More DC Menu Options, More Problems

Research shows participants save nearly $10,000 more per person when offered fewer fund choices.

When it comes to defined contribution (DC) plan design, less is more.

A smaller menu of pension fund options can lead to greater total savings for retirees, according to research by Wharton School benefits specialists Donald Keim and Olivia Mitchell.

Their study focused on a large US nonprofit’s plan streamlining effort. The result? A smaller slate of options produced aggregate savings of $20.2 million over a 20-year period, or $9,400 per participant.

“Too many choices may create confusion, resulting in poorly-informed consumer decisions,” Keim and Mitchell argued. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

A large menu of funds led to participants selecting “inadequately diversified” portfolios, and also discouraged participation altogether.

“A more succinct, reduced lineup not only makes things simpler but it actually improves decision-making.” 

In the Wharton case study, the nonprofit began with a slate of almost 90 mutual funds, including equity, target date, and bond index funds, as well as real estate investment trusts (REIT), commodities, and other sector funds. During the overhaul, the employer eliminated 39 of these options from its DC menu.

The new plan design had four tiers: Tier one, the default option, consisted of 13 low-cost target date funds (TDFs); tier two included four index-linked funds, and tier three comprised 32 stock and bond funds of varying risk categories, plus a private equity REIT. The final tier was a self-directed brokerage account, which participants could opt into to regain access to the closed funds, as well as thousands of other mutual funds.

Following the simplification, plan participants significantly reduced their allocations to stock, sector, and international funds and shifted their contributions mainly to TDFs—resulting in portfolios that were “better balanced and less risky,” Keim and Mitchell wrote.

Additionally, the streamlining led to reductions in portfolio turnover, expense ratios, and the number of funds held by participants, contributing to greater total savings.

One of the country’s largest DC plans has gone much further than the studied nonprofit. 

The University of California’s investment office has narrowed its DC lineup from 100 options down to just 16, including TDFs, according to associate CIO and COO Arthur Guimaraes.

“A more succinct, reduced lineup not only makes things simpler but it actually improves decision-making,” Guimaraes told CIO. “That’s been important.”

But he also cautioned that a simple fund menu isn’t a cure-all for securing the well-being of plan participants.

“The problem with DC is that members run the risk of running out of money,” Guimaraes said. “If you can crack that nut and guarantee people income… I think that’s the real next frontier.”

Related: American Failure &Why Isn’t Defined Contribution… Better?

European Pensions Refocus on Property

Continental institutions’ interest in real assets shows no signs of abating.

Danica Pension has struck a deal with Aberdeen Asset Management to manage €1.3 billion ($1.4 billion) within its local property portfolio.

The mandate commences from February 1, 2016, and includes 107 residential and commercial properties in Denmark. It represents more than a third of Danica Pension’s €3.3 billion in real estate assets. The pension fund manages DKK 316 billion ($46.4 billion) in total.

As well as this mandate, Aberdeen will take over responsibility for €5 million of property development projects on behalf of Danica, the asset manager said in a statement.

“The aim will be to optimize the value of the property portfolio through active management, while the current property administrator will continue to be responsible for letting and administration,” Aberdeen said.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Separately, Sweden’s AP3 has established a joint venture with property specialist Balder in order to invest in residential real estate for the first time.

AP3 CEO Kerstin Hessius said there was a “great need for new housing” in Sweden to cater for the country’s growing population.

The venture should open for business in the first quarter of 2016, AP3 said in a statement, subject to regulatory approval.

The two deals follow a busy year for European institutional investors in the property sector.

In August, fellow Swedish pensions AP1 and AP2 teamed up with asset manager TIAA-CREF with the aim of investing up to €4 billion in real estate.

Norway’s Government Pension Fund—Global, the world’s biggest sovereign wealth fund, has been making its case for doubling (or even tripling) its targeted allocation to the asset class.

A survey of 600 investors by Colliers International found that 57% of European respondents planned to increase their allocation to property in 2016—although this was lower than the previous year’s figure of 64%.

At the end of March 2015, data firm Preqin estimated that $730 billion was invested in unlisted real estate globally, including $221 billion of unused cash. Of the $730 billion, 29% was focused on European assets.

Related: Investors Pile into Real Assets as Record Numbers Seek Funding

«