friday.

“This settlement is a stark lesson to Wall Street firms that no product is too complex, and no investor too sophisticated, to avoid a heavy price if a firm violates the fundamental principles of honest treatment and fair dealing,” Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in a statement. The charges, filed April 16, had pushed the firm’s market value down by more than $25 million at one point.

The suit charged Goldman of deceiving clients by selling mortgage securities that were secretly designed by a hedge-fund firm to cash in on the housing market’s collapse. The settlement may mean the SEC could now divert its attention to other Wall Street firms, such as Morgan Stanley, J.P Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and UBS, as Goldman was not the only bank to structure and market risky products as the US housing market was beginning to falter.

“The SEC is continuing to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the US housing market as it was beginning to show signs of distress,” Kenneth Lench, chief of the SEC’s Structured and New Products Unit, said in a release.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

While Goldman acknowledged that marketing materials for its Paulson-constructed collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) were ‘incomplete,’ the bank settled the SEC charges without admitting or denying the allegations. Goldman Sachs agreed in the settlement to “reform its business practices,” the statement said.

Despite the bank ridding itself of the SEC suit, which represented a major risk hanging over the stock, Goldman still faces continued scrutiny and a number of other lawsuits relating to its actions surrounding the financial crisis. For example, the Royal Bank of Scotland said it may seek to recover hundreds and millions of dollars from Goldman in addition to the $100 million it received as part of the $550 million settlement.

Many analysts say the blow to Goldman’s reputation may be even harder to recoup. “Reputation risk is the biggest issue in our view,” Citigroup analyst Keith Horowitz wrote in a note to clients earlier this year, the AP reported.

Earlier this month, Goldman asked a judge to combine 18 shareholder lawsuits it faces.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«

You have 0 free articles remaining

Become a Washington Technology Insider today!
Already an Insider? Login here