New York Comptroller and Colorado Pension Fund Named Lead Plaintiffs in Boeing Suit

The two collectively hold around $200 million in shares in Boeing, which they charge with ignoring safety issues around the 737 MAX for years.

New York’s comptroller, who oversees its State Common Retirement Fund, and the Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado (FPPAC) have been appointed co-lead plaintiffs suing Boeing for failing to monitor the safety of its 737 MAX airplanes.

The two, which together hold around $200 million worth of Boeing stock, were chosen by a Delaware judge from a number of different investors that are all seeking damages from the world’s largest aerospace company, according to the complaint. They allege that current and former Boeing board members and executives breached their fiduciary duty by repeatedly ignoring safety issues until they were “no longer even a topic of discussion in board meetings.” 

Among the signs that board members purportedly disregarded? In 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration grounded an entire class of airplanes—the 787 Dreamliners—for the first time in more than 30 years after a series of battery fires. In 2014, the National Transportation Safety Board said a Boeing 777 crash in 2013 was due to automated systems Boeing did not fully explain in its training manuals. That same year, an investigation found that Qatar Airways was not accepting 787 Dreamliners because of safety concerns. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Inattention to safety around the newly automated software resulted in the fatal crashes around the Boeing 737 MAX, the suit alleged.  Two crashes not even five months apart killed 346 passengers. In October 2018, Lion Air Flight 610 fell into the Java Sea and 189 passengers and crew died. In March 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 went down six minutes after takeoff and left no survivors. 

Regardless, Boeing’s then-CEO and Chairman Dennis A. Muilenburg repeatedly denied to board members and the public that there were any safety issues, the suit said. After the 2018 Lion Air crash, the plaintiffs contended that he unfairly collected unvested equity-based compensation of more than $38 million. 

That led to what plaintiffs called an “epochal corporate governance catastrophe.” 

“Board members and top executives failed in their responsibility to heed the warning signs, leaving Boeing’s finances severely damaged and its once-proud reputation in tatters,” New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement. 

“As co-lead plaintiff with our partners, we look forward to this opportunity to hold the company leadership accountable for their derogation of duty to the company and indifference to public safety,” he added. 

“We are determined and ready to pursue claims of malfeasance against the officers and directors of Boeing,” Dan Slack, executive director of the FPPAC, added in a statement. 

Other changes that led to the erosion of corporate culture, the suit stated, include the 1997 acquisition of McDonnell Douglas, another aerospace company, headed by Harry Stonecipher, who became the new president of Boeing. The suit said that he helped shift the corporate culture to profits-first, moving the corporate headquarters to Chicago, away from its long-time home in Seattle “to escape the influence of the resident flight engineers.”

Boeing declined to comment. 

Boeing stock took a while to be affected. But as the pressure on the company mounted, it began sliding in February 2019, when it was at a peak of $440 a share. It stabilized at around $340 per share in February 2020 before the pandemic crushed markets. The stock is now roughly half that level, at just $170.

As of March, the New York pension fund, the third-largest in the nation, listed about $194 billion in assets. The Colorado fund had about $6 billion. 

Related Stories: 

At Least Boeing’s Stock Isn’t in Its Pension Plan Anymore

Airline Stocks Fly High Despite Boeing MAX Mess

Boeing Production Cut Will Pare Half-Point from GDP, Says JPM Economist

Tags: , , , , , ,

Public Funds Lead Institutional Investment Rebound

Funds with significant exposure to equities outperformed during the second quarter.


Institutional plan sponsors posted a median plan return of 10.6% during the second quarter as markets rebounded from the COVID-19 pandemic-induced first quarter crash thanks to a strong performance by US equities, according to the Northern Trust Universe.  

The Northern Trust Universe tracks the performance of more than 320 large US institutional investment plans that have an aggregate asset value of more than $1 trillion.

Public funds outperformed the other institutional segments tracked by Northern Trust, earning a median return of 11.14% during the quarter. That was followed by corporate ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act] pension plans, which had a median return of 10.55%, and foundations and endowments, which posted a 9.24% median return during the quarter.

The Northern Trust US equity program universe reported a 22% median gain for the second quarter, which was the highest quarterly return in at least 20 years. Meanwhile, US fixed income, which is another major holding for most plans, had a median return of 4.7% for the quarter, led by corporate and high yield bonds, which increased 10% or more for the period.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

With 36.9% of plan assets in fixed income, corporate ERISA pensions had the largest median fixed-income allocations at the end of the second quarter. The US equities allocation was 28.2% of the median ERISA plan assets, which is an increase of 4.6% from the prior quarter, but is down from a median allocation of nearly 33% five years ago. International equity median exposure was 9% in the second quarter.

With a median US equity exposure of 34.2%, public fund plans had the highest allocations to equities at the end of the quarter, while their median allocation to international equities was 15.5%, and their median exposure to US fixed income was 24.7%.

“Investors’ willingness to take on additional risk propelled returns in the equity and corporate fixed-income sectors,” Mark Bovier, regional head of Investment Risk and Analytical Services at Northern Trust, said in a statement. “Institutional plans with higher allocations to those sectors benefited from the risk exposure, while alternative asset classes trailed in relative performance during the quarter.”

Foundation and endowment plans had a median US equity allocation of 28.6% for the quarter, while their median exposure to US fixed income was 10.9%, and their median international equity exposure was 9.5%. Their median allocations for private equity and hedge funds were 15.1% and 11.6%, respectively.

For the year to date, public fund plans had a 3.8% total plan loss and a one-year median return of 1.9%. Equities were down 7.4% year-to-date and down 0.6% over one year, while fixed-income investment plans for public funds returned 3.2% year-to-date, and 6.1% over one year.

Foundation and endowments had a 3.6% total plan loss year-to-date, but were up 2% over one year. Their equities were down 6.9% year-to-date, and up 1.1% over the year, while fixed income returned 2.6% year-to-date, and 4.4% over one year.

Related Stories:

Increased Investor Risk Appetite Spurs Endowment Index Q2 Rebound

US Public Pensions Bounce Back from Dismal First Quarter

Northern Trust Joins Asset Servicing Unit to BlackRock’s Aladdin

Tags: , , , , ,

«