Norway Pension Fund Drops Nine Companies | Chief Investment Officer

Norway’s $1.071 trillion Government Pension Fund Global said it has decided to exclude nine companies from the fund, and has placed one company “under observation.”

The fund said it has excluded transport company Evergreen Marine Corp (Taiwan) Ltd., energy resource shipping company Korea Line Corp., Thailand-based dry cargo ship-owner Precious Shipping PCL, and strategic investment holding company Thoresen Thai Agencies PCL. It said its decisions for these companies was based on an assessment of the risk of severe environmental damage, and “serious or systematic violations of human rights.”

The fund also placed Korean marine transportation company Pan Ocean Co. Ltd under observation based on the same criteria, while Polish residential developer Atal SA has also been excluded due to unacceptable risk of serious or systematic violations of human rights.

The pension fund said its executive board has also decided to exclude Los Angeles-based engineering company AECOM, UK-based aerospace and defense company BAE Systems, Texas-based engineering company Fluor Corp., and Newport News, Virginia.-based shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. “because of their involvement in the production of nuclear weapons.” The board also has decided to maintain the exclusion of Honeywell International Inc. based on the same criteria.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

The executive board’s decisions on exclusion were made on the basis of recommendations from the fund’s council on ethics. While it has not conducted an independent assessment of all aspects of the recommendations, it said it is satisfied that the exclusion criteria have been fulfilled.

Norges Bank Investment Management, which established and manages the pension fund, said that before it decides to exclude a company, it considers whether the use of other measures, including the exercise of ownership rights, may be better suited. However, in these cases, the board said it concluded that it is not appropriate to use other measures.

Among the reasons the fund either excludes or puts companies on its observation list include the production of nuclear weapons and cluster munitions, coal or coal-based energy, and tobacco. It also excludes companies that have serious violations of human rights and cause severe environmental damage.

Tags: AECOM, Atal SA, BAE Systems, Evergreen Marine Corp, Government Pension Fund Global, human rights violations, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Norges Bank, Norway, nuclear divestment, Pan Ocean, Thoresen Thai Agencies

Policeman on duty at Inner Harbor, Baltimore

A circuit judge has ruled that former Baltimore mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, and the Baltimore city council, unlawfully broke their contract with police officers, firefighters and retirees with the passage of a 2010 pension overhaul plan that reduced retirees’ pension benefits.

“The court finds that, by enacting ordinance 10-306, the city retrospectively, and therefore unlawfully, withdrew from plaintiffs Houser, Williams and Sledgeski their rights to the variable benefit feature of the plan as it stood prior to the ordinance,” wrote

Judge Julie Rubin in her judgment. “By enacting ordinance 10-306, the City breached its contract.”

The pension overhaul in 2010 was introduced by Rawlings-Blake, who said the plan would reduce the city’s costs by a minimum of $64 million annually, and prevent an impending fiscal crisis. However, the police and fire fighter unions balked at the proposal.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

Under the overhaul plan, firefighters and police have had to increase their contributions to the pension fund, which is now 10% of their salaries. Many officers were informed that they would have to stay on the job for 25 years to receive their pensions, instead of 20 years. Retirees also lost a so-called “variable benefit,” which was an annual increase tied to the stock market. Under the mayor’s plan, the youngest retirees received no annual increase through the variable benefit, and older retirees earned only a 1% or 2% annual increase.

In June of 2010, Baltimore was sued in the US District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division, with the plaintiffs challenging the federal constitutionality of ordinance 10-306, which amended the codification of the Fire and Police Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Baltimore.

Judge Rubin did not specify any damages the city would have to pay, but city council members reportedly said the city could be forced to pay out tens of millions of dollars in pension benefits dating back to 2010. According to a report from the Baltimore Sun, an actuary has estimated the city could be held accountable for as much as $57 million in payments if the city ends up losing the case.

According to the Sun, City Councilman Eric Costello, who chairs the budget committee, said $24.3 million has been set aside to pay out in case they lose the lawsuit.

“This has been ongoing for seven years,” Costello told the Sun. “I’d like to see it resolved as quickly as a humanly possible.”

The next court date in the ongoing litigation has not yet been announced.

Tags: Baltimore, Lawsuits, Maryland, Pension