Kentucky Public Pensions Lose 5.7% in Fiscal Year 2022

Despite the loss, the commonwealth’s pension funds just beat out their benchmark’s performance.


The pension portfolios managed by the Kentucky Public Pensions Authority, which serves state and local government employees and the state police, lost a collective 5.7% net of fees for the fiscal year that ended June 30. However, the pension funds’ performance just beat that of their benchmark, which lost 5.8%, according to a press release.

The KPPA, which serves more than 400,000 participants, oversees the County Employees Retirement System and the Kentucky Employees Retirement System Hazardous and Nonhazardous plans, as well as the State Police Retirement System. As a result of the loss, the year-end market value of all funds was $21.6 billion, a $1.1 billion decrease from the end of fiscal year 2021, which saw record investment performance among all funds.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

However, the state pension authority said in the release that despite the losses, the pension portfolios managed by KPPA outperformed most of their peers, per analysis by consultant Wilshire. The release also says KPPA outperformed most of its peers in terms of risk-adjusted returns.

“In a turbulent and challenging year for markets, we were able to produce strong relative risk-adjusted returns for participants and outperform our benchmark by maintaining our disciplined investment approach,” KPPA CIO Steve Willer said in a statement. “We are well positioned to take advantage of market opportunities over the coming quarters.”

For the fiscal year, the CERS Nonhazardous and Hazardous pension portfolios lost 5.9% and 6.1% respectively, but beat their benchmarks, which lost 6.4%. The KPPA release attributes the plans’ relative outperformance to strong security selection, specifically in the specialty credit, private equity and core fixed-income portfolios. However, it also says this was partially offset by allocation positioning, as its underweighting of real return assets cost the portfolio approximately 135 basis points of relative performance.

Meanwhile, the KRS portfolios, which are made up of the KERS Nonhazardous and Hazardous and SPRS pensions, lost 5.1% during the year, falling short of the benchmark’s loss of 4.8%. More specifically, the KERS Nonhazardous and SPRS portfolios lost 5.2% and 4.6% respectively, compared with their benchmarks’ 4.8% loss, while the KERS Hazardous portfolio lost 6.0%, below its benchmark’s loss of 5.2%, according to the pension authority’s June 2022 performance update.

The KPPA release says the KERS Nonhazardous and Hazardous plans’ performance was hindered by their portfolios being underweight in real estate, real return and private equity, which were the top-performing assets classes during the fiscal year. 

Private equity returned 22.7% for the KPPA pension funds during the year, but because the asset class is reported on a lag, some of this year’s volatility has not yet been reflected in the performance of some of the investments, the release says. It also notes that real estate has been one of the best-performing asset classes for the portfolio, having reported strong returns for several quarters. The real estate asset allocation returned 1.7% during June to bring the fiscal year performance to 28.1%, compared with its benchmark’s return of 27.3%.  The KPPA release attributes the strong performance to continued strength in industrial, multi-family and storage properties.

Related Stories:

Kentucky Public Pensions Authority Names Steve Willer CIO

The Curious Case Against Hedge Funds in Kentucky

Despite Record Returns, Kentucky’s Pensions Remain Severely Underfunded

Tags: , , , , , , ,

A Buybacks Tax Would Have Just Minor Effect, Some Strategists Say

The 1% levy in a Senate-passed bill shouldn’t deter the repurchase trend much, they think.


The Senate just passed a health care and climate measure—called the Inflation Reduction Act—that includes a 1% tax on stock buybacks, which are a shareholder-pleasing endeavor that is popular among companies.

 

Assuming the bill’s buyback tax provision, backed by Senate Democrats, is approved in the House, where the party has a slender majority, its impact on the buyback trend should be minimal, but it could pull forward repurchases that are already planned, according to Wall Street strategists.

 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Buybacks in the S&P 500 have been strong for some time, reaching a record $882 billion in 2021, according to S&P Global. Stock repurchases hit $281 billion in this year’s first quarter, although they fell off in the April-June quarter amid rising recession fears to $233 billion, around a 17% drop. Still, Goldman Sachs has predicted that S&P 500 buybacks will hit $1 trillion next year.

The new levy would reduce earnings per share by around 0.5%, wrote Goldman’s chief U.S. equity strategist, David Kostin, in a client note. 

And that’s not enough to derail the buyback express, say strategists. “I do not see the 1% tax inhibiting corporate buybacks, or dividends due to the additional 1% cost of buybacks,” said S&P analyst Howard Silverblatt to CNBC. 

 

“Overall we don’t expect it to have a huge impact on long-term buyback behavior,” VerityData’s director of research, Ben Silverman, told the financial network.

 

“If it had been 2 or 3 [percent], I think it would have prompted companies to redirect their stock buyback efforts to dividend payments,” Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, said to the Wall Street Journal. “But at 1% I don’t think it’s high enough to dissuade companies from continuing stock buybacks.”

 

Nonetheless, some companies are cautious. JPMorgan Chase axed its buyback program in July, indicating a more careful approach in the face of recession fears.

 

Related Stories:

Do Stock Buybacks Really Shrink Capital Spending?

 Downturn-Spooked JPM Axes Buybacks—So Will Others Follow?

 At Long Last, Dividends and Buybacks Are Starting to Pick Up

 

«