NASRA: ALEC Report Contains ‘Serious Flaws’

Association says study on public pension funding was ‘contrived’, and ‘cherrypicked’ data.

The National Association of State Retirement Administrators, (NASRA) has rejected the findings of a recent report on public pension funding from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), saying the findings contain “serious flaws.”

The ALEC report claimed that US public pension plans are far more underfunded than they report, and that the aggregate unfunded liability of all plans exceeds $6 trillion, with a funding level of approximately 33%. However, NASRA said that using “current, prevailing actuarial methods” for valuing liabilities, public pensions report an aggregate unfunded liability of approximately $1.5 trillion, and a funding ratio of around 70%.

NASRA said its main problems with ALEC’s report on 280 state-administered public pension plans is that its conclusions are based on the use of a below-market, risk-free interest rate to calculate the funding condition; it “erroneously states” that using a risk-free rate for funding is endorsed by the Society of Actuaries; and it “ignores the variable nature of benefit structures and financing arrangements in many public pension plans,” rather than assign all public pension liabilities and costs to employers and taxpayers.

NASRA also argued the report implies that only a few states have enacted modifications to their retirement systems, “even though every state has recently made changes to one or more of its pension plans,” and claims that public pension reporting and transparency is inadequate, “when, in fact, public pensions are highly transparent and a public database of state level plans already exists.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

ALEC’s report used a discount rate “derived from a short, cherrypicked time period,” said NASRA, which was calculated using a “so-called” risk-free investment return of 2.14%. NASRA said a risk-free rate “is not helpful for calculating pension funding information,” and that the outcome of this calculation should not be used to characterize plans’ funding condition.

“By ALEC’s admission, this is a synthetic rate manufactured by averaging the yield on 10- and 20-year bonds from April 2016 to March 2017,” said NASRA, “an unconventional window to measure financial data, and one that featured atypically low rates even in the current low-rate environment.”

It added that the rate used by ALEC is lower even than the current yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds, which is just under 2.5%, and that rates used for corporate pension plans are currently around 4.0%.

“It is only through the use of a rate as low as the one used in the report that ALEC finds ‘every single state would be considered at risk of defaulting on their pension obligations,’” said NASRA. “Using current interest rates, particularly from such an oddly brief and irrelevant period of time, to calculate long-term funding requirements, and to characterize the funding condition of a pension plan that will continue to operate for decades, is incongruous with the way plans actually are funded.”

Tags: , , ,

Facing Police Shortage, NM Considers Pension Changes

As Santa Fe expands city turf, it co-sponsors supportive resolution.

New Mexico’s Republican Gov. Susana Martinez said she will back bills that support police officers being able to return to work while earning pension pay, and it’s causing a ripple into the cities. 

On Wednesday, the City Councilors in Santa Fe  co-sponsored a resolution expressing support if state legislation allowed police officers to return to work while still collecting retirement benefits. Councilman Chris Rivera said the change could help the ongoing shortage of police officers in the city.  

“We’re in a dire crisis and we really need to diversify our options,” Rivera told CIO.

Santa Fe city is expanding, and annexing more land, which widens the area for police officers to cover, a spokesman told CIO. Currently, police officers are retiring at a young age and still want to work, said Rivera, and laws could allow it if they limited high salaries and upper rank progression to post retirement re-hires.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

In New Mexico’s largest city, Albuquerque, the mayor has stated that he wants to add 400 police officers to the force. Albuquerque police officers can retire after 20 years with 70% of their pay.

Pensions for people returning to government work were frozen in New Mexico in 2010 out of fear that ‘double dipping’ would increase costs to taxpayers if people came back to work and were re-promoted to the high salaries they retired from. But there is a strong push by public safety for laws to change back to stem the ongoing shortages of police and fire personnel. Changing the return to work policy was brought up last year but “didn’t get far” in the legislature, said Rivera.  

“The legislature is concerned with return-to-work provisions because they negatively impact the pension funds,” Ann Hanika-Ortiz, principal analyst, Legislative Finance Committee of the State of New Mexico, told CIO in a phone interview. “Using the pension funds to solve recruitment and retention issues is probably not a good idea over the long term, especially when you have underfunded pension systems, which we do in New Mexico.”

However, a scenario that would not negatively impact the fund would be to create parameters that kept police officers from accruing additional benefits while they’re re-employed, and to require them to suspend their cost of living adjustment (COLA) while they’re re-employed. New Mexico provides a 2% fixed compounded COLA, and all other return-to-work public employees have to suspend it, said Hanika-Ortiz.

In 2013, the pension reforms included an incentive to delay retirement that increased the maximum pension amount from 80% to 90% of one’s average final salary. According to analysis by the Public Employee Retirement Association, “the incentive could mean an additional half-million dollars in lifetime retirement benefits by working an additional five or six more years,” said Hanika-Ortiz.

 

Tags: , , ,

«