Number of FTSE Firms Providing Final Salary Benefits Drops

Researchers have found that the number of defined benefit pension schemes in the UK has continued to plummet over the past year.

(August 23, 2010) — Despite an uptick in equity markets, a study by Pension Capital Strategies (PCS) has found that the number of FTSE 250 companies providing final salary benefits to a majority of employees has dropped to just 15, down from 20 a year ago.

The decline in DB coverage reflects mounting difficulties for companies seeking to prevent growing pension liabilities in the face of economic hardship and longer life expectancies. An additional study earlier this month by Mercer showed that as a result of changes in accounting assumptions, median liabilities at FTSE 100 companies jumped about 20% last year, as pension scheme longevity assumptions increased for a fourth consecutive year. “Rising life expectancy continues to have serious financial implications for pension schemes,”Mercer’s Warren Singer stated in the research report.

According to PCS, an advisory group that is owned by the insurer JLT Group, out of the FTSE 250, only 144 companies have any type of pension scheme, with 86 companies still providing “more than a handful” of current employees with DB benefits. PCS found that the pension liabilities of FTSE 250 companies have grown from £55 billion to £68 billion over the past year.

Meanwhile, the report by PCS revealed that 21 FTSE 250 companies, including FirstGroup, Premier Foods, and Go-Ahead, have total disclosed pension liabilities greater than their equity market value. Yet, following new financial measures from companies to support their schemes, the total pension deficit of FTSE 250 schemes as of June 30 fell by £1 billion over the year to £11 billion, PCS stated.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“More than ever before, pension liabilities are impacting decisions in the boardroom. Faced with a challenging business cycle, it is not surprising that companies are reacting by closing down their final salary pension schemes,” said Charles Cowling, managing director at PCS, according to The Telegraph.

Separately, research by MetLife Europe has shown that market volatility has slashed annualized returns from direct investment in the FTSE 100 to 0.5% over the past ten years. The firm showed total returns on £200,000 invested in December 2009 had only grown to £212,000, as the FTSE 100 experienced high volatility through this period. “Governments cannot control the stock markets but they can provide the legislative framework for providers to offer flexible and transparent products aimed at maximising pension saving,” MetLife UK managing director Dominic Grinstead said, according to Global Pensions.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Schwarzenegger to Borrow $2 Billion From CalPERS

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has privately proposed borrowing from CalPERS to help ameliorate California's $19 billion budget deficit.

(August 23, 2010) — Republican California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is seeking $2 billion from the $211.4 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to credit the state.

To erase a $19 billion state budget deficit, the governor has proposed a reduction in public worker pensions to 1999 levels, refusing to sign any budget that doesn’t contain the cuts. Schwarzenegger would count the $2 billion as an advance on the roughly $74 billion he estimates in savings during the next three decades from his proposals to roll back pension benefits for government workers, Bloomberg reported. The advance would come from pension cuts projected to save $93 billion over 30 years.

Still, Republicans and Democrats lack a solution over whether to use higher taxes or spending reductions to lower the state’s deficit. With California still lacking an accepted budget, negotiators are considering alternatives to generate savings, such as borrowing or deferring payments, The Sacramento Bee reported.

The state is required to pay $3.9 billion this fiscal year to CalPERS in order to finance retiree costs, up from $145 million a decade earlier.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«