Maybe Those 3 Delisted Chinese Stocks Will Be Reinstated After All

Kicked off the NYSE under Trump, the companies could get a second chance under Biden, a Schwab strategist says.


Remember how the Trump administration forced the delisting of three big Chinese stocks from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)? Well, it’s possible that, under the Biden White House’s less-confrontational stance toward Beijing, the trio might return.

So says Jeffrey Kleintop, chief global investment strategist at Charles Schwab. This week, he wrote in a client note, the three telecom firms—China Mobile, China Telecom, and China Unicom Hong Kong—are eligible to be reviewed for reinstatement. “The NYSE may send valentines to China” soon, he wrote, just after that romantic holiday.

Neither the companies nor the exchange, let alone the new administration, is talking about what the next step will be. But the general Washington wisdom is that President Joe Biden, while willing to confront the Chinese regime on the economic, national security, and human rights fronts, will be less hardline elsewhere. Like in the investing realm.

The whole question here revolves around investor angst over whether any moves to profit from China’s burgeoning economy will end up being trampled in any upcoming geopolitical clashes between the world’s two biggest powers.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The back-and-forth drama began in December, with the NYSE announcing it would delist the three companies’ American depositary receipts (ADRs), instruments that allow US trading of foreign shares.

This move was to comply with then-President Donald Trump’s executive order in November that designated these telecoms as Chinese “military companies.” Then on Jan. 4, the NYSE reversed its decision after discussing the matter with regulators.

But, after Trump pressured the exchange, it did another pivot and again imposed the delistings. This caused a lot of agita on Wall Street, especially among the providers of stock indexes: MSCI, FTSE Russell, and S&P Dow Jones Indices. They scrambled to remove the banned companies from their benchmark lists. Word was that more Chinese companies also could be delisted.

What’s the scenario for getting the three companies back on the NYSE? “President Biden could rescind the executive order at any time,” Kleintop noted. Or that move could be made further down the Washington power structure, and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen could revamp the Trump directive.

And even if the administration doesn’t act, Kleintop contended, the NYSE itself could yet again reverse its decision, pending further review. Trump’s original executive order did not mandate delisting.

At first, Kleintop opined, Trump may merely have wanted to see investors punish the three companies’ share prices. Then he chose to ladle on an extra layer of punishment and push the NYSE into delisting the three.

Turns out, however, that the three telecoms haven’t seen their shares suffer at all. On the Hong Kong exchange, where they do most of their trading, all three stocks have notched gains thus far this year. In fact, Kleintop stated, the average daily US trading in these stocks over the 12 months before the NYSE delisting is a small fraction of their Hong Kong trading volumes.

No one has addressed whether the three companies are actually linked to the Chinese military or intelligence agencies or, if they are, to what degree. But a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry responded to the Trump-impelled delisting this way: “The suppression against Chinese companies will have very limited direct impact on them, but will harm the national interests and image of the United States and the global standing of the American capital market.” 

Related Stories:

Investors’ Dilemma: Buy Stocks in Growing China, or Not?

Ray Dalio Sounds the Alarm about a Rising China

Why It’s Time to Make a Standalone China Allocation, Willis Says 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Denmark’s ATP Makes Forays into Social Bonds

The pension giant dipped its toe into the increasingly popular instruments with a €95 million investment in 2020.


Denmark’s $156.1 billion pension giant ATP said it has made its first investments in social bonds to include in its sustainable portfolio. The pension fund made the announcement while reporting near-record earnings results for 2020.

“In 2020, we decided to take it one step further and expand our universe to also be able to invest in social and sustainable bonds,” ATP Chief Executive Bo Foged told journalists at a press conference following the release of its annual results, according to Reuters.

Social bonds are any type of bond instrument in which the proceeds will be used exclusively to finance or refinance in part or full new and/or existing eligible social projects, such as ending child labor or improving food security and access to education. The sustainable investing instruments have become increasingly popular during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to S&P Global Ratings, which said social bond issuance had quadrupled during the first half of the year when its growth was outpacing that of green bonds.

The firm also said that total social bond issuance stood at $71.9 billion as of October and could approach $100 billion for all of 2020. However, financial market data provider Refinitiv has an even more robust view of the market, estimating that the total issuance of social bonds reached $164.2 billion in last year, nearly 10 times more than in 2019. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

ATP is looking to have DKK50 billion (US$8.15 billion) invested in sustainable investments by the end of this year, including its existing investments of DKK30 billion in green bonds, according to Reuters, which cited Foged as saying the pension invested €95 million ($114.9 million) in social bonds in 2020.

The pension fund recently reported 2020 investment returns of 23.3%, or DKK29.9 billion, which was the second highest return in the pension giant’s history. As a result, the fund’s total net asset value rose to DKK959.8 billion as of the end of the year.

“ATP’s returns have to contribute to pensions in the long term. In order to deliver, our investment decisions must be sustainable—that is, they must have long-term durability,” Foged wrote in ATP’s annual announcement of financial statements for 2020. “This makes sustainability a central and integral guideline for ATP.”

Foged added that he is often asked if sustainability and solid returns are not opposites, and that “the response is no; to me, the two are insolubly linked.”

Related Stories:

Pandemic Spurs Investor Interest in Social Bonds

ATP Gets a Bitter-Suite Shakeup

Japan, European Development Bank Launch Social Bond Initiative

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

«