No Vaccine? Then Look for 18 Months of Shutdowns

Fed’s Kashkari warns of new flare-ups that could push economy back into an induced coma.

If there’s no effective vaccine or therapy for the coronavirus now ravaging the nation, the US should expect 18 months of rolling shutdowns amid periodic surges in new contagions, according to Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari.

The path out of the US economy’s current government-ordered business closings, he told the NBC “Today” show on Tuesday, will be halting. “I don’t think we’re going to go back to how life was in January or February for the next 18 months.”

Rather, he said, “we’re going to have to slowly reopen things … and then very carefully see if we have flare-ups for the foreseeable future until we get an effective treatment or a vaccine.”

As the Fed studies other spots around the world where lockdowns have been eased, “the virus flares back up again,” said Kashkari, a rising star at the Fed and a 2020 member of its policymaking body, Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“We could have these waves of flare-ups, controls, flare-ups, and controls until we actually get a therapy or a vaccine. I think we should all be focusing on an 18-month strategy for our health care system and our economy.”

Right now, unemployment has surged across the US with 17 million people filing for jobless benefits over the past three weeks. That has prompted President Donald Trump and other politicians to eye when business activity could be restored.

A partial re-opening could happen in May, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Nevertheless, that risks having the coronavirus outbreak re-emerge again in autumn, he noted.

Some, such as the president, envision an abrupt snapback of economic growth once business restrictions are lifted. Others, such as Kashkari, are less optimistic about an immediate restoration of the booming economy that the virus shutdowns cut short. “It’s hard for me to see a V-shaped recovery under that scenario,” the Fed official said.

Kashkari knows firsthand about dealing with economic disasters. As an assistant Treasury secretary, he oversaw Troubled Asset Relief Program, a federal facility set up to bail out banks during the 2008-09 financial crisis. And he is no stranger to politics. A Republican, he ran and lost in a race to dislodge California’s then-Gov. Jerry Brown in 2014.

A longtime advocate of keeping interest rates low, Kashkari was a backer of the Fed’s slicing rates to near-zero in response to the economic dead stop. Unlike some who worry that this and the recently enacted $2.3 trillion in government stimulus spending risk future inflation, Kashkari has argued that inflationary pressures are and will remain small.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell recently cautioned that the economic downturn was occurring at an “alarming speed” and that joblessness would temporarily reach extremely high levels.

 Related Stories:

BlackRock CEO Believes Economy Will ‘Recover Steadily’

Coronavirus Will Cause ‘Unprecedented Shock’ to Global Economy

Coronavirus Crisis Is ‘Crushing’ Global GDP Growth

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Most Institutional Investors Are Sticking to Their Private Market Allocations During the Pandemic

A survey by Eaton Partners concludes many institutional investors are keeping their allocations to private assets the same or increasing them.

Institutional investors are, for the most part, doing little in the way of dynamic asset allocation with their private market holdings in today’s environment, according to a new survey by Eaton Partners, a placement agent and fund advisory firm.

The majority, or 64%, of the 107 “top institutional investors” canvassed by Eaton said the market disruption will have no effect on their private market asset allocations, so they’ll largely stick to the script. Fifteen percent of respondents said they will increase their allocation to private markets and 21% are mitigating their allocations.

“While we do see LPs [limited partners] committing to GPs already in the process of underwriting, we also expect there will likely be a decrease in overall fundraising activity over the coming months,” noted Jeff Eaton, partner at Eaton Partners. “Private capital fundraising activity typically has lagged the public markets by two-quarters as denominator effect impacts and updated fund valuations take hold.”

There could be some increased appetite for private equity fund managers with a 2018-2019 vintage who are looking to deploy capital. Once the markets settle down from the current volatility, vintage funds will be ideally placed to acquire portfolio companies at the bottom of the pricing curve.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

On the short end of the stick are funds with a vintage year between 2012 and 2017, which are looking to divest their assets. About 60% of Eaton’s survey respondents expressed concern over how many private equity-backed companies will be able to receive financial support from the federal government’s stimulus packages.

These concerns may or may have not contributed to an apparent decline in interest in the sector. Eaton Partners found that the percentage of respondents who found private equity to be the most appealing alternative asset class fell 13 percentage points, from 52% in mid-March to 39% today.

Infrastructure took the lead with the most promise for diversification potential, grabbing the highest allocation of respondents (33%) who said they believe the asset class offers the strongest uncorrelated returns to public equity markets.

Related stories:

CIO Roundtable: How Top Asset Allocators are Dealing with Today’s Volatile Market

6 Battle-wise CIOs Weigh in on Choosing Managers

Coronavirus a Boon for 2018/2019 Private Equity Vintage Funds

Tags: , , , , , ,

«