Minnesota Foundations Collectively Drive Impact at Home

Kick off collaborative efforts towards impact by committing more than $17.1 million to a fixed-income bond fund.

Minnesota foundations are joining forces and putting investment dollars to work to help their neighbors. The Minnesota Council on Foundations (MCF), which includes members such as the McKnight Foundation, Bush Foundation and Otto Bremer Trust, has announced a collaborative effort toward impact investing targeting affordable housing and small business lending throughout Minnesota.

“For several decades, many of our Minnesota foundations have been doing impact investing on their own, long before the term was even coined,” Susan Hammel, MCF’s impact investing executive in residence told CIO Magazine.  “In 2014, we convened them for the first time and they realized there was a lot to gain from working together and learning from each other. Collaborating is part of our Minnesota DNA, especially in philanthropy…As impact investing has taken off and gone increasingly mainstream, our foundations wanted to take the informal connecting and information sharing to the next level.”

The foundations kicked off their collaborative efforts towards impact by committing more than $17.1 million to a fixed-income bond fund, which is expected to exceed $20 million. The bond fund, Access Capital Community Investment Fund, is managed by RBC Global Asset Management. “This money strengthens Minnesota’s market for affordable housing and small business securities, and grows the number of Minnesota-based foundations involved in impact investing,” Hammel, stated in a release. “The fund will have impact locally, but because it reaps nationally diversified returns, it will not have overly localized risk.”

RBC was selected from four firms through a competitive bid process that involved data collection, analysis, manager interviews, and assessment, according to Hammel. “RBC has a long-time commitment to this region and knows the market well,” she said.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The investment fund has a track record of investing in US agency-guaranteed, mortgage-backed securities and government-backed loans that support affordable rental housing, small businesses, healthcare, education, and job creation. The strategy had more than $1 billion in assets under management as of the end of last year.

Hammel anticipates that the commitment will lead to other impact opportunities. “We are hoping this is the first of many and are exploring other opportunities such as a low-interest-rate loan pool for CDFI’s (Community Development Financial Institutions Funds), social businesses and nonprofits, and perhaps a private equity fund,” she said.

Tags: , , , , ,

Pennsylvania Gets on Indexing Bandwagon

State treasurer expects the move to save the state about $5 million a year in fees paid to managers.

Joining the growing trend towards indexing, Pennsylvania is moving its $2.4 billion in public equity investments into passive investments. Pennsylvania Treasurer Joe Torsella expects the move to save the state about $5 million a year in fees paid to managers who frequently underperform the market, cut down in investment risk, and also provide a better return to the state’s taxpayers.

According to Torsella, “I took an oath to put the public’s interests first, not Wall Street’s. Study after study has shown that a passive investment approach for stocks, by dramatically reducing the costs to taxpayers, has a high likelihood of performing much better than a high-fee active investment approach over the long term.”

The state will gradually transition its public equity holdings, about $1 billion of which is actively managed, to passive investments over the next six months. The passive investing approach is gaining in popularity and has become a “strategy of choice,” according to the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business.

While there are some active managers who are adept at beating the market for any defined period, it is difficult to find those who achieve this feat consistently. Another factor that sways Torsella towards passive investing is  the difficulty in identifying those managers who will outperform in the future, aslooking at past performance does not help.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

He said he would prefer not to make a casino game of investing public funds in an attempt to beat the market. Rather, his aim is to “capture the underlying market return at the lowest possible cost.” To this end, he sees the “broad strategic allocation of investment funds” as the most important decision for an investment portfolio. “We can’t control investment performance or consistently beat the market, but the one variable we can control is costs – and I have a fiduciary obligation to taxpayers to do so,” Torsella noted.

Supporting Torsella’s move, Standard & Poor’s research finds that in the most recent 10-year period, more than 87% of actively managed US stock funds did not perform better than a broad market index. During this same period, most international stock funds did not beat the market either.

Another advocate for passive investing is Warren Buffett. He has asked investors to take this route, considering that even many institutional investors and wealthy people have paid out billions of dollars in recent years to hedge funds and other money managers that charge high rates for substandard performance.

According to Buffett, “The bottom line: When trillions of dollars are managed by Wall Streeters charging high fees, it will usually be the managers who reap outsized profits, not the clients. Both large and small investors should stick with low-cost index funds.”

 

 

 

 

Tags: , ,

«