NY Bill Would Divest Teachers’ Pension from Fossil Fuels

A report says the state teachers’ fund has more than $300 million in coal investments.


New York state legislators have introduced a bill that would require the state teachers’ retirement system to divest from fossil fuels.

The Teachers’ Fossil Fuel Divestment Act would force the $120.5 billion New York State Teachers’ Retirement System (NYSTRS) to divest any stocks, securities, equities, assets, or other obligations of companies on an exclusion list of coal and oil and gas producers.

According to a recent report from activist group Divest NY, NYSTRS has more than $300 million invested in companies with substantial coal reserves. The report said the pension fund owns stocks in 36 companies on the Carbon Underground Coal 100 List, which identifies the top coal and oil and gas publicly-traded reserve holders globally, and ranks them by the potential carbon emissions content of their reported reserves.

The fund even increased its investments in 24 of those companies by a total of 6.2 million shares as recently as the last quarter of 2020, the report said. This includes adding of 1.1 million shares of Chinese coal company Shaanxi Coal Industry Co., which has one of the largest coal reserves in the world that is estimated to have more annual carbon dioxide emissions than the US.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“We are all being called on to play a role in reducing our collective greenhouse gas production,” said Assemblywoman Anna Kelles, one of the sponsors the bill, according to Spectrum1 News. “Continuing to invest in oil and gas companies and companies that are based on significant coal production and consumption no longer makes fiscal sense.”

Under the bill, any company on the exclusion list may request that the retirement system board remove them from the list based on “clear and convincing evidence” that they are not currently a coal producer or an oil and gas producer.

The bill defines a coal producer as any company that derives at least 10% of its annual revenue from thermal coal production, or accounts for more than 1% of global production of thermal coal, or whose reported coal reserves contain more than 0.3 gigatons of potential carbon dioxide emission. And it defines an oil and gas producer as any company that derives at least 20% of its annual revenue from oil or gas production, or accounts for more than 1% of global oil or gas production, or whose combined oil and gas reserves contain more than 0.1 gigatons of potential carbon dioxide emissions.

In a sponsor memo accompanying the bill, the backers of the legislation said that that the majority of fossil fuel producers are not adapting their business models to take into account the changing energy market, and are instead investing billions of dollars in exploring and extracting new reserves and creating “stranded asset risk,” which they said could lead to a rapid and significant loss of value.

“Attempting to beat the market by holding these investments until the last possible moment is a high-risk strategy that could result in the loss of investment principal,” the memo said. “Being too early in the avoidance of the risk of permanent loss is much less of a danger than being too late.”

Related Stories:

New York State Pension Fund Aims to Be Carbon Net Zero by 2040

Two NYC Pension Funds Divesting $4 Billion from Oil Companies

New York City Takes ‘Major Next Step’ on Fossil Fuel Divestments

Tags: , , , , , ,

Shiller: Today’s Housing Boom Will End, But Slowly

The market won’t collapse all at once, yet the dip still will be painful, economist says.


Academic Robert Shiller once called the stock market’s performance “irrational exuberance” in a 2000 book title—it presciently foresaw the bursting of the dot-com bubble. He says another such bubble is about to deflate, albeit slowly: housing. 

Burgeoning home prices cannot keep going up, and eventually will drop, he told a Yahoo Finance video program. “They’ll come back down, not overnight, but enough to cause some pain,” Shiller said.

Sure, Yale professor Shiller is a prominent perma-bear, yet his reasoning is worth listening to. He has long specialized in residential real estate, and even developed a price index for the field, along with the late Karl Case, a fellow economist.

There’s no denying that the housing scene has gotten frothy. The latest S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller national home price index, for March, showed a 13.2% annual increase. That marks the fastest rise since 2006.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Other real estate barometers back this up. On Tuesday, the Commerce Department reported that the median price of a new home in April was $372,400, a gain of 20.1% over the previous 12 months. That’s the strongest annual hike since 1988. Meanwhile, the median sales price for existing homes climbed 19.1% annually through last month to $341,600, the National Association of Realtors indicated last week.

Why is this happening? To Shiller, a Nobel laureate, prominent factors are low interest rates and pent-up demand inspired by the pandemic-forced lockdowns. Plus, there’s a psychological element, he added.

“People are having fun, and they will as long as prices keep going up,” Shiller said. He compared the situation to the years right after World War II, another time of willy-nilly spending, which has echoes of the euphoria that many are showing amid what they hope is the pandemic’s end. After peace arrived, he said, “There was a spending spree by people. They were jubilant the war was over.”

Alas, today’s levity won’t last forever—although he doesn’t look for a sudden swoon. “This is not a market that collapses overnight,” Shiller maintained. “It’s less short-run volatile than the stock market.”

Shiller thinks the current housing market looks similar to that of 2003, at the outset of the last housing bubble. “There is excitement and people are talking and some people are bidding way more than the asking price,” he said, “and that becomes a narrative or a story.”

While terming the present home-price run-up “disquieting,” he pointed out that the easy-mortgage environment that fueled the housing crash of 2008 is not the case nowadays.

“We have better protections, we have better supervision of lenders” now, he said. And he noted that, aside from the demand frenzy, current spiraling home prices stemmed in part from forces such as a lumber shortage. This is the result of a closing of sawmills in the wake of the last housing bust.

Related Stories:

Economic Pain May Last for Years, Shiller Warns

Shiller: A Recession Is ‘Highly Likely’ Due to Virus Panic

Shiller Doubts Booming Earnings, Now Propelling the Market, Will Last

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«