Madoff Trustee Sues ADIA for $300 Million

The trustee charged with recovering funds for victims of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme has sued the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), alleging it received $300 million from a major Madoff feeder fund.

(August 12, 2011) — Abu Dhabi’s sovereign-wealth fund has been sued by a court-appointed trustee recovering money for investors cheated by Bernard Madoff.

The lawsuit, filed on Thursday by Madoff trustee Irving Picard in US Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan, is seeking to recover $300 million, and marks the first time Irving Picard has targeted a sovereign wealth fund in the scandal.

However, unlike many other lawsuits that Picard has filed in the past year, according to the Financial Times, the claim against the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) does not allege that the sovereign wealth fund’s managers knew or should have known that Madoff was a fraud. Instead, the suit claims that ADIA invested in Madoff’s massive Ponzi scheme through the Fairfield Sentry hedge funds, withdrawing $300 million in 2005 and 2006. A trustee can seek the return of money withdrawn in the six years before a business collapses, according to US bankruptcy law.

With 95% of its assets deposited in the scheme, Fairfield Sentry was the largest Madoff feeder fund.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

“Defendant ADIA claims that identifying and managing risk plays a central role in every stage of its strategic and day-to-day decision making. Further, defendant ADIA claims to monitor its investments and fund managers on an ongoing basis,” the complaint said.

While the Abu Dhabi fund does not disclose its net worth, its sum is estimated to be roughly $627 billion, making it the largest sovereign wealth fund in the Middle East, Picard noted. The case is Picard v. Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, 11- 02493, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

Picard has filed roughly 1,050 lawsuits seeking more than $103 billion for Madoff victims. Picard’s suit against ADIA follows a federal judge’s decision last month to limit his ability to pursue Madoff Ponzi scheme third parties, such as HSBC, which Picard sued for $9 billion. The judge ruled that the trustee cannot seek damages against third parties for failing to detect the fraud.

Earlier this week, the Connecticut Appellate Court ruled that the town of Fairfield cannot seek the millions of dollars in losses to its pension fund as a result of Madoff’s fraud scheme.

“Although the plaintiff’s complaint is rich with allegations that the Fairfield Greenwich defendants acted in concert with Madoff or in furtherance of Madoff’s fraudulent plan, it is devoid of any allegation that the Fairfield Greenwich defendants played any role in inducing the plaintiffs to invest in the Maxam Fund or in any other feeder fund, or with Madoff directly,” Judge Thomas A. Bishop wrote in the court’s decision obtained by the Daily Fairfield.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Opposite Views on US Real Estate by Danish Scheme and CalPERS

Denmark's largest pension fund, ATP, and the largest pension fund in the US have made opposite moves in regards to US real estate.

(August 12, 2011) — Denmark’s largest pension fund, ATP, and America’s biggest scheme, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), have conflicting views over real estate in the United States.

ATP has made recent commitments to real estate funds in the US. Through its subsidiary ATP Real Estate, the scheme committed $65 million to the UBS Trumbull Property fund, managed by UBS Realty Investors, IPE.com reported. The commitment was signed in June, marking ATP Real Estate’s second investment with UBS. Additionally, the Danish scheme made a commitment of $80 million to the Morgan Stanley Prime Property fund in March — the pension’s first investment with the firm. Also in March, the scheme committed $90 million to a core US real estate fund managed by Invesco Real Estate.

Meanwhile, in the US, CalPERS is looking to temporarily drop its real estate allocation. While its current interim target to real estate is 10%, it plans to drop the target to 8% until December 31, according to agenda materials for the system’s August 15 investment committee meeting.

The $235.9 billion scheme’s new real estate strategic plan is primarily focused on high-demand core, cash-generating properties.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Despite CalPERS’ reduced allocation to the sector, institutional investors have started amping up their allocations to real estate in the US. In June, the CIC reported that as incomes rise in emerging markets with energy demands expected to climb, it is targeting mining, real estate, and infrastructure investments in the Americas.

Similarly, Equity One and New York Common Retirement Fund entered into a joint venture in May to acquire grocery-anchored neighborhood centers.

“This venture provides us with a highly regarded capital partner who shares our long term perspective on the ownership of institutional quality shopping centers,” stated Jeff Olson, Chief Executive Officer of Florida-based Equity One, which has 177 shopping centers, 10 development or redevelopment properties, nine non-retail properties and five land parcels. “This new alliance will enable us to continue our strategy of upgrading and diversifying our portfolio into the most densely populated, supply constrained markets of the country,” he said.

“We had about a 40% drop in property valuations from its peak in 2007 to the bottom of the cycle which occurred in the beginning of 2010,” Mercer’s Allison Yager told aiCIO in March, following the decision by the $13.6 billion Aviva Staff Pension Scheme to up its allocations to real estate-related assets to 15% over the next two years. “Since then, investors have returned to the real estate market and made sizable commitments, but there’s no way to know if we’ll ever return to the pre-crisis peak.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«