Kentucky Pensions Could Face Insolvency in Five Years

Audit report finds state faces funding shortfall of $33 billion.

Kentucky’s retirement system faces a funding shortfall across its pension systems of $33 billion, and could face insolvency in just five years, according to an audit report from the PFM Group.

“If the commonwealth reverts to the pattern of underfunding the system that it followed from fiscal year 2004 to fiscal year 2014,” said the report, “we project that the [Kentucky Employees Retirement System] fund will be depleted by fiscal year 2022.”

The report said that, based on alternate return assumptions for a 10-year investment horizon and increased liquidity requirements consistent with an updated KRS policy, the unfunded liability would rise to $42 billion. The audit also cited the state’s last-place ranking by Standard & Poor’s with just 37.4% of total current obligations now funded, compared to a national median of 74.6% as of fiscal year 2015, the most recent period reported by S&P.

Kentucky sponsors three major retirement systems covering state, local government, school district, and nonprofit employees across the state. Within the three major systems, there are eight total pension plans.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Although weak investment returns over the past decade contributed to the system’s decline in funding, the auditor said, “the largest single factor underlying the decline was an actuarial funding approach that effectively back-loaded payments such that – even if the commonwealth and other member employers had met all of the calculated actuarial funding requirements each and every year – these payments would still have been less than the annual interest on the unfunded actuarial liability.”

The report also said that each of the plans modified various actuarial assumptions over this period, such as adopting more conservative investment return assumptions and adjusting mortality rates that reflected improving longevity.

“Together, the actuarial back-loading and assumption adjustments drove nearly half of the aggregate growth in underfunding (47%), and led to a majority of the shortfalls in the TRS [Kentucky Teachers’ Retirement System] and CERS-NH [County Employees Retirement System Non-Hazardous] plans.”

The audit report was released just after the KRS slashed its rate of assumptions, a move that will add an estimated $2 billion in debt to the already struggling pension system.

The system lowered its investment rate of assumption to 5.25% from 6.75%, its inflation assumption to 2.3% from 3.25%, and its payroll growth assumption to zero from 4%.

The change in assumption rates means Kentucky is currently $13 billion underfunded for what it is expected to pay retirees over the next 30 years. State agencies will have to contribute nearly 78% of each employee’s salary to the pension fund, up from 50%. That means for every state worker earning $50,000 a year, taxpayers will owe the pension fund $39,000.

Changing the assumptions and making decisions based off the more realistic figures will mean a much bigger actuarially required contribution (ARC) payment will be needed from the General Assembly to shore up the system, according to the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce.

Tags: , ,

Institutional Investors to Boost ESG Investments

North American investors lag behind Asia and Europe in ESG investing.

Nearly 80% of asset managers and asset owners incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into their decision-making, according to a survey from BNP Paribas Securities Services.

The report, titled “Great Expectations: ESG – What’s next for asset owners and managers,” found that among the asset owners incorporating ESG, 46% plan to invest at least half of their assets into funds that incorporate ESG by 2019.

“This represents a significant shift from today,” said the report, “where for 45% of asset owners and for 40% of asset managers, 25% or less of their funds is either invested in or marketed as ESG/RI funds.”

BNP Paribas also cited a trend of institutional investors “moving to the next level” by integrating their ESG investing “across their entire investment value chains,” after limiting their strategies to screening out the “sinful” sectors and/or companies.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

When asked which component has the greatest potential influence on returns, 42% of respondents cited environmental factors. “We think this result shows that organizations are planning ahead to future legislation and the transition to a low-carbon economy,” said the report.

Investors’ concern for ESG issues varied based on geographic region, as “North American institutions are behind their peers,” said BNP Paribas. The survey found that 84% of investors in the Asia-Pacific region and 82% of European investors incorporated ESG into their investment decision-making processes, while that figure was only 70% for North American investors.

Although a rapid increase in the number of ESG funds coming to market is expected over the next two years, the report said that “barriers to even greater wholesale adoption remain,” adding that overcoming these barriers will require action in four key areas:

  • Smarter Analysis: “A lack of robust ESG data is the biggest issue for asset owners and asset managers.” The emphasis must be on developing more rigorous and granular analytics, and stress-testing capabilities. This will assist the investment decision-making processes, bolster risk management practices, and demonstrate long-term performance benefits.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Investors need to understand every ESG-related risk and opportunity associated with the companies and sectors in which they invest. In-depth management and client reporting will also be crucial for firms to identify relevant ESG factors, monitor ESG-related risks, assess performance, and report on the impact of the investments.
  • Talent and Teams: Firms will need to recruit or develop investment talent with the appropriate mix of skills. ESG factors need to be tightly integrated into investment decision-making from the outset. Firms will need to set explicit ESG investment objectives, and then construct an appropriate benchmark and portfolio that mirror those goals.
  • Governance: Clear ESG investment goals and performance expectations, as well as policies to support these, will be essential. They should clearly communicate their selected objectives and policies to their asset managers.

 

 

 

 

Tags: , ,

«