New Zealand Super Fund Shifts Passive Equities to Low Carbon

Fund moves $10.2 billion into eco-friendlier firms, eyes active investments next.

The NZ$35 billion ($25.6 billion) New Zealand Superannuation Fund’s (NZ Super Fund) has moved its NZ$14 billion global passive equity portfolio, which accounts for 40% of the overall fund, into low-carbon investments. 

The fund said the  changes have significantly reduced its overall carbon footprint, and are a key part of the trustees’ strategy to address climate change investment risk. As of June 30, the fund’s total carbon emissions intensity is 19.6% lower, and its exposure to carbon reserves is 21.5% lower, than if the changes hadn’t been made.

The transition involved reallocating NZ$950 million away from companies with high exposure to carbon emissions and reserves into lower-risk companies. The fund said the move makes it more resilient to climate change investment risks.

“There is a global consensus that climate change presents material risks for long-term investors,” said Adrian Orr, chief executive of the NZ Super Fund. “Leading investors around the world are adjusting their portfolios to address climate change risk and capture opportunities stemming from the transition to a low-carbon economy.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The low-carbon portfolio is based on a carbon measurement methodology for listed equities developed by the fund’s trustees in concert with MSCI ESG Research. MSCI ESG Research also provided independent carbon data and company ratings.

Despite the shift, the fund said it will still hold some companies in its passive portfolio that have a high exposure to carbon emissions and reserves. It said it would limit its investment in these companies to ones  that have been rated better than their peers by MSCI ESG Research, and where there is “evidence of strong management engagement with the challenge of climate change.”

Matt Whineray, NZ Super Fund’s CIO, said financial markets were under-pricing climate change risk over the fund’s long investment timeframe. “The global energy system is transitioning away from fossil fuels,” he said. “For investors with very long horizons, such as the fund, reducing exposure to carbon emissions and reserves is a low-cost insurance policy.”

Whineray added that the fund’s trustees also found that carbon exposures were highly concentrated in a relatively small group of companies. “By targeting this group we have been able to significantly reduce the fund’s carbon footprint while retaining the diversification benefits of passive investment,” he said.

“This will help us capture the upside from companies which are better placed to succeed within the rapidly-transforming energy sector,” said Whineray. “The bulk of the fund’s equity exposure is through its passive mandates, although the fund also still holds high-carbon stocks periodically due to the discretionary decisions of active managers.”

While the NZ Super Fund’s initial focus on reducing its carbon footprint has been with the passive portfolio, Whineray said the  next priority is to reduce carbon exposure in the fund’s  active investment strategies.

“We are also pushing ahead with other aspects of our climate change strategy,” said Whineray, “including incorporating climate change risk into our investment analysis, engaging with portfolio companies to promote better risk management, and identifying new investment opportunities from the global transition to a low-carbon economy.”

Tags: , , ,

Kentucky Universities Mull Split from State Retirement System

Plan has already gone to Council on Postsecondary Education.

Kentucky’s state schools are considering breaking off from the state retirement system and creating a pension plan of their own, according to Michael Benson, president of Eastern Kentucky University.

Benson, who is responsible for convening Kentucky public university presidents, said the plan has already gone to the Council on Postsecondary Education (CPE), and that the next step would be to take the proposal to the state budget director.

“We’re looking at a way that maybe we could opt out of the system and be able to finance it ourselves as one of the options,” said Benson in an interview with National Public Radio affiliate WEKU after the annual convocation before faculty and staff earlier this week. “So we’re in discussions now with CPE and the presidents.”

The Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS) consists of three separate retirement systems: the Kentucky Employees Retirement System (KERS) for state employees, the County Employees Retirement System (CERS,  for local government and classified school board employees,  and the State Police Retirement System (SPRS), which is for uniformed Kentucky State Police officers.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

According to an audit report from the PFM Group, Kentucky’s retirement system faces a funding shortfall across its pension systems of $33 billion, and could face insolvency in just five years.  The universities are looking to emulate CERS, which is in the process of trying to separate itself from the state retirement system. Kentucky Senate Bill 226 aims to divorce CERS from the KRS, and create a separate board of governance.

Benson also said that the universities are eyeing a defined benefit format for a separate pension, which would be a change for new employees who are currently placed a hybrid plan. The hybrid plan has characteristics of both a defined benefit plan and a defined contribution plan. This plan is for members who began participating in the system after Jan. 1, 2004.

 

Tags: , ,

«