Lost Opportunity for UK Pension Funds

By failing to renegotiate fees they charge, fund managers are losing the chance to save more than $151 million annually in fees.

(March 16, 2010) – Despite an overwhelming willingness to negotiate fees with investment managers, even for relatively small mandates, UK pension fund trustees failed to take advantage of this, a survey by consultancy Lane Clark & Peacock (LCP) showed.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The result: Trustees are losing more than $151 million in savings a year for their members.

“Trustees and their advisers should demand that investment managers make changes and demonstrate value for money,” said Mark Nicoll, partner and author of the report, to the Financial Times.

According to the survey, management of pooled funds is one area where trustees often pay higher-than-expected fees, facing up to 30% higher manager fees per year. The study found management fees should be one-quarter of its current level.

LCP said it was disappointed about a lack of transparency, with nearly one-third of managers failing to disclose information to their clients. “Trustees should seek full disclosure of fees and charges for all of the pooled funds that their managers hold,” the report stated.

Additionally, LCP revealed there has not been a large increase in the total level of fees paid by UK pension funds, partly due to the tremendous growth of passive as opposed to active management by funds for equities and bond mandates. An estimated one-third of the assets of UK occupational pension funds are now managed on a passive basis.

The survey, conducted in the fourth quarter of 2009, studied 68 UK fund managers overseeing more than 80% of the UK’s occupational pension fund assets.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

CalPERS Board Removes Shareholder Proposal Limit

The largest US pension fund voted to lift the limit on the number of shareholder proposals its staff can issue and announced plans to increase the accountability of directors through a majority vote policy.

(March 16, 2010) – The board of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the nation’s biggest state-run pension fund, voted Monday to remove the limit on the number of shareholder proposals its staff can issue to companies in its portfolio.

 

CalPERS’ shareholder proposals often detail a certain course of policy-related action that it would like a company to take. Until the vote earlier this week, the fund’s old limit was up to 10 proposals a year for governance issues, and up to 20 proposals a year for issues related to executive compensation. CalPERS will now be allowed to submit as many proposals as it deems necessary.

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The 13-member CalPERS board also voted to ask 58 of its largest US companies in its global equity portfolio, including Apple, Google, and Coca-Cola, to voluntarily adopt a new majority vote standard when selecting directors, according to a news release published on the fund’s Web site. The new approach would permit shareholders to block uncontested candidates from being elected to company boards, Reuters reported.

 

CalPERS’ actions reflects an increase in the accountability of directors and the pension fund’s likely greater influence among publicly traded companies. Its attempts to push for reform shows the fund’s reputation of leveraging its investing power to urge changes in corporate governance.

 

“The majority vote standard is an effective tool to hold directors accountable for creating shareowner value and encouraging better shareowner-director communication,” said CalPERS Board President Rob Feckner in a statement. “Many companies have already adopted this rule on their own, and we hope that others will do so in the coming weeks.” The new rules would grant shareholders greater power over the direction of the company, as more votes would be required to win a seat.

 

Anne Simpson, who leads the CalPERS Corporate Governance Program, said that CalPERS expects a positive response from companies, and she anticipated that board members will welcome the positive mandate that majority voting brings. “This is not a shot gun approach,” she said. “Too often, board appointments look more like a coronation than election. This sets the stage for accountability, which is critical for all sides.”

 

In related news, the Sacramento-based fund appointed George Diehr as chairman of its investment committee, Reuters reported. In February, he was re-elected as vice president of the fund. The CalPERS committee also approved Rogerscasey Inc and Wilshire Associates as finalists in the system’s search for a general investment consultant, supporting a plan to increase the surveillance and scrutiny of middlemen.

 

CalPERS has about $205 billion in assets under management and administers retirement benefits for more than 1.6 million active and retired State, public school, and local public agency employees and their families.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«