New York State Pension Increases Employer Contribution Rates

Actuary recommended changes because of increasing life spans and lower-than-expected returns.


The New York State and Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has increased employer contribution rates for the Employees’ Retirement System (ERS) for fiscal year 2021-22 to 16.2% from 14.6% of payroll, and for the Police and Fire Retirement System (PFRS) to 28.3% of payroll from 24.4%.

The new rates represent increases of 11% and 16%, respectively, for the ERS and PFRS. There are more than 3,000 participating employers in ERS and PFRS, and more than 300 different retirement plan combinations.

“Employer contribution rates have gone down or remained relatively flat for several years, but demographic changes, such as longer life spans, and market volatility are nudging up rates,” New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement. “Keeping the plan well-funded has helped improve New York’s credit rating and avoided the budget problems faced by states with poorly funded pensions.”

The funded ratio of the state pension fund is currently 86.2%, DiNapoli said.  

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

NYSLRS’ actuary made the recommendation for the increase, which was based on investment performance and actuarial assumptions. The recommendations were reviewed by the independent Actuarial Advisory Committee and approved by DiNapoli.

According to the NYSLRS, the actuary found that retirees and beneficiaries are living longer and members are retiring at a higher rate than previously projected. The main factors contributing to the increase were the demographic factors combined with slightly lower-than-expected investment results over the past five years. The actuary warned that assumptions and rates could be impacted in the future because of economic turmoil and “extraordinary uncertainty” in 2020.

Although the assumed rate of return stayed unchanged at 6.8% after being lowered from 7% last year, it may be lowered again next year as the system’s actuary recommended that it be reviewed in 2021. In 2010, DiNapoli decreased the assumed rate of return to 7.5% from 8%, and then lowered it again in 2015 to 7%. According to the National Association of State Retirement Administrators, the median assumed rate of return for state public pension funds as of July is 7.25%. NYSLRS is one of only 24 of 130 major public funds that currently have an investment return assumption below 7%.

Meanwhile, the New York State Common Retirement Fund (CRF) made nearly $375 million in private equity investments in July, according to the fund’s most recent monthly transaction report.  

The fund made a €300 million ($354.6 million) commitment to the EQT Partners’ EQT IX, which will target buyout investments in Europe within the health care, business services, industrial technology, and technology, media, and telecom sectors. It also made a A$14 million ($10.2 million) commitment through the NYAI Co Investment Fund III to the Adamantem Capital Fund II, L.P. Adamantem was established in 2016 to make control investments in companies with an enterprise value of between A$100 million and A$300 million.

The fund also made a $10 million commitment to the Pitango Venture Capital Fund VIII, L.P. through the Hamilton Lane/NYSCRF Israel Fund, L.P. Pitango will make early stage venture investments in the technology industry.

Related Stories:

New York Common Fund Returns 10% in First Quarter

New York Pension Fund to Supplement Federal Small Business Loans

New York Common Fund Loses 2.7% in Fiscal Year

Tags: , , , , ,

Will Last Week’s Selloff Wake Up Investors to the Overvalued Market? El-Erian Asks

Allianz sage spells out the difference between lowered fundamentals, like earnings, and the current rally.


At long last, now is the time that momentum-besotted investors may pay attention to corporate America’s wobbly fundamentals, proclaims Mohamed El-Erian, the chief economic adviser at Allianz.

Looking at the market slide late last week, El-Erian wrote in a Bloomberg opinion piece that stocks “were poised for a pullback after five consecutive monthly gains.” As we start a new week, the issue is whether investors will do what they’ve done in previous pullbacks and buy the dip—or start to evaluate stocks by their fundamentals.

The S&P 500 suffered a 2.3% drop last week, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite went down 3.3%. Even mighty Apple, the world’s most highly valued company by market cap, pulled back 6.5%.

To be sure, earnings are expected to be deeply down for the third quarter, with FactSet estimating a 22.4% shrinkage (versus the second period’s 31.7% fall). The fourth period is projected to post a 14% loss. The larger question, which El-Erian is asking, is: How long can the disconnect between economic reality and market behavior persist?

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

To El-Erian, two forces have propelled the market’s steady ascent since its pandemic-panic low point in March: Federal Reserve policy and derivatives trading.

The Fed, of course, has lowered short-term rates to near zero and propped up the bond market by buying, not just mortgage-backed securities and Treasuries as it has in the past, but corporate bonds, too. These actions have made bonds across the board generate lower yields. That in turn has led to TINA: the acronym for “there is no alternative” other than stocks.

As El-Erian put it: “Years of ample and reliable liquidity injections by central banks and their strong signaling of continued and exceptionally loose monetary policy have conditioned investors to buy on the dip.”

On the lesser-discussed derivatives front, the trend has been toward ever-rising prices, a phenomenon that has fed on itself. In mid-August, the volume of stocks sold short—meaning a bet they would decline—was around a third of what it was in March, according to Nasdaq.

El-Erian pointed out that call buying has burgeoned. In other words, more investors have expected stocks to go up, and put in orders to buy them as they rose. What’s more, he said, volatility lately has been increasing, which is more often seen in a falling market than a climbing one.

On top of that is the difference between the market, with the S&P 500 recently hitting a new high, and the economic picture. While unemployment has come down since the scary days of the first quarter, it still is elevated. Consumer confidence is low.

El-Erian observed that “the pace of improvement has moderated and hopeful expectations for a V-shaped recovery” have evaporated. Instead, he wrote, we are left with “both less upbeat short-term projections and greater concerns about longer-term damage to the vitality of supply and demand.”

At some point, though, investors will turn to fundamentals and see that the current rally has spiraled too high, he said. “If that doesn’t happen now because of residual central bank conditioning, it will” later, and the result may be more painful. That, he went on, will “involve an even larger downturn.”

Higher anticipated junk bond defaults and dropping sales are large burdens to overcome, he cautioned. Eerily, he stated, “investors are not being rewarded enough to underwrite the risks associated with continued pressure on corporate revenues and higher chances of default.”

“Where investors end up in this tug-of-war” between undue investor optimism and poor corporate performance, he wrote, “will depend largely on their investing DNA — do fundamentals influence their behavior, or have years of liquidity conditioning obliterated what was once almost canonized for them?”

Related Stories:

As Virus Punishes Stocks, El-Erian Warns: Don’t Buy the Dips

Stock Market’s Rise Doesn’t Jibe with Overvalued P/E, Stovall Warns

Overvalued Stocks: What Would Make Sky-High Multiples Drop?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«