Is Volatility Too High?

An S&P Dow Jones Indices director has argued that the Vix index is far higher than “realised” volatility—but the ride will get rougher in the next few months.

The VIX index, which measures market volatility, is actually much higher than the current levels being demonstrated in the S&P 500 index, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Tim Edwards, director of index investment strategy at the company, said the VIX’s current measure of roughly 11.5 was nearly double the 6% annualised volatility actually registered by the S&P 500.

“Although the VIX is a measure of implied, rather than actual, volatility, it still ought somehow to be anchored in realised volatility data,” Edwards said.

“The VIX is currently much, much higher than realized volatility. One interpretation of this is that the market ‘expects’ next month’s volatility to be nearly double what we’ve seen recently. Moreover, the futures market is pricing in an expected gain in the VIX to around 17 by March 2015—nearly triple the current level of realized volatility.”

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Edwards argued that the discrepancy between the two measures was down to the VIX pricing in tail risks that the S&P 500 was not. “The mere possibility of tail events—invisible in current equity valuations—provides the VIX with a different perspective,” he said.

Janet Yellen, chair of the US Federal Reserve, warned last month that ultra-low volatility in markets could “induce risk-taking behaviour that entails excessive buildup in leverage or maturity extension”, which could in turn pose risks to financial stability.

But while the discrepancy between the S&P’s volatility and VIX’s reading exists, Edwards warned that strategies for making money remained risky and “exclusive to the courageous”.

“Selling S&P 500 put and/or call options can realise a profit if volatility proves less than expected, as can taking short positions in either VIX futures or in related exchange-traded products,” he said. But “the risks of such strategies are far from symmetric”, he added: Any unforeseen event to introduce volatility to the market could cause massive losses for any investors who short VIX futures.

Edwards concluded: “Even when profit is possible, or highly likely, dramatic risks remain. Selling volatility remains a strategy exclusive to the courageous. Perhaps that is one reason why the Vix is so high.”

Related content: Smart Beta Winning Fans as Volatility Fears Escalate & Dunatov: Volatility Measure ‘Dangerous’ for Long-Term Investors

Convertible Bonds: Defense Against Downside Equity Risk

Actively managed convertible bonds could provide appealing asymmetrical risk-adjusted returns, Rocaton has said.

Investors looking to protect against downside risk while still taking advantage of an equity bull market could use convertible bonds as equity and fixed income substitutes, according to consulting firm Rocaton.

Convertibles—bonds that switches to equities according to the agreed terms of the security—could provide an attractive asymmetrical return profile, the consulting firm said, by “meaningful upside participation in rising equity markets and less downside participation in falling markets.” 

“Convertibles can play a role in most portfolios given their ability to participate in equity market rallies and limit downside outcomes,” Rocaton’s report said.

According to Rocaton’s data, convertibles have outperformed US equities by 62 basis points annually with 16% less volatility over the past eight years. The current yield for the convertible bond index is also higher than both bonds and stocks, the paper said, at 2.6% compared to 2.4% for the Barclays Aggregate and 1.9% dividend yield for S&P 500.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Investors should use active management to gain exposure to convertibles, the paper said.

“Generally speaking, passive unmanaged exposures to convertibles likely will not achieve this return profile as higher equity sensitive positions ideally should be exited in favor of less equity sensitive positions as equity markets rise, and in falling markets, less equity sensitive positions should be sold in favor of greater equity sensitivity names,” Rocaton said.

Such rebalancing, or total return, strategy could act as an equity substitute in a diversified portfolio, according to the report, capturing asymmetric return characteristics by catching the upside of the underlying stock while limiting the downside.

For investors looking to replace high yield or below investment grade fixed income, busted convertibles—with little equity sensitivity—could provide them with modest yield, the paper said, while maintaining their link to equity.

“Busted bonds are typically overlooked by total return investors and convertible arbitrageurs, who together control most of the convertibles market,” the consulting firm said. “As a result, they are subject to occasional periodic mispricing and dislocations, creating opportunities for active management.”

Investors should be aware of convertibles’ apparent risks, however, Rocaton argued. Its smaller and relatively illiquid market—approximately $350 billion in total market value globally—could cause periods of “higher than normal volatility due to liquidity shocks,” the paper said.

However, the report argued the pros of allocating to convertibles outweigh the cons. “Regardless of the investor type or the specific strategy, convertibles can play a role in most portfolios given their ability to participate in equity market rallies and limit downside outcomes,” it said.

Related content: How to Deal with Interest Rate Rises (Without Using Derivatives)

«