Japan Encounters Calls for Creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund

Seiji Maehara, Japan's ruling party's policy chief, has asserted that the country should set up a sovereign-wealth fund to fight the high yen.

(September 28, 2011) — Similar to recent domestic and international pressure for Australia to create a sovereign wealth fund, Japan is now facing similar urgent calls.

Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) policy chief Seiji Maehara has asserted in an interview with Dow Jones Newswires that the country should consider a sovereign wealth fund to fight the strong yen. Furthermore, he noted that he aims to sell as many government assets as possible to lower reliance on tax hikes in order to help fund earthquake reconstruction. “We would like to consider a national fund, or a so-called sovereign wealth fund,” Maehara said in an interview with the publication, adding that Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda was considering such a move.

While the creation of a sovereign wealth fund in Japan has been favored by some lawmakers, the risks of global investment have thwarted progress. With Japan ranking as having the world’s second-largest foreign reserves (which are held in foreign currencies), Maehara told the Dow Jones Newswires that a sovereign wealth fund that would purchase foreign assets by selling the yen is needed to stem the yen’s strength.

Other countries have faced similar urgency to create a sovereign fund. While trade unions and institutions worldwide have urged the Australian government to create a sovereign wealth fund, the country’s Prime Minister Julia Gillard asserted last month that superannuation is already a trillion-dollar sovereign wealth fund–but with market benefits. She noted that the country’s superannuation regime is robust enough to stand in the place of a sovereign wealth fund.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“That’s because it’s privately managed by thousands of trustees instead of a sovereign wealth fund managed centrally by a Canberra-appointed manager,” Gillard said in an address to the Financial Services Council in Sydney, Money Management reported. “Or alternatively, you could say that Australia has 8 million sovereign wealth funds–the superannuation accounts of Australians across the country.”

This is not the first time that widespread calls for Australia to establish a commodity-backed sovereign wealth fund has been met with stiff resistance. Australia is faced with the question of what to do with the proceeds of a large surge in demand for its vast deposits of coal and iron ore. At the heart of the dispute is whether Australia should try to emulate Norway by establishing a sovereign wealth fund or rather impose a tax on mining profits as the best way of capitalizing on the boom. In May, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) urged Australia to create a sovereign wealth fund to protect the country against a possible Asian market bubble. IMF director Anoop Singh said at the time that the revenue from the current resources boom should be saved “to ensure a more equal distribution of its benefits across generations and reduce long-term fiscal vulnerabilities from an aging population and rising health care costs.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought by Ohio Pensions Against Big-Three Credit Agencies

A federal judge in Columbus has dismissed a lawsuit brought by Ohio’s five public pensions against Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch Ratings.

(September 28, 2011) — Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch have won the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Ohio public employee pension funds.

The judge asserted that the ratings agencies were only offering their opinions, which are protected by free speech. “The Ohio funds make a bare allegation that the ratings agencies knew or should have known that their ratings were false or misleading,” US District Judge James L. Graham in Columbus wrote, according to Bloomberg. “But a complaint must provide further factual enhancement to avoid dismissal.”

The plans named as plaintiffs in the suit were the $75 billion Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, the $66.2 billion Ohio State Teachers’ Retirement System, the $12.3 billion Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, the $10.5 billion Ohio School Employees Retirement System, and the $762 million Ohio State Highway Patrol Retirement System, all of Columbus.

The lawsuit — originally filed by former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray in 2009 — alleged that the ratings agencies all listed the Ohio pensions’ investments as Triple A — misjudgments that cost the Ohio funds upward of $457 million when they purchased securities they believed to be safe but were, in fact, set to fail as mortgage delinquencies rose in 2007 and 2008. According to a release from Cordray in 2009, the rating agencies were making “spectacularly misleading evaluations of mortgage-backed securities due in part to the lucrative fees they received from the same issuers they were supposed to be evaluating objectively.” Furthermore, the statement asserted that numerous people at these firms knew the ratings were incorrect. “We rate every deal,” the statement quoted a rating agency analyst as saying. “It could be structured by cows and we would rate it.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Following the judge’s dismissal of the lawsuit, Michael Adler, a spokesman for Moody’s said the company “is pleased that the court has dismissed all of the claims in this matter.”

Ohio is not the first state to have filed suit against the much-maligned agencies: Mississippi and California have done so, also on behalf of public pension plans pinned with losses after holding mortgage-backed securities and other derivatives that were, in hindsight, clearly incorrectly rated.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«