Is Wall Street Getting Fooled by a CPI Head Fake?

Thursday’s enormous market runup assumes that inflation is on a downtrend. What if that isn’t so?

Word that the Consumer Price Index’s slide to a 7.7% annual pace in October, a much steeper decrease than expected, triggered a blowout market rally Thursday. The S&P 500 jumped by more than 5.5%.

Well, the wonderful world of economic statistics, like stocks indexes, seldom moves in a straight line. “We have been here before, however, with inflation showing signs of slowing in July only to” disappoint later, wrote Josh Jamner, investment strategy analyst at ClearBridge Investments, in a research note.

He has a point. The CPI climbed to an annual 9.1% in June, its highest point in years. Then in July it tumbled to 8.5%. Investors took heart, amid talk that the Fed would ease up. CPI reductions in the next two months were small and unimpressive, though.

The market’s apparent take away Thursday was that inflation will continue to fall, and thus, in the near future, the Federal Reserve will relent on its hawkish campaign to drive down inflation via punishing interest rate hikes—either by halting its increases or pivoting, lowering rates to offset economic problems.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

But Jamner observed that the central bank has given no indication it will desist any time soon: “The upshot: it will likely take further slowing in inflation in the coming months for the Fed to feel fully confident in putting the brakes on future rate hikes.”

Beyond all this is the Fed’s record of pushing down inflation using the blunt instrument of boosting rates. Contrary to the oft-told tale about how Paul Volcker, as Fed chief, tamed double-digit inflation four decades ago with single-minded tightening, history shows he wasn’t that undeviating. He did a couple of pivots, as described in a study by economist Alan Reynolds: once in 1980, to combat a recession then, and again in 1981 and 1982 to help the economy in an even worse downturn.

Despite the Volcker’s inconsistent moves, inflation continued to descend back then. How come? The Volcker Fed’s early high rates and the twin recessions changed Americans’ psychology, which had resigned itself to inflation as a part of life.

As for investors’ reactions Thursday, it could be chalked up to irrational exuberance. That was a phrase coined by Alan Greenspan, in 1996 when he was Fed chair, in reference to that market euphoria of the time. Ironically, he also invented the “Greenspan put,” using Fed actions to halt excessive stock declines. Thus far, today’s Fed doesn’t seem inclined to reprise the Greenspan put.

TIAA/Nuveen Accused of Greenwashing, Violating UN Climate Pledges

Complaint alleges Principles for Responsible Investment signatory owns at least $78 billion in fossil-fuel investments.

 



TIAA and its investment management arm, Nuveen, are facing a formal complaint lodged with the United Nations’ Principles for Responsible Investment that accuses the company of violating its climate pledges by owning “substantial investments in fossil fuels,” among other reasons. Nuveen signed the PRI climate pledge in December 2018.

“We take issue with the significant gaps between TIAA/Nuveen’s claims of responsible investing and its investments in climate-destructive activities,” says the complaint, which was filed last month on behalf of 299 TIAA retirement account holders. It requests that the PRI board “investigate and address both TIAA/Nuveen’s irresponsible investments and systematic green-washing practices.”

In response to the complaint, a TIAA spokesperson said the company believes it is in full compliance with UN-PRI and that it immediately met with the organization when the complaint was filed to provide information and context.

“We are sharing additional materials detailing our environmental, social and governance policies and engagement,” said the spokesperson. “We also offered to be available to PRI as needed for any additional questions.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The filing against TIAA/Nuveen comes as issues related to ESG investment, specifically climate-focused investment, have become increasingly combative, with investors that favor and oppose the efforts targeting asset managers and others for criticism, based on their investments and their commitments to international climate efforts.

In contrast to this complaint, since August, several Republican U.S. senators and state officials have written to asset managers, banks and law firms, objecting to their use of ESG investment principles and commitment to net-zero pledges similar to the UN-PRI climate pledge. Several states have collectively pulled more than $1 billion investments from BlackRock in protest of BlackRock’s pro-ESG stance.

The complaint against TIAA/Nuveen says the firm has at least $78 billion invested in fossil fuels, including “substantial” bond holdings in coal infrastructure, which it says has “led to the expansion of coal mining and the use of coal power.” It also accuses the company of “systematic land acquisitions and land management linked to deforestation, illegality, and human rights violations.”

The complaint said an analysis of TIAA/Nuveen’s investments “indicate significant exposure to assets that are high-emitting or otherwise pose significant climate risk and commensurate financial risk.”  It said that, relative to its peers, TIAA/Nuveen has high exposure to the coal industry through its bond portfolio, and also has high exposure to tropical deforestation and ecosystem degradation through its land-based assets. It calls on TIAA/Nuveen to enact an immediate moratorium on all new direct investments in fossil fuels and all other highly-emitting assets, as well as all new investments in farmland, timberland and industrial agriculture production.

Additionally, the complaint levies greenwashing charges against TIAA/Nuveen, accusing it of providing “misleading marketing of funds with fossil fuel assets as sustainable environmental, social, and governance products.” It also said there was a lack of transparency regarding implementation of its net-zero commitments and that there is a lack of accountability to its stakeholders, “most notably TIAA retirement account holders.”

The complaint further requests UN-PRI to use the “full range of administrative options at its command, including delisting,” TIAA/Nuveen from the list of UN-PRI signatories if it does not resolve the issues.

A TIAA spokesperson said it does not believe that broadly divesting from fossil fuels is the best way it can influence the policies and practices of the companies it invests in, and that it is also not the ideal means to produce long-term value for its investors. The spokesperson also said selling off fossil fuel investments to other companies will not reduce carbon output.

Related Stories:

TIAA Taps Thasunda Brown Duckett as CEO

CEO of UN Principles for Responsible Investment to Step Down

TIAA-CREF Buys Nuveen, Vaults Up AUM League Tables

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

«