Lawmakers Propose Portable Retirement Accounts Bill

The PRIA Act is intended to help Americans avoid losing retirement funds when changing jobs.


Rep. Jim Himes, D-Connecticut, and US Sen. Mark Warner, D-Virginia, have reintroduced legislation intended to create universal, portable retirement and investment accounts for all Americans.

Under the Portable Retirement and Investment Account Act of 2021, or the PRIA Act, every American would receive a “PRIA” at the same time they receive a Social Security number. PRIAs would be administered by an independent board and managed by selected financial institutions. After the creation of the initial account, accountholders would have the option to choose investment options from a qualified financial institution.

Employers could contribute to their employees’ PRIAs just like 401(k)s, but employees who separate from their employer would still have the ability to contribute to the same PRIA plan as before. PRIAs are intended to supplement the existing retirement system and provide a portable option, so people would still be able to keep their 401(k)s, individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and other savings plans if they choose.

“PRIA is going to bring people in from the cold,” Himes said in a statement. “Instead of seeing themselves fall further and further behind in their retirement savings, millions of Americans in nontraditional employment arrangements will have another tool in their retirement toolbox.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The act would also establish a Portable Retirement and Investment Board to be headed by a presidentially appointed director. The board would consist of three members appointed by the secretary of the Treasury, three named by the secretary of Labor, two by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), and one appointed by the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Hines originally introduced the PRIA Act in October 2018, but the bill never made it past the House Ways and Means Committee.

Research from investment manager Vanguard shows that when 401(k) participants change jobs, those with smaller balances often do not roll over retirement savings into their new plans or tax-advantaged vehicles. Additionally, when a participant leaves a job with less than $5,000 in a 401(k), employers can transfer small balance accounts out of the plan and into a safe harbor IRA, where fees can be higher. Vanguard said this can result in a proliferation of stranded safe harbor IRAs, participant cash-outs, and forfeiture of future savings and returns.

“The current retirement system isn’t working for all Americans,” Himes said. “The options to which American workers have access can differ significantly based on their area of employment, and the systems can be needlessly confusing. In addition, many Americans lose access to retirement savings vehicles if they lose their jobs, and gig, contract, and part-time workers are often ineligible. PRIA changes all of this.”

Related Stories:

Senators Reintroduce Bills to Bolster Retirement Savings

Retirement Support Could Be Included in $2 Trillion Infrastructure Bill

Senate Bill Targets Women’s Retirement Savings Inequities

Tags: , , , , , ,

SEC Reportedly Subpoenas PSERS Over Alleged Compensation, Gifts

The regulator is also seeking information on a financial misstatement from 2020 that triggered a contribution increase.


The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has subpoenaed records from the $66 billion Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) to determine whether improper “compensation and gifts” may have been offered to the pension fund’s staff, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. The SEC is also reportedly investigating a financial misstatement from last year.

PSERS has declined to comment on the report. The SEC did not respond to a request for comment.

The move follows subpoenas the FBI reportedly sent to Pennsylvania’s largest pension fund in May. It was seeking evidence of kickbacks and bribes in an investigation of PSERS’ misstatement of its 2020 returns, as well as a real estate investment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

During a meeting in March, PSERS management informed the board of errors in the data used to perform the calculation of its fiscal 2020 returns in December that were found by its investment consultant. At that December meeting, the board’s general investment consultant and another firm reported that the retirement system’s nine-year performance figure was 6.38%, which was just above the 6.36% threshold that triggers additional contributions under state law.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The board ordered a review of all performance data to identify any additional errors, after which it was determined that the actual nine-year performance figure was 6.34%, which meant an automatic increase in contributions would kick in. And in April, PSERS decided to recertify the employee contribution rates due to the financial reporting misstatement.

The Inquirer reported that the SEC subpoena sent to PSERS was the first indication that investigators are looking into possible presents or money from investment advisers and consultants. State employees are forbidden from accepting such gifts.

In June, the fallout from the probe prompted six out of 15 members of PSERS’ board of trustees to call for the removal of pension plan Executive Director Glen Grell and Chief Investment Officer James Grossman Jr. However, the demand was pulled by board members shortly after.  

Related Stories:

FBI Said to Seek Evidence of Kickbacks, Bribery at Pennsylvania PSERS

PSERS Recertification Triggers Contribution Increase

Pennsylvania PSERS Hires Law Firms to Probe Reporting Error

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«