Milton Friedman, Ha! ESG Sentiment Won’t Ruin Companies Long Term

That’s the argument from our symposium panelists, who say sustainability boosts stocks both now and into the future.


How best to convince companies that sustainability is vital to their futures and to their stock performance, as well? That was the question experts on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing wrestled with at CIO’s 2021 Symposium on Wednesday.

Hovering over the session was the ghost of Milton Friedman, the famed University of Chicago economist and Nobel laureate, who postulated that the duty of a corporation was to make money for its shareholders. Friedman’s precept is often used as justification by opponents of ESG investing, who say bowing to sustainability thinking will result in crimped earnings.

Our panelists argued that ESG investing is the best approach to ensuring that corporations thrive in the future, and now, too. Companies that blight the environment, mistreat and discriminate against employees and others, and run their businesses in a high-handed manner will not be winners in the fullness of time, the panelists argued.

“There’s a lot of skepticism in the US about ESG, but not in Europe, Australia, or Japan,” said Christopher Ailman, CIO of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS). “It’s sad to see this short-term thinking in the USA.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

To Ailman, anti-ESG types are misreading Friedman (who died in 2006). The economist “said the role of a company was to make money, but he didn’t say over what period. He didn’t mean over just 90 days; he meant over the long term,” the CIO reasoned.

The notion that ESG isn’t practical or obtainable at the moment rankled Del Stafford, BlackRock’s head of US iShares portfolio consulting, and the panel’s moderator. “Long-termism isn’t about perfection today,” he said. “And we can’t wait around for 30 years” to get a handle on any problems.

What’s more, ESG-oriented stocks did better during the pandemic-induced stock plunge of last spring than the broader market, noted Linda-Eling Lee, head of ESG research at MSCI. Her firm’s ESG ratings are a well-followed measure of corporate behavior. “That showed their good track record,” she said about sustainability-oriented shares. “They were resilient during the sell-off.”

Nowadays, there are a host of different techniques and measurements to guide ESG, she said. “We have more choices and analytics,” Lee declared, thanks to three decades of data. “We have flood maps and modeling” procedures that didn’t exist before or in as much depth.

“ESG is not hype,” said Eric Van Nostrand, head of research for sustainable investments and multi-asset strategies at BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager. The task ahead is to “identify forward-looking bullet points” that will compel ESG action.

CIO Ailman made the case for not simply divesting stock in companies that have problematic ESG records. Rather, he contended, the better course is to stay invested and seek to influence them with the leverage that comes with being a major shareholder.

His CalSTRS, for instance, has pushed ExxonMobil, one of the biggest US oil companies, to elect four outside board members who would aim to move Exxon toward cleaner energy. 

Tackling the agendas of the US’s and the world’s enormous number of companies can be “daunting,” said BlackRock’s Stafford, yet worthwhile.

Register now to watch the symposium’s in-depth conversation on replay.

Related Stories:

CFA Institute Launches Certificate in ESG Investing

The Hodgepodge of ESG Investment Standards Sparks Controversy

CalSTRS Lambasts Exxon’s Red Ink and Carbon Capture Venture

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Investing in Bitcoin Is Like a Venture Capital Play, Virginia Pension Chiefs Say

Allocators from two Fairfax County plans favor managers with a ‘multi-strategy approach’ to both VC and cryptocurrencies. 


Gaining exposure to cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies can be part of an overall venture capital (VC) play, rather than a direct investment strategy into a single asset, according to two public pension fund investment chiefs from Virginia’s Fairfax County. 

The strategy has performed well for the investors, who have gained exposure to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin through investments in several private equity funds. The two allocators were quick to point out that they are investing in the underlying technology, rather than placing bets on which cryptocurrencies will rise to the top. 

“It was more just looking at it from the technology and innovation perspective,” said Andy Spellar, investment chief at the Fairfax County Employees’ Retirement System. 

He, and his colleague Katherine Molnar, CIO at the Fairfax County Police Officers Retirement System, shared their insights Wednesday during a panel at the 2021 Virtual Chief Investment Officer Symposium. The event was moderated by Chief Investment Officer Managing Editor Christine Giordano. 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Both investors said they are “very happy” with their investments. Several years ago, the pair invested in the Morgan Creek Blockchain Opportunities Fund I, a private equity vehicle that raised $17.1 million from investors in 2018. The fund now is up “between 3.5 to 4.5 multiples of domestic capital,” according to Molnar. 

That was enough to get the pair to re-up into the same asset manager’s Fund II a year later. CIO Molnar went a step further than Spellar by doubling her police fund’s target in Fund II to 1%, up from 50 basis points (bps) in Fund I. 

Other firms the two investors have gained exposure to? Coinbase, which recently had its initial public offering (IPO), and a blockchain firm for loans and mortgages called Figure, as well as a bank for cryptocurrencies known as BlockFi. 

Molnar’s county police retirement system also put another 1% of assets into a separate fund manager called Blockchain Capital for its Fund V, which has a combination of venture capital investments and some liquid cryptocurrency. The pension fund now has 2% of its assets allocated to the space, up from 50 bps in 2018. 

The investment chief said she could see the allocation growing even higher. Thus far this year, the extra blockchain exposure has helped Molnar outperform her colleague Spellar’s employees’ retirement system “just by a hair.” 

“It has everything to do with the fact that I sized our blockchain exposure larger than he did on a relative basis,” said Molnar.  

“She killed me,” Spellar said. 

The peers have maintained similar asset allocations, preferring risk allocations to capital allocations, meaning the funds have had less equity risk over the years. Generally speaking, this means the two pension funds have lagged behind their peers during market rallies, but have performed better during downturns. In the two-year period following the financial crisis, the funds were the top public funds in the nation. 

Going forward, the asset owners said they will continue to invest in managers that deal with both cryptocurrency and venture capital, rather than investing in each asset class separately. “We quite like that combination, and tend to think of it as almost like a multi-strategy approach,” Molnar said. 

Spellar and Molnar expect it’s “prudent” to start developing relationships with other asset managers that deploy similar strategies as Morgan Creek. 

The two peers work within a county retirement structure made of three systems, including the Fairfax County Uniformed Retirement System. That set-up has helped them pool their assets—nearly $5 billion in the county employees plan and $1.7 billion in assets in the county police plan—to negotiate better fees from managers. The two have a 7.25% target to meet. 

“When we are speaking to a manager, we’ll negotiate capacity on behalf of all three systems. We’ll negotiate fees, you know, especially at tiered fee structure,” Molnar said. “So it does give us some leverage.” 

Working together has also helped the two allocators communicate the investment to their trustees, who were skeptical when they were first considering it in 2018, as the funds were exploring their first investment with Morgan Creek. At the time, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies were unproven investments and not considered appropriate for public pension funds. 

The two allocators allayed concerns by inviting trustees from all three pension systems along to their meetings with the manager. By the time the investment chiefs introduced the fund manager at board meetings, the trustees had sat through the same presentations directly from the asset manager. “I think that went a long way,” Spellar said. 

“Our skill sets are very complementary. So you tend to just end up working on a lot of things together approaching portfolio construction and manager selection,” Spellar said. 

Register now to watch the symposium’s in-depth conversation on replay.

Related Stories: 

Coinbase Has a Splashy Debut, Bitcoin Is Soaring … But Fund Managers Are Downbeat

Pension Fund Increases Its Blockchain Technology, Bitcoin Allocations

FBI Arrests Alleged Operator of Longest-Running Bitcoin Laundering Service

Tags: , , , , , ,

«