Knowing They Were Selling “Crap,” UBS under Siege in CDO Case

Despite internally acknowledging that some of their CDOs were “crap” and “vomit,” UBS still sold such instruments to unwitting investors—and now are being sued for doing so.

(September 17, 2009) – A case that will be of interest to all who purchased collateralized-debt obligations (CDOs) and other asset-backed securities from investment houses is working its way through the Connecticut court system.


UBS, the Swiss-based bank, is being sued by Pursuit Partners, a Stamford-based hedge fund, over the sale in 2008 of CDOs that quickly became worthless. Pursuit already has won a $35.5 million pre-judgment lien against UBS Securities and UBS AG, an amount equal to what the fund lost when investments it bought from the bank collapsed last October.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.


According to documents released in the discovery phase of the case, internal messages between UBS employees labeled such investments “crap” and “vomit.” UBS allegedly also knew of pending ratings downgrades that would severely mitigate the value of such instruments, but the CDOs were apparently still recommended to the hedge fund. According to lawyers involved in the suit, similar investments believed to be “crap” were likely pushed on others, including public pension plans.


UBS allegedly made the sale in order to get the securities—which it allegedly knew to be on the cusp of a downgrade—off their books. According to a pre-trial decision issued by Connecticut Superior Court Judge John F. Blawie, UBS had an “awareness that…high-grade securities on its hands would soon turn into financial toxic waste.” The firm, the Judge noted, “had reason to believe that Moody’s was changing its methodology and that would result in the downgrading of certain asset-backed securities.” Nevertheless, UBS continued to sell such securities to hedge funds and others from when this became apparent—May, says Blawie—until at least October 1, when Pursuit stopped buying.


Such a pre-judgment lien is likely to incite more lawsuits from those who feel they were sold CDOs and other such securities without complete disclosure of information. “I think the court’s finding of probable cause…is likely to prompt many purchasers of CDOs and similar instruments to commence lawsuits here in Connecticut against the sellers of such securities,” Harold Finn, of Stamford’s Finn, Dixon & Herling, told the Connecticut Law Tribune. “They haven’t been doing so heretofore.”


Lawyers for the plaintiffs agreed. “We’re pretty sure that this same kind of—to use UBS’s term—“crap” and “vomit” were sold to other hedge funds and pension funds, so the state of Connecticut, as well as hedge funds in Connecticut likely have been sold the same kind of CDOs,” said Gary S. Klein of Stamford’s Sandak Hennessey & Greco, counsel for the hedge fund.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

Following the SWF Trend, Mongolia Jumps in

The poor, landlocked country’s willingness to set up a long-term investment vehicle for resource profits lends credence to the idea that the SWF model has taken hold worldwide.

 

(September 17, 2009) – Absent the financial crises, the financial story of the last two years is likely to be the rise of sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). As if to cement this fact, Mongolia—a landlocked country of 2.5 million—has become the latest country to lay the groundwork for such an investment vehicle.

 


According to Bloomberg, the government of Mongolia will set up a fund using mining royalties and tax revenues with the aim of alleviating poverty in the country with a GDP per capita of just $3,500, according to the International Monetary Fund.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

 


“The fund, to be run by professional managers from 2013, will disburse part of its annual income to every Mongolian in cash or non-cash securities to let them own stakes in the country’s mining wealth,” Mongolian Finance Minister Sangajav Bayartsogt told Bloomberg. Initial capital will be taken from mining royalties and the taxes that mining companies pay the government. The government is looking at other SWFs—the Alaska Permanent Fund and the Alberta Heritage Fund are being noted as models—as it works its way through the planning stages, and likely will build a structure that both pays dividends to citizens and invests for the long term.

 


Mongolia has stated that it wishes also to avoid Dutch Disease—where currency appreciates due to demand for one export product, making other industries less competitive internationally—which might result from its reliance on mining. “If mining is booming, the rest of the sectors will slow down because people are expecting to receive work and revenue from mining,” Bayartsogt told Bloomberg. “We will use revenue from mining to develop the processing industry, invest in outsourcing, education, science, and technology to move up the value chain and transform the economy.”

 


The fact that Mongolia—one of the world’s poorest nations—is embracing the SWF model lends credence to the idea that long-term investment of resource wealth is taking hold worldwide. Other funds established in the last two years alone include France’s Strategic Investment Fund, The Sovereign Fund of Brazil, Malaysia’s Terengganu Investment Authority, the China Investment Corporation, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the China-Africa Development Fund, and the Emirates Investment Authority.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

«