Ownership Equals Performance, Asset Management Study Finds

A consulting firm has found establishing an early structure of employee ownership could be crucial in defining success at an asset management firm.

(January 15, 2014) — An asset management firm’s success largely depends on its structure, particularly employee ownership and management, according to Margolis/Kass Advisors.

“While good sales skills and pre-existing relationships are unquestionably beneficial, they only work if top-down company issues are successfully addressed first,” said Janie Kass, the firm’s managing director.

One of the most significant factors in developing a strong structural framework is allocating ownership. The consulting firm found giving ownership to employees would encourage them to “work for the common good. Employee ownership—or a structure containing a strong incentive program to benefit the firm’s growth long-term—encourages behavior to maximize the value of the firm; it aids in retention and influences individual actions.”

However, this decision would affect firms differently, especially by size. Kass said boutique firms often provide investors with transparency, independence, and greater attention to long-term goals, especially with greater employee ownerships.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Bigger firms such as insurance companies, banks, and capital firms, on the other hand, would have access to resources to help “accelerate growth,” Kass said.

When a firm is considering partnership with a larger firm—or a private equity firm—it should ensure investment returns and targets are met, as such goals could be lost as the bigger firm attempt to boost its stake value.

Margolis/Kass Advisors also emphasized that ownership should spread to various employees and not be exclusive to a handful of firm members.

“Extreme and firm-threatening events may be rare, but ownership concentrated in just a few hands can lead to less dramatic, but nonetheless damaging, inattention by team members on the key goal of meeting client expectations,” Kass said.

With such a structure in place, proper creation of senior management group would follow, said the consultant, increasing transparency in management: “This creates a functional balance which is essential for a firm to succeed and includes the key elements of success; firm oversight, investment results, client retention and growth, and the operations essential for a firm to function successfully.”

Related Content: The Role of Manager Talent in Alternatives and What Asset Managers Agree On—And Don’t—in 2014

Ignorance is Bliss? A 2013 DC Investor Survey

401(k) plan members are optimistic about their investments, according to State Street data, but not entirely sure what some of their investments do.

(January 15, 2014) – Saving for retirement is like a Ferris wheel, with ups and downs, according to half of the defined contribution (DC) plan members surveyed by State Street Global Advisors (SSgA).

That’s a positive response, the survey report said, suggesting that the dramatic market movements of the last five years taught investors to expect volatility. Still, expecting volatility did not mean respondents were comfortable with it.  

“There is an argument that since the risk premia on equities are expected to be greater than fixed income, DC portfolios should be 100% stocks while retirement is a long way off,” said Nigel Aston, SSgA’s head of DC in the UK, while discussing the results in New York. “But what we’ve found is that people want stability.”

The survey of 1,021 confirmed DC participants showed optimism, with 78% anticipating markets five years from now would be similar to or stronger than today’s.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

But despite their relatively positive outlooks, DC scheme members were attracted to less risky strategies than in previous years. Roughly half of respondents said they invest at least somewhat more conservatively since the recession, while just 7% reported becoming more aggressive.

“Plan participants are becoming increasingly conservative with a preference for fixed income without a solid understanding of its role in their portfolio,” SSgA’s report noted.

Only half of those surveyed on the features of bonds chose “lower risk than stocks,” and 70% said they reduced volatility. More than a third answered that fixed income “helps minimize the impact of inflation”—nearly the same portion (40%) as stated that bonds better diversify a portfolio. 

Furthermore, the respondents to these biannual surveys tend to skew to higher education and income levels than the general membership base, according to SSgA’s Global Head of DC Fredrik Axsater.

He and his colleague Aston recommended plan sponsors educate members on age-appropriate asset allocation and, more importantly, do their best to ensure members receive it.  

“Globally, across every survey that we do, DC plan participants say over and over again that they welcome automaticity and guidance,” Axsater said. 

Related Content:More 401(k) Options Mean Worse Outcomes; Why People Don't Buy Annuities: They're Confusing 

«