New Jersey Likely to Cut Pension Contributions, S&P Global Says

The credit ratings agency downgraded the state one notch, to A-, and gave it a negative outlook.

New Jersey is highly likely to reduce or delay its public pension contributions because of the coronavirus, according to a report from S&P Global Ratings that downgraded the state one ratings notch. 

Analysts said there is a “significant possibility” there will be a reduction or postponement in contributions, given the extraordinary pressure the nation’s worst funded retirement system is putting on New Jersey’s already constrained budgets, according to a Wednesday report from the credit rating agency. 

The report gave the state an “A-,” down from an “A,” with an outlook for future rating actions moving to negative from stable.

For New Jersey, ongoing revenue losses may well result in another credit downgrade. S&P Global Ratings analysts said there is a 33% chance the state will see its score cut once more within the year. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The state, which has a high income per capita, had already been making strides to reduce its structural deficits in health care and other spending.

But the coronavirus has compounded the state’s financial problems, including its large debt and its unfunded pension liabilities. The state pension fund is roughly 40% funded. 

Even before the economic fallout, the state had budgeted just 70% of its annual actuarially determined contribution (ADC) for the pension fund, the report said. 

The state’s high contributions have constrained New Jersey’s budget, which has lost tax revenues at a time when health care and unemployment costs are spiking to address the public health crisis. 

Fearful of budget cuts, lawmakers have been appealing for additional federal aid for state governments in the next fiscal relief package. New Jersey has already suspended nearly $1 billion in state spending. 

On Thursday, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy met with President Donald Trump in the White House, seeking expanded testing for the coronavirus, as well as financial aid for state governments. 

“We don’t see this as a bailout, we see this as a partnership,” the governor said during the meeting. “Doing the right thing in what is the worst health care crisis in the history of our nation.”

Murphy said the state needs $20 billion to $30 billion just to keep police, firefighters, and other public workers on its payroll. 

Meanwhile, state lawmakers in Illinois have also recently asked for state bailouts, including $10 billion to fulfill its contribution obligations for its pension funds. 

But that has attracted controversy from Republican members of Congress, who have been critical of state bailouts, making it unlikely to pass a GOP-controlled Senate. 

Related Stories: 

New Jersey Freezes Nearly $1 Billion in Spending Over COVID-19

New Jersey Is Enlisting State Pensioners to Return to Work

$10 Billion Illinois Pension Bailout Request Ignites Controversy

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Public Pension Fund Debt Expected to Reach ‘All-Time High’

Retirement systems will  struggle with meeting their required contribution targets, Pew report says.

US pension funds, burdened with precarious funding ratios before the COVID-19 outbreak and large drops in the public equity market value, are finding their debt loads climbing, according to a new report from Pew Charitable Trusts.

“Absent positive returns in the next three months, overall state pension debt, currently $1.2 trillion, could increase by $500 billion, reaching an all-time high,” the report said. “The pressure to meet pension funding targets will be most acute in jurisdictions that had severely underfunded pension systems before the pandemic took hold. In Illinois, for example, nearly one in five state tax dollars is already going to pay for pensions before factoring in any revenue declines.”

Public pension funds are generally expected to struggle with meeting the required contribution targets they’ve established to keep their portfolios solvent as a result of their declines in revenue, but there’s an underlying issue that could extend the time frame for recovery, the organization said.

The funds must adhere to their contribution targets that are usually set at least one year in advance, meaning an appropriate target commensurate with the current status of the pension fund will lag until the pension’s board approves it for the following period.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“This means this effect will not be immediate,” Pew said.

A pattern of reduced assumed rates of return, a fundamental calculation that pension funds use to determine how to adjust their operations and targets to become or remain solvent, are expected in the near term as well.

“These reductions would continue the three-year trend [of reduced assumed rates of return], which already saw assumed annual return rates decline from 7.5% to 7.2%,” Pew said. The organization suggests that long-term returns would be closer to 6.5%, even before factoring in the pronounced effects of the coronavirus fallout.

Related Stories:

Corporate Pension Funding Ratios Nearly Flat in 2019 Despite 17.3% Returns

OCIO Roundtable (Part 2): Surprises and Best Practices through COVID-19

Japan’s GPIF Seeking Active and Passive Managers for Foreign Bonds 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

«