Pension Costs Could Force Milwaukee to Lay Off 24% of Workforce

However, a task force says a local tax increase could eliminate the need to reduce the number of city workers.


Milwaukee could have to lay off nearly a quarter of its municipal employees between 2023 and 2025 to pay the city’s annual pension contribution if changes aren’t made to funding requirements, according to a report from a pension task force.

Mayor Tom Barrett launched the task force in June to address the financial challenges arising from the City of Milwaukee Employees’ Retirement System (CMERS)’s funding issues, which have already led to cuts in city workers, including police officers and firefighters. The 13-member panel was comprised of city government representatives, public employee unions, and prominent community members.

“Over the past 10 years, my administration has worked to manage the growing costs of the city’s pension system through benefit adjustments, contribution smoothing, and new revenue options,” Barrett said when he launched the task force. “To date, nothing has sufficiently addressed the problem. The budgetary impact will soon climb to more than $140 million annually, and that demand is simply unsustainable.”

The task force was asked to address several issues, including options to manage and reduce the costs for employee pensions; the most impactful and fair changes to help the city meet the challenges; and how those changes might affect employees, retirees, and the city’s budgets.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

According to the task force’s report, which was released roughly four months later, meeting the current projections for pension funding increases requires an additional $77 million per year from 2023 to 2027.

Property taxes provide the vast majority of funding for the police and fire departments, public library, and other city services, including public health and street maintenance. The report said that with 82% of the city’s tax levy funded budget allocated to personnel, reducing enough expenses to fund increased pension costs would require a 24% reduction in city staff.

“A 24% reduction in city staff would mean the end of many services and serious reductions in others,” the report said. “The task force sees these reductions as an absolute worst case scenario.”

However, the report also noted that enacting layoffs would also reduce the “active” membership of CMERS, changing their future benefits. It said reducing Milwaukee’s workforce would increase the city’s required pension funding cost, as member contributions from active employees make up a significant amount of normal cost funding.

The task force said one way the city could pay for its pension contributions would be to implement a local 0.5% sales tax, which it said would generate an additional $43.7 million in annual revenue. It also said that at 1.5%, or $1.50 per $100 in taxable sales, the tax could raise $131 million per year.

“That amount would be more than enough to provide both relief from current pension funding costs as well as additional funding for property tax reductions, economic development, and even city service expansions,” the report said.

Related Stories:

Milwaukee Could Learn a Thing or Two from Wisconsin’s Healthy Pension

Wisconsin Treasurer Recommends Creating State-Run Retirement Plan

Milwaukee County Retirees Could Lose COLA Increases

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Non-Retirement Investing Among Women Surges

A Fidelity study also finds female investors outperformed men by 40 basis points over the past decade.

The number of women investing non-retirement funds has increased by 50% in just three years, according to Fidelity Investments’ 2021 “Women and Investing Study.”

The study found that 67% of women are now investing outside of retirement accounts, up from 44% in 2018. It also said that since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Millennial women have led the way, with 71% investing outside retirement.

However, Fidelity also found that many women still keep a significant amount of savings in cash or bank accounts, where they earn minimal interest and miss out on much larger potential earnings. Approximately 47% of women report having $20,000 or more in savings, 31% have $50,000 or more, and 18% have $100,000 or more.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

And the research indicates they are missing out on potentially meaningful investment gains: According to an analysis of more than 5 million Fidelity customers over the past decade, on average, women realized positive returns on their investments and also outperformed men by 40 basis points (bps), or 0.4%.

While 50% of the women in the study said they have become more interested in investing since the start of the pandemic, only 41% say they’re comfortable with their investing knowledge. Meanwhile, 47% said they wouldn’t know what to do if given $25,000 to invest.

“We’re seeing a notable shift in women wanting to learn more not just about how to start investing, but how to dig deeper—how to evaluate and select different types of investments to align with specific goals,” said Lorna Kapusta, Fidelity’s head of women investors and customer engagement.

The research comes from a nationwide survey of 1,200 women and 1,200 men who were 21 years of age or older, have a personal income of at least $50,000 a year, and are actively contributing to a workplace retirement savings plan. The survey was conducted by independent research firm CMI Research.

Fidelity said it has seen unprecedented growth in women opening new retail investing accounts over the past year, with a record 43% year-over-year increase since last summer. It also said women are contributing a record-high average 9.2% to workplace savings accounts.

“The last 18 months have been extremely challenging, and, for many women, driven historic levels of stress surrounding their finances, job security, and long-term savings,” Kathleen Murphy, Fidelity’s president of personal investing, said in a statement. “However, in working with millions of women across the country, they have clearly demonstrated their ability to persevere and focus on positive financial steps for the future.”

Related Stories:

Senate Bill Targets Women’s Retirement Savings Inequities

Yale’s Swensen to Asset Managers: Hire More Women and Minorities

Women, Minorities Manage Just 13% of Charitable Assets, Study Finds

Tags: , , , ,

«