Michigan Retirement System Sues Generac Over Solar Power Defect

Class action alleges company executives failed to disclose faulty solar component.



A Michigan retirement system is suing energy technology company Generac Holdings Inc. and some of its executives for allegedly failing to disclose material information by hiding from investors a defective component central to its solar power products.

The lawsuit, filed in December 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin by the Oakland County Employees’ Retirement System and the Oakland County Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association, alleges Waukesha, Wisconsin-based Generac and certain executives concealed from investors a defective component of its SnapRS product, which is intended to rapidly shut down solar devices in certain dangerous situations.

The Pontiac, Michigan-based retirement system brought the securities class action on behalf of all Generac investors, and the deadline to apply for lead plaintiff status was Monday.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

“Rather than protecting consumers, the SnapRS would overheat, melt and, in some cases, start fires,” alleges the Oakland County complaint. “Defendants knew that the versions of the SnapRS installed in thousands of homes were defective and dangerous. Numerous consumers filed complaints with regulators, and Generac’s business partners that sold, installed, and serviced Generac’s solar products informed the company of the SnapRS defect.”

The Michigan lawsuit alleges that instead of warning investors and consumers, Generac continued to tout the success and reliability of its solar energy products while “quietly” making minor modifications to the SnapRS, including issuing a firmware update. “After these modifications failed to fix the SnapRS, defendants continued to mislead investors,” the suit alleges.

Generac relied on channel partners to sell, service and install its solar battery storage systems, including Power Home Solar, also known as Pink Energy. The lawsuit alleges Generac misled investors about its dependence on Pink Energy, “falsely assuring investors that no single customer or partner drove more than 6% of its sales and that Generac had a broad and diverse network of distribution partners.”

The lawsuit says investors began to learn about the defective component in August 2022, when Pink Energy filed a lawsuit against Generac that alleged the company’s “defective” SnapRS components caused millions of dollars of damage and led to Pink Energy going bankrupt.

Following Pink Energy’s October 2022 bankruptcy filing, Generac reported in its preliminary financial results for the third quarter of 2022 that it faced pre-tax charges of approximately $55 million “related to a clean energy product customer that has filed for bankruptcy.”

The pension funds’ lawsuit alleges the disclosures caused a 25% drop in Generac’s share price, which fell another 8% when it released its Q3 2022 earnings and cut its sales guidance for its solar energy business by approximately 40% due to the loss of a major customer.

“We are still reviewing the allegations in the case but intend on vigorously defending ourselves in the matter,” a Generac spokesperson told CIO. The spokesperson would not comment further, as the litigation is pending.

Related Stories:

Michigan Pension Fund Sues Credit Suisse Over Risk Exposure

Swedish Pension Fund AP7 Sues Microsoft, Activision Over Takeover Deal

Florida Pension Funds Sue Barclays Over $17.6 Billion Debt Over-Issuance

Tags: , , , , ,

Bloated Inventories Turning Into Economic Hindrance, Pantheon Says

The pandemic buying surge prompted businesses to stock up way too much.

 

 

 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.


Remember when buying toilet paper was a problem? Now, warehouses crowded with excess goods will shrink the U.S. gross domestic product in 2023’s first half, according to Pantheon Macroeconomics.

Wholesale inventory edged up by 0.1% in December 2022, adding to a glut that will hinder company performance, the research group warned in a note. While inventory expansion is slowing, it has not reversed yet, which is bad news for the retail trade. The result will be a 2% GDP contraction in the first quarter, Pantheon predicted. The firm did not have a specific forecast for April through June.

Nonetheless, “Wholesalers now have too much inventory; the inevitable correction will be a drag on H1 GDP growth,” wrote Ian Shepherdson, the U.K.-based firm’s founder and chief U.S. economist.

The situation marks the decline of the just-in-time supply operational method that once prevailed. It first broke when the pandemic created a demand surge that overwhelmed the system and led to shortages. In response, retailers massively expanded their orders—and now, with demand slowing, there’s an overabundance.

Wholesale inventories of durable goods expanded 20.8% in December 2022, while sales rose just 6.4% in November, the latest data available, Shepherdson pointed out. The problem is that the longer goods sit in storage, the more they lose in value for businesses. It’s a money drain to store merchandise for long spells. When the stuff eventually is sold, it is usually at a steep discount.

The demand slowdown “is likely to continue over the next few months, at least,” the Pantheon report declared. The study sketched out how the Federal Reserve’s ongoing campaign to raise interest rates is gradually eroding the public’s zest for purchasing products. Thus, it went on, “consumers’ spending continues to shift away from goods—the backlog of vehicle orders excepted—and into services.”

One positive sign Pantheon noted is that auto sales have rebounded. That is likely because long-term financing rates have leveled off (unlike short-term rates, which the Fed is still ratcheting up).

More broadly, the supply dilemma is part of the reason that reported S&P 500 profits for last year’s final quarter are dipping. Earnings per share are estimated to have slid 5.3% in Q4 2022, pending all companies reporting, by the count of FactSet researchers.

It’s hard to say how long warehouses must wait to clean out their excess supplies. For inventory-laden businesses, that day can’t come soon enough.

 

Related stories:

Has the Pandemic Prompted Inventory Discipline in Retail?

How Stock Investors Can Play the Supply Chain Snarl

Why Corporate Execs Have the Supply Chain Blues

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

«