NY State Pension Misses Target with 2019 Return of 5.3%

The New York State Common Retirement Fund earned an estimated 5.23% return on investments for the fiscal year that ended March 31 to reach an estimated value of $210.2 billion, up from $207.4 billion at the end of fiscal year 2018. This was below the fund’s long-term expected rate of return of 7%, and well behind the 11.35% the portfolio returned last year.

Despite the underperforming return for 2019, the fund’s asset value has risen 93% in the past 10 years, and has more than tripled since 1995.

“The Fund’s value continued to grow during its 2019 fiscal year and remains well positioned to meet its long-term return expectations and provide retirement security for our members, retirees and their beneficiaries,” New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said in a release. “It was a tumultuous year in the markets that fortunately came with more ups than downs, including a swift recovery from December’s significant correction.”

Private equity was the fund’s top-performing asset class, returning 9.90% for the year, followed by domestic equities, real assets, and real estate, which rose 8.84%, 8.15%, and 7.09%, respectively. The worst-performing asset class was non-US equities, which lost 4.46% for the year, after returning 17.02% in 2018, followed by absolute return strategies, cash, and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, which returned 2.07%, 2.59%, and 2.76%, respectively.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Domestic equities was the fund’s largest asset allocation at 35.8%, followed by core fixed income, non-US equities, and private equity at 17.3%, 12.9%, and 9.1% of the portfolio, respectively. That compares to last year’s allocations of 36.6%, 16.8%, 15.2%, and 8.3%, respectively.

Source: New York State Comptroller’s Office

New York Common Must Have 100% Sustainable Investments by 2030, Study Urges

Tags: New York State Common Retirement Fund (NYCRF), Pension, Returns

Despite increasing demands by investors for more diversity among asset managers, progress in these firms has been slow, according to a report from investment management and consulting firm Wilshire Associates.

A survey by Wilshire asked more than 500 asset managers whether they believe having diverse and inclusive teams is important and, if so, how they approach diversity in their hiring and talent retention programs. The report’s key finding was that diversity is not a priority for many asset managers.

The report cited statistics showing that fewer than 200 of 7,000 mutual funds are run by women, and that women accounted for just over 10% of investment partner or equivalent roles. Additionally, it said people of color make up 22% of the venture capital workforce, with African American employees and Hispanic or Latino employees at just 3% and 4%, respectively.

According to the survey, many managers are “beginning to wake up to the lack of diversity in their firms” as almost 60% of those polled who are running public markets strategies said their firm places a high importance on diversity. However, the results also indicate that interest and concern have not translated into action.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

The data also revealed that approximately 25% of firms running private market strategies are not prioritizing diversity, and rated its importance a 3 out of 5 or less.

“Some firms responding to our survey said they have been successful in building diverse teams organically, without prioritizing diversity,” said the report. “In other words, diversity is not an intentional outcome of their hiring practices or talent retention programs.”

And other managers said that while they felt diversity was important, it was not a priority because the firm was formed as a small team that was not expected to grow, or the team has low turnover or long-tenured employees.

“The results beg important questions: How should we view these responses? Are they just well-articulated excuses or are they genuine barriers to diversity which require careful reflection when we are engaging with managers on this topic?” said the report. “On the one hand, we view long-tenured portfolio managers as a strength … on the other hand, low investment staff turnover also limits the opportunity to improve diversity if it is missing.”

When asked to rank the benefits they hope to gain from building diverse investment teams, respondents said firms that are prioritizing diversity are doing so based on improving the quality of investment decisions.

“Achieving strong returns requires having a broad spectrum of unique company and industry insights,” said one firm in response to the survey. “Such insights can only be generated by a diverse team of analysts who not only possess strong research skills and the ability to think independently and creatively, but also bring unique perspectives to their analysis of businesses.”

Tags: Asset Managers, Diversity, Wilshire Associates