OCIO Hirtle Callaghan Names New CEO

Ex-Bridgewater strategist and former NYC pension advisor will take the helm of the OCIO firm.

Ranji Nagaswami and Jonathan HirtleJonathan Hirtle and Ranji NagaswamiOutsourced-CIO (OCIO) Hirtle Callaghan has appointed former New York City pensions advisor Ranji Nagaswami as CEO.

Nagaswami replaces co-founder Jonathan Hirtle, who will remain at the firm as executive chairman to work full-time focusing on clients and strategy, the firm announced Tuesday.

“Ranji Nagaswami is an exceptional leader and an extraordinarily talented industry executive,” Hirtle said in a statement. “She brings tremendous additional strength to our executive team as we enter the next phase of our firm’s development and growth.”

The new CEO joins from Corsair Capital, where she was a senior advisor for two years. Prior to that, Nagaswami held roles at Bridgewater Associates, AllianceBernstein, and UBS Asset Management.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

From 2010 to 2012, she was chief investment advisor to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, counseling on the city’s $150 billion retirement system.

“Hirtle Callaghan is a firm of investment industry idealists with a history of innovation in managing complete, custom-designed investment solutions for its clients,” Nagaswami said in a statement. “I am thrilled to be at its helm and find ways to strengthen our conflict-free, value creation model for the benefit of investors seeking complete fiduciary alignment in their outsourced investment department.”

According to CIO’s OCIO survey, Hirtle Callaghan managed $24.1 billion of outsourced family office, endowment, foundation, health care, and pension assets as of January 2016.

Related: Explosive Growth, Quiet Fears &2016 Outsourced-Chief Investment Officer Buyer’s Guide: Hirtle Callaghan & Co.

Debunking Private Equity Performance

Researchers from the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board suggest a better benchmark for evaluating buyout funds.

Private equity outperformance may just be a figment of bad benchmarks, a CFA Institute report has suggested.

While buyout funds have outperformed the S&P 500 by more than 3% annually, that outperformance disappeared when funds were compared to an index that more closely resembles private equity holdings, according to Abu Dhabi Investment Authority’s Jean-François L’Her and Rossitsa Stoyanova, and Kathryn Shaw, William Scott, and Charissa Lai of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.

To more accurately evaluate the performance of private equity, the researchers used a risk-adjusted benchmark “fairly representing the size, sector composition, and leverage of portfolio companies in buyout funds.”

Specifically, they determined that private equity portfolio companies have, on average, smaller market capitalizations than their public counterparts. Sector compositions of buyout funds were also “materially different” than the market as a whole, with financial, health care, and information technology companies underweighted. Leverage was “significantly” higher, the authors found.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“After making these risk adjustments, we find no significant outperformance of buyout fund investments versus the public market equivalent on a dollar-weighted basis,” they wrote.

But even without the outperformance, the researchers argued that buyout funds still serve a “valuable role in an institutional investor’s portfolio.”

“They provide small-cap equity exposure and broaden the opportunity set available to public equity investors—an important portfolio addition, especially where small-cap equity markets are thinner,” they wrote.

Additionally, private equity presented a “more attractive opportunity for exercising manager selection compared with public equities,” the researchers wrote, as well as the ability to diversify over vintage years.

Finally, the authors highlighted direct investments as a prospect for true outperformance.

“Large institutional investors make direct investments, which—with appropriate security selection, portfolio construction, and fee/carry structuring—lead to higher overall private equity returns,” they concluded.

Read the full paper, “A Bottom-Up Approach to the Risk-Adjusted Performance of the Buyout Fund Market.”

Related: Doing Private Equity in Public Markets

«