Kentucky Eyes Paying More to Fill Vacant Pension CIO Slot

Right now, the investment head can’t earn a salary above the governor’s $167,000, half what the chief could make elsewhere.


The Kentucky retirement program, currently in the middle of a nationwide search for its next investment chief, wants lawmakers to lift the low ceiling on what it can pay the CIO. 

Modest salaries were the main reason the state pension fund’s most recent CIO, Rich Robben, and deputy CIO Andy Kiehl left at the end of September for investment consulting jobs at Florida-based AndCo Consulting. They are the latest in a revolving door of CIOs.

“They told me in exit interviews that compensation is a big problem. And they said, ‘You can quote us on that,’” Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS) Executive Director David Eager said during a Thursday board meeting.

Attracting investment talent is a tough order for public pension funds, which have to compete not only for a small pool of allocator talent with other defined benefit (DB) plans, but also with the private sector that can offer investors more lucrative salaries. 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

But Eager, who is leading the internal search for the next investment chief, said he hopes to rectify that situation soon. Thus far, the executive director has reviewed 14 candidates for the job, three of whom he said he found well qualified for the job, with résumés still coming in. 

KRS is seeking a compensation waiver for the investment chief position from the state legislature. Under state regulation, Kentucky government personnel, with few exceptions, cannot earn more than the state’s governor, whose salary is $167,000, according to Eager. Former KRS CIO Robben earned $165,000 per year, while former deputy CIO Kiehl took home $159,000. Similar positions at different public pensions can easily offer double those salaries. 

The pension fund is seeking a waiver from the regulation so that it can start offering future investment chiefs more money. Eager said he thinks there’s a strong chance a waiver will be approved by the legislature, which is not expected to start its session until January. 

“If we get the waiver—which I think we will, a pretty strong senator is supporting it—we should be in a lot better position,” Eager said during the meeting. (He did not clarify which state senator was his ally on the issue.)

Location is another matter. About a year and a half ago, KRS moved the investment team office to Louisville from Frankfort, a shift that the fund hopes will attract more candidates because the larger metro area has more to offer.

A salary boost could help KRS halt its revolving door of CIOs. The state retirement system has gone through five of them in the past 13 years, including Robben; David Peden, now a consultant at Mercer subsidiary Pavilion; TJ Carlson, now CIO at Texas Municipal; Adam Tosh, now senior portfolio manager in Alaska’s Bristol Bay Native Corporation; and John Krimmel, now an NEPC consultant.  

Of course, it won’t solve all the problems ailing the struggling retirement system. The fund’s Kentucky Employees Retirement System (KERS) Non-Hazardous Plan, which has a roughly 14% funded status, is the nation’s worst-funded state pension plan. 

But the state retirement system has also stabilized in recent years, particularly after the state government started meeting the full actuarially determined contribution. After reducing the KERS return target to 5.25%, down from 7.5%, the state government increased contributions to the KERS Non-Hazardous pension fund to about $1 billion, about a 70% increase from a roughly $600,000 sponsor contribution in prior years, according to Eager. 

In fiscal year 2019, those changes helped the KERS Non-Hazardous plan generate positive cash flow for the first time in 18 years, according to the comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). It also helped nudge the state pension system’s funded status slightly upward. 

The pension fund is currently managed by the three-person investment team, which includes Joe Gilbert, who oversees public equity; Anthony Chiu, who manages private equity and alternative investments; and Steve Willer, who manages fixed-income investments.

Related Stories: 

Kentucky Retirement Systems Leans into Stocks, Real Estate

Investment Chiefs Leave Kentucky Retirement Systems for Consulting Firm

Kentucky Retirement Systems Returns 1.2% for Fiscal 2020

Tags: , , , , , ,

Think You’ve Got the Risk-Return Mix Down? Guess Again

Many institutional investors trip on undetected hazards, Northern Trust study says.


The trade-off between risk and return is a delicate balance to strike. The now-conventional path to achieve the right balance is diversification of assets. Trouble is, the way many institutional investors do it is self-defeating.

That’s the unsettling conclusion of a new study by Northern Trust Asset Management (NTAM), which finds that many asset allocators, in their quest for good risk-adjusted returns, end up unwittingly exposing themselves to hidden traps.

“Asset managers use the rule of thumb that taking on more risk gets you more return,” said Michael Hunstad, the firm’s head of quantitative strategies. “But they end up with uncompensated risk and no additional return.”

By “uncompensated,” he means investing moves like over- or underweighting a sector, over-concentration on one country, expensive share prices, high fees, and style conflicts. You don’t reap stock gains from these, he warned.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

A key precept of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) is that one can plot the odds of taking too much risk. The theory’s originator, economist Harry Markowitz, won a Nobel Prize for his MPT insights. Unfortunately, Hunstad postulated, hidden risks still lurk undetected, and diversification can be done badly.

An example from the Northern Trust study, which surveyed 64 institutional portfolios: A manager buys a fund for the Russell 1000 value index and one for the Russell 1000 growth index. All that does is give the manager the same outcome as the overall Russell 1000, although with higher fees.

Some 55% of the portfolios that NTAM studied had “material style conflicts,” where similar allocations to the Russell example led to what it called “the cancellation effect.” In other words, the virtues of diversification were watered down if not eliminated. When asset managers went after supposedly can’t-miss return drivers such as high momentum, small size, low volatility, high dividends, or value stocks, they met only disappointment, Hunstad said.

Macro risk is one that too often intrudes in tidy asset allocation models, the study observed. So “energy and financial stocks look affordable,” and seem to be the soul of value investing, Hunstad said. Hence, investors may overweight them. Nevertheless, he went on, oil prices have slid, harming energy companies’ earnings, and low interest rates have made bank profits iffy.

Another mistake: “People want low volatility” stocks, Hunstad continued, “and they don’t realize that they are investing in bond proxies.” That is, stocks that have a lot of interest rate sensitivity—such as real estate investment trusts, utilities, and consumer staples.

“On average,” he said, “they are taking twice the uncompensated risk” that they should.

Related Stories:

Good Vaccine News Has Immediate Impact on the Stock Market

Overvalued Stocks: What Would Make Sky-High Multiples Drop?

A Divided Congress Is Good for Stocks, Study Says

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«