Just Minor Adjustments to Portfolio Are the Smartest Move, 3 Key CIOs Say

A trio of investment chiefs overseeing a half-trillion dollars are preparing their funds for low interest rates without drastically overhauling portfolios.

Three investment chiefs, who hold $500 billion in combined assets, are preparing their funds to handle continuing low interest rates but otherwise expect to make just incremental alterations to their asset allocations.

“I don’t see us fundamentally changing the allocation,” Dan Bienvenue, interim CIO at the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), said during a Monday webinar held by the Council of Institutional Investors (CII).

That sentiment was echoed by Jonathan Grabel, CIO at the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA), and Hershel Harper, CIO at the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust.

Still, the fund leaders are considering sharpening investment strategies in the face of historically low interest rates, and concerns over the Federal Reserve’s continued asset purchases. CalPERS CIO Bienvenue said he’s considering taking leverage on the portfolio.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

The strategy was proposed to board members this summer at the $400 billion fund, which CalPERS’s then-CIO Ben Meng contended would help the portfolio meet its expected 7% rate of return—a tall order.

“It’s got to be diligent and it’s got to be prudent, but that’s certainly something that we’re thinking about,” Bienvenue said. “Strategically taking leverage on the portfolio.”

Bienvenue is specifically considering using leverage to invest more in private equity, private debt, and real assets. By contrast, the fund is steering clear of fixed income.

LACERA’s CIO Grabel also acknowledged that portfolios are becoming increasingly complex to meet higher return thresholds. The investment chief said his fund is checking asset categories to ensure there are no unintended exposures in the $56 billion portfolio. The Los Angeles fund is also drilling down on fees and custodial relationships.

By contrast, UAW’s CIO Harper said his fund does not have the same challenges as the other two public pension funds, given that the portfolio is not required to meet steep return assumptions. The medical benefits trust for auto retirees keeps a heavy allocation in fixed income, about 60% to 70% of the portfolio.

But Harper does worry about any increasing health care inflation in the future, which, without any buffer, could challenge the portfolio going forward. Interest rates that continue to stay low over the next decade or so could also force the fund to rethink its overall asset allocation.

The investment head plans to increase his allocation to investment grade credit and structured products, as well as other alternative strategies that “have a lot less connectivity or correlation back to the market.”

LACERA Beefs Up Its Investment in Chinese Bioscience

UAW Pension Fund Urges Mylan to Bolster Pay Policy

Tags: California Public Employees’ Retirement System, CalPERS, Dan Bienvenue, Hershel Harper, Jonathan Grabel, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA), UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust

Lev Parnas and David Correia, former associates of Rudy Giuliani, were charged with defrauding investors through a company that ironically purported to insure investors against corporate fraud.

According to an indictment filed in the Southern District of New York, the two conspired to defraud multiple victims over the course of seven years by inducing them to invest in a corporate fraud protection firm called “Fraud Guarantee.”

The indictment alleges that Parnas and Correia pitched Fraud Guarantee to potential investors as a company that would provide services to protect investors from fraud. They said Fraud Guarantee would offer an insurance product that would allow policyholders to recoup their losses if they lost money as a result of fraudulent activity. For example, if an investor invested in a company that purchased a Fraud Guarantee policy, he or she would be able to recoup any losses caused by criminal fraud at the company.

The two also claimed that the investors’ funds would be used solely for legitimate business expenses and that they would not take salaries. However, they allegedly withdrew the funds mostly as cash, transferred to accounts in their names or in the names of their spouses or children. It also said they used hundreds of thousands of dollars of investor funds for rent for Parnas’ home, and tens of thousands of dollars to lease luxury cars.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

“‘Fraud Guarantee’ takes on a different meaning in light of today’s allegations that the company was a vehicle for committing fraud, not insuring against it,” Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss said in a statement.

The indictment also alleges that the two made materially false representations about how much money Parnas had contributed to the company and how much money the company had raised overall. For example, at least seven victims invested a total of more than $2 million in Fraud Guarantee based in part on Parnas’ and Correia’s “false and misleading representations,” according to the indictment.

The two could not be reached for comment.

Parnas and Correia were also charged along with Igor Fruman and Andrey Kukushkin in a four-count indictment alleging that they conspired to violate the ban on political donations and contributions by foreign nationals.

In addition to several charges related to violating election laws that carry prison sentences ranging from five to 20 years, Parnas and Correia were charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.