Malinowski: ESG Policy Changes at BlackRock an Improvement

Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System removes the largest money manager from its watchlist.

The board of the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) has removed BlackRock from its watchlist, saying that the world’s largest money manager has made changes to address its proxy voting and how it engages with corporations on their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) records.

BlackRock was placed on the Seattle pension system’s watchlist in December 2016, show board minutes. SCERS Chief Investment Officer Jason Malinowski and other investment staffers had argued that the money manager should be put on the list because of ESG concerns, show meeting minutes.

Jill Johnson, investment strategic advisor with the Seattle system, noted back in 2016, “Specifically, SCERS is concerned with BlackRock’s: (1) reticence to oppose management; (2) limited focus on environmental and social issues; (3) inconsistency between their proxy voting record and internal policies and public pronouncements; and, (4) limited transparency on investment stewardship activities.”

Malinowski told CIO Tuesday afternoon that policy changes by BlackRock were responsible for the money manager being removed from the watch list.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“We think our discussions and those of other institutional investors caused them to rethink their position and make positive changes, “ Malinowski told CIO. “We would call it a success.” Ironically, before joining SCERS in 2014, Malinowski worked at BlackRock as a managing director, head of risk and quantitative analysis for alternative investments.

The pension system approved the removal of BlackRock from the watchlist by a 5-0 vote at its meeting on  Dec. 13, according to meeting minutes. SCERS has $356 million of its $2.9 billion in assets under management invested in BlackRock MSCI World ex-US Fund, a passive index fund strategy.

As the world’s largest money manager with an AUM of more than $6 trillion, BlackRock is typically the largest shareholder in corporations around the world. Its positions, which can amount to 5% or more of a company’s holdings, are significant. Consequently, its influence has put the spotlight on the company’s proxy voting record at corporate annual meetings.

ESG shareholder resolutions calling for greater disclosure around climate change, particularly at oil and gas companies, are expected to continue to put the spotlight on BlackRock as the 2019 proxy season gets underway.

Malinowski provided CIO with a staff memo explaining why the money manager was taken off the watch list. The memo cited BlackRock’s vote yes management of ExxonMobil and Petroleum at the company’s 2017 and 2018 annual meetings, and in favor of shareholder resolutions calling for more disclosure on climate change risk. SCERS also voted against management and for more disclosure.

Back in 2016, it was BlackRock’s vote against shareholder resolutions calling for climate change stress testing at Exxon Mobil and Chevron that helped put BlackRock on the SCERS watch list, according to meeting minutes. SCERS had supported the stress testing.

The SCERS Dec. 13 memo said that BlackRock was reluctant to challenge management before 2017, and that until then, it had never voted in favor of a climate disclosure requirement that was opposed by corporate management.

The memo said that has changed partially, given the money managers’ votes against management at the two large oil companies.

“BlackRock’s support of climate-related shareholder resolutions remains limited, but it does highlight that there are certain instances where the firm is willing to oppose management,” it said.

The SCERS memo said that while BlackRock Chairman and CEO Larry Fink had sent a 2016 letter to corporate CEOs on the importance of ESG, “this support was not reflected in the firm’s own proxy voting. The ESG emphasis did not appear to be uniformly integrated throughout the company, perhaps because the investment stewardship function had previously been of limited size and relevance to the firm.”

It goes on to say that “the situation has improved” with company vice chairwoman Barbara Novick expanding her executive role to oversee investment stewardship, Michelle Edkins, global head of investment stewardship, relocating to BlackRock’s New York headquarters, and a doubling of staff on the investment stewardship team. The team consists of approximately 40 professionals, the memo says.

The SCERS memo also says that BlackRock has improved transparency on its engagement positions with corporations, publishing on its website its positions and explanations on its votes on key shareholder resolutions.

The pension system’s removing BlackRock from its watch list will not take the spotlight off the asset manager. Advocacy groups continue to argue that BlackRock has not done enough to challenge companies on their ESG records.

BlackRock argues that it has made ESG a priority, but it also believes in engaging companies before taking proxy voting stances.

Malinowski said it’s clear that BlackRock has made progress since it was put on the SCERS watch list over its ESG activities.

 “No one is perfect,” he told CIO. He said he believes BlackRock’s record will continue to improve over the next few years as it builds on its improved ESG record in 2017 and 2018.

Tags: , , ,

Endowment Index Falls 9% in 2018

Recession fears, trade wars, rate hikes, and a strong dollar weigh down index.

The Endowment Index calculated by Nasdaq OMX fell 9.09% for the year ended Dec. 31, compared to a 4.38% drop in the S&P 500 for the same period, and a 17.6% gain for the index in 2017. For the fourth quarter, the index tumbled 10.22%, compared to a 13.52% decline in the S&P 500.

The down year was attributed to the confluence of a slew of negative factors, such as a stronger US dollar, which weighed down international and emerging markets during the second half of the year; global recession fears, US Federal Reserve rate hikes, higher interest rates, a slowdown in corporate profits, and an escalation in the US-China trade dispute.

The year had started out looking like a continuation of 2017, with strong gains and low volatility as the index rose 5.51% through Jan. 26. However, concerns over rising US interest rates and a US-China trade war led to a correction in global markets that saw the index close out the first quarter relatively flat. The index edged lower for the second quarter, before rebounding slightly to end the third quarter up 2.04%. However, slumping markets in the fourth quarter helped the index end the year in the red.  

Only three of the index’s 19 components posted gains in 2018 as international developed fixed income returned 2.94%, US T-Bills gained 1.70%, and managed futures rose 0.32%. Meanwhile, eight of the index’s components posted double-digit losses for the year, led by emerging markets-China, which plunged 28.05%, commodities-timber, which fell 21.11%, and commodities oil & gas, which ended the year down 19.36%.

The index is based on the portfolio allocations of more than 800 educational institutions managing over $500 billion in total assets. Each of the 19 sub-indexes that comprise the index are investable, with more than 30,000 underlying securities within those sub-indexes. The current target allocation is 52% alternatives, 36% equity, 8% fixed income, and 4% liquidity.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Tags: , ,

«