NYC’s 5 Pension Funds Return Combined 8% in Fiscal 2023

The returns are expected to reduce the city’s required contributions to the pension systems by approximately $550 million over the next five years.



The five pension funds that comprise the New York City Retirement Systems reported a combined net return of 8.0% for the fiscal year that ended June 30, led by a rise in total asset value of equity investments to $253.19 billion from $240 billion at the end of fiscal 2022. 

The performance, which surpassed the retirement systems’ 7.0% target return, was a sharp turnaround from fiscal 2022, when the pension funds lost a combined 8.65% as stocks tanked and private markets were the top performers. This year, most alternatives delivered a relatively flat performance, while stocks have rallied.

“Despite global economic challenges and market volatility, New York City’s pension funds surpassed our benchmarks and our target rate of return over the past year,” New York City Comptroller Brad Lander said in a release. “I am grateful to the staff of our Bureau of Asset Management for their hard work and rigorous approach to securing added value.” 

When the pension funds’ annual return exceeds the target return, the city budget is adjusted to require lower deposits. Likewise, when returns are below the 7% assumed rate, as they were in fiscal 2022, the city must contribute additional funds. The annual adjustments are spread over five years to smooth the impact. The NYC comptroller’s office said the 8.0% returns for the 2023 fiscal year will reduce the city’s required contributions to the pension systems by approximately $550 million over the next five years.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The pension funds reported three-, five- and seven-year annualized returns net of management fees of 7.5%, 6.8% and 7.9%, respectively, and had a combined funded ratio of 82% as of the end of June.

“I’m proud of the positive returns achieved in a challenging year, but we must continue to focus on long-term outcomes,” NYC Retirement Systems CIO Steven Meier said in a release. “We will continue to work diligently to build on our capabilities to meet these obligations over a long investment horizon.”

The top-performing asset class for the pension funds was U.S. equity, which contributed 5 percentage points of the 8% performance, followed by developed equity outside the U.S., which contributed 1.8 percentage points. Emerging markets and high yield each contributed 0.5 percentage points, while infrastructure and opportunistic fixed income each contributed 0.1 points of the total 8% return. The only asset classes that contributed negatively to the portfolios were core fixed income and private real estate, which contributed -0.2 percentage points and -0.1 percentage points, respectively.

Treasury inflation-protected securities, private equity, hedge funds and cash did not contribute to the fiscal year 2023 return.

As of the end of June, the retirement systems’ asset allocation was 28.6% in U.S. equity, 20.7% in core fixed income, 9.9% in developed ex-U.S. equity, 9.7% in private equity, 6.6% in private real estate, 6.5% in emerging markets, 5.3% in high yield, 4.1% in opportunistic fixed income, 3.3% in TIPS and 1% in convertible bonds.

The NYCRS systems also announced they will undertake “strategic asset allocation reviews” in the coming months, as they do every three to five years. As part of the process, the trustees, along with the Bureau of Asset Management and each fund’s general consultant, will scrutinize market trends and adjust the target allocations for each asset class for the coming years.

Related Stories:

New York City Retirement Systems Emphasized Sustainable Stakeholder Value in 2022

Steven Meier Named CIO of New York City Pension System

New York City Mulls Lowering Investment Return Targets to 6.8%

Tags: , , , , ,

ICPM Gives Top Research Award to Paper Exploring Active vs. Passive Investing

Research awards were also granted to papers covering climate risk and sustainable investing.



The International Centre for Pension Management gave the top prize in its annual research awards to a paper that uses a proprietary database to explore the relationship between the structure and size of defined benefit pension plans and their choice of management style and asset allocation.

The Canadian nonprofit oversees an academic research program that awards C$50,000 ($37,600) to the top three academic papers chosen following a peer review by its research committee.

The ICPM looks for papers with implications for fund management, engagement of plan participants, pension design, governance, long-term investing, risk management, environmental, social, and governance issues and other investment-related topics. To be considered, the papers must be completed or close to completion but cannot have already been published. Award winners are invited to present their research at a webinar or a discussion forum.

The top prize of C$20,000 went to “Scale Economies, Bargaining Power, and Investment Performance: Evidence from Pension Plans,” authored by Tjeerd de Vries, S. Yanki Kalfa and Allan Timmermann from the University of California, San Diego, along with Russ Wermers of the University of Maryland.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The paper is based on a unique proprietary database used to explore the relationship between the structure and size of defined benefit pension plans and their choice of active vs. passive management, internal vs. external management and allocation to public vs. private markets.

“Our results indicate a strong role for economic scale in pension plan investments: large plans have stronger bargaining power over their external managers in negotiating fees as well as access to better-performing funds, relative to small plans,” the authors wrote. “Large plans, hence, pay significantly lower fees per dollar invested than their smaller peers.”

The ICPM awarded C$15,000 to “A Quantity-Based Approach to Constructing Climate Risk Hedge Portfolios,” written by Georgij Alekseev of Palantir Technologies, Stefano Giglio of Yale University and Quinn Maingi, Julia Selgrad and Johannes Stroebel of New York University. Their paper proposes a new methodology to build portfolios that hedge the economic and financial risks from climate change.

“We introduce a quantity-based approach to hedging aggregate news about climate change and other macro risks,” the authors wrote. “Our quantity-based hedge portfolios outperform traditional approaches to hedging climate risks.”

The ICPM awarded another C$15,000 to “Counterproductive Sustainable Investing: The Impact Elasticity of Brown and Green Firms,” written by Samuel Hartzmark of Boston College and Kelly Shue of Yale University.

Hartzmark and Shue developed a new measure of impact elasticity, which they define as a firm’s change in environmental impact due to a change in its cost of capital.

“We show empirically that a reduction in financing costs for firms that are already green leads to small improvements in impact at best,” the authors wrote. “In contrast, increasing financing costs for brown firms leads to large negative changes in firm impact. Thus, sustainable investing that directs capital away from brown firms and toward green firms may be counterproductive, in that it makes brown firms more brown without making green firms more green.”

The organization also awarded honorable mentions to “Quantifying the Impact of Impact Investing” by MIT’s Andrew Lo and Peking University’s Ruixun Zhang, and to “How the Provision of Inflation Information Affects Pension Contributions: A Field Experiment,” by Pascal Büsing, Henning Cordes and Thomas Langer from the University of Münster.

Related Stories:

International Centre for Pension Management Names 2 New Board Members

Pension Investments Boost Corporate Productivity, Study Says

Sebastien Betermier Named Executive Director of ICPM

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

«