Pension Fund Assets in Largest Markets Rise 11% in 2020

A second straight year of double-digit growth boosted global pension asset values to $52.5 trillion.


Pension fund assets within the world’s 22 largest markets saw double-digit gains for the second straight year in 2020, climbing 11% to $52.5 trillion, according to the 2021 “Global Pension Assets Study” from Willis Towers Watson’s Thinking Ahead Institute.

“In what was a highly tumultuous year, pension funds continued to grow strongly in 2020, underpinned by ongoing multi-decade themes such as the rotation from equities to alternatives and the growth of DC [defined contribution], now the dominant global pensions model,” Marisa Hall, co-head of the Thinking Ahead Institute, said in a statement.

Over the past five, 10, and 20 years, those assets have seen average annualized returns of 8.0%, 6.2%, and 6.1%, respectively, up from 5.3%, 6.5%, and 5.4%, respectively, over the same time periods last year.

The US continued its dominance as the world’s largest pension market, representing 62% of worldwide pension assets, down slightly from 62.5% in 2019, and up from 52.6% in 2010. Japan was a distant second with 6.9%, down from 7.2% the previous year, followed by the UK with 6.8%, which was down from 7.4% in 2019. The seven largest markets for pension assets, which also include Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, account for 92% of the assets in the 22 largest markets, which was unchanged from the previous year.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The study also found a sharp rise in the ratio of pension assets to average gross domestic product (GDP) to 80% at the end of last year from 68.8% at the end of 2019. It is the largest yearly increase since the study began in 1998, matching the rise recorded in 2009 as pension assets rebounded after the global financial crisis.

The report said that although this typically indicates a healthier pension system, the increase underlines the economic impact the pandemic has had on many countries’ GDPs. Among the seven largest pension markets, the rise in the ratio of pension assets to GDP was even more pronounced, surging 20 percentage points to 147% in 2020 from 127% in 2019.

The decadeslong shift to alternative assets among global pension funds continued in 2020, as the asset class accounted for 26% of portfolios in the seven largest markets, up from 23% in 2019, 21% in 2010, 13% in 2005, and just 7% in 2000. The report said equities have mostly been sacrificed in the shift to alts as the average allocation to equities has fallen to 43% in 2020 from 60% 20 years earlier. The average asset allocation among the seven largest markets is now 43% in equities, 29% in bonds, 26% in alternatives, and 2% in cash.

Defined contribution plans have officially surpassed defined benefit (DB) pensions in terms of assets, as they now represent an estimated 53% of total pension assets in the seven largest pension markets, up from 50% in 2019, and 35% in 2000. The report said DC assets have grown at 8.2% per year during the past 10 years, while DB assets have grown at 4.3% per year.

Australia continues to have the highest share of DC plan assets to DB plan assets, with 86% of all pension assets in defined contribution plans, unchanged from 2019, followed by the US with 64%, up from 61% the previous year. Meanwhile Japan, the Netherlands, and the UK had the highest proportion of assets in defined benefit plans at 95%, 94%, and 81%, respectively.

Related Stories:

Worldwide Pension Fund Assets to Rise to $61 Trillion by 2025

Why Wild and Crazy Bitcoin May Become a Pension Portfolio Fixture

Pension Assets Hit Record $38 Trillion Worldwide

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mortgage Securities Deserve a Bigger Place in Pension Portfolios, DoubleLine Says

They have lower volatility and often better returns than corporates, a study by the Gundlach firm concludes.


Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), which are collections of home-loan bonds, have long been a stalwart of insurers. But for other institutional investors, ownership is scant. DoubleLine Capital, the rising fixed-income power, would like to change that.

And it has some interesting research showing that CMOs dedicated to agency-guaranteed bonds, known as mortgage-backed securities (MBS), can book superior performance over time. MBS, of course, are pools of individual mortgages. Those that agencies support—Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae, chiefly—carry the pledge that Uncle Sam will cover any defaults.

Once-popular non-government-backed mortgage securities, which took a hit in the 2008 financial crisis, have diminished in volume. These so-called “private label” home-loan bonds dropped by half from then to now, to $1 trillion.

Meanwhile, agency-supported MBS have expanded in importance. Those packaged into CMOs occupy a small but important part of the mortgage securities arena. For the 12 months ending Sept. 30, agency CMOs had a face value of $1.4 trillion (12.4% of the $10.9 trillion MBS universe), according to a study by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA).

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The yields on CMOs still tend to be higher than those on comparable Treasury securities, typically the benchmark 10-year note. One big reason is that some homeowners refinance their mortgages, which removes them from the CMO pool. So investors need to be compensated for that risk. Right now, the 10-year T-note yields 1.3%, with the CMO at around 2%. The beauty for agency-supported securities is that Washington ensures that investors won’t lose principal.

“Some people think they don’t get performance” from MBS, said Vitaliy Liberman, a portfolio manager at DoubleLine, specializing in the asset. But they do. “They went to corporate bonds to get alpha, when they could get it from mortgage” securities, too. He credited Jeff Gundlach, the firm’s chief, with the seminal insight that led to this conclusion.

One upside for mortgages as a portfolio holding is diversification. Agency CMOs have a low correlation to corporate bonds. Over five years through Sept. 30, the correlation between corporates and agency CMOs was 0.34 (far afield of 1.0, which is a perfect match), the DoubleLine study showed. That speaks to strong risk reduction involving a good dollop of mortgage instruments.

In addition, during that five-year span, agency CMOs had a slightly higher spread to corporates, the report stated, “with little credit risk and generally lower price volatility.”

During stock market slumps, agency CMOs tend to do better than other types of fixed income. And, classically, bonds offset the stock losses to a degree.

Looking at a longer period to capture this, 1997 through last September, the report gauged that these CMOs (as measured by the ICE BofA Agency Index) outpaced long Treasurys (the Bloomberg Barclays US Long Treasury Index) and long corporates (the Bloomberg Barclays Long Corporate Index). When the S&P 500 lost more than 20%, the CMOs rose 15.4% while corporates managed only 1.4% and Treasurys were up 12.9%.

When the S&P 500’s dip was less severe—down 5% to 10%—Treasurys edged past CMOs, gaining 14.9% to 14.4%, with corporates advancing a still-laggard 9.6%.

Adding agency CMOs to the asset mix would help pension plans a lot, the paper argued. The happy result is that mortgage bonds help a pension program’s funded status. After all, many plans were doing very well up to the 2008 financial crisis, and that carnage set a number of them way back. They’ve been scrambling to regain lost ground ever since.

The study focused on the period from the start of 2005, before things went to hell, to last September. A hypothetical portfolio that was totally into corporates resulted in a funded status of 76%, and one with mortgages securities only was a little better, at 78%.

But put them together, 50-50, and the combo has an even better outcome, 86%. Why? The two “are complementary,” Liberman said. The lower MBS volatility works to produce a higher overall return.

Such alchemy, DoubleLine contended, would be a boon to pension plans far and wide.

Related Stories:

SEC Charges Merrill Lynch for Failure to Supervise RMBS Traders

CMBS Risk-Retention Deals Gaining More Attention

CMBS Risk-Retention Deals Gaining More Attention

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

«