Is Credit Suisse the Next Lehman Brothers?

That question’s the buzz on social media, but the ailing bank seems to have wherewithal to keep going.


Talk is rife on Twitter and other social media that troubled Credit Suisse may become this decade’s Lehman Brothers—a large bank failure that would shake the world and usher in a vicious economic downturn. And you can’t just write off the social media chatter as idle panicky drivel.

The firm’s credit default swaps, in effect insurance against its defaulting on its debt, have jumped lately to their highest level. This implies an almost 25% chance that Credit Suisse will file for bankruptcy in the next five years. All three major credit ratings agencies—S&P, Moody’s and Fitch— now have a negative outlook on Credit Suisse, likely due to the swaps situation.

All this scary stuff has prompted the company, analysts and other financial figures to argue that Credit Suisse has the juice to stay in business. The mere fact that they have to mount these defenses argues that the bank has serious weaknesses. The bank didn’t return a request for comment.

The company has been unprofitable for the past three quarters. Over the past five years, Credit Suisse’s stock price has fallen by some 75%. It has had a revolving door of top executives.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

True, when Lehmann was suffering in 2008, weighed down by its exposure to subprime mortgages, there was a lot of hopeful palaver that things were not that bad—until the bank collapsed and touched off the global financial crisis. And right now, Europe at least seems hell-bent for a recession, owing to the Ukraine-Russia war and Moscow’s natural gas cutback.

But this time, odds are that the commentators have a valid point, that Zurich-based Credit Suisse has sufficient capital and liquidity to weather whatever storms roll in.

“I do not think this is a ‘Lehman moment,’” Mohamed El-Erian, an adviser to Allianz, told CNBC.

“We would be wary of drawing parallels with banks in 2008,” Citigroup analysts said in a client note.

Looking it Credit Suisse’s second quarter, “we see its capital and liquidity position as healthy,” JPMorgan Chase analyst Kian Abouhossein wrote.

It’s comforting that large banks worldwide, to include Credit Suisse, hold much more capital than they did in 2008. As of June, Credit Suisse has a leverage ratio—which measures capital as a portion of assets, mainly loans—of 6.1%, a much better score than other European banks such as Deutsche Bank and BNP Paribas.

Indeed, last year’s collapse of Archegos Capital Management has a lot of folks on Wall Street and bourses through the world on edge. The Archegos mess cost Credit Suisse $5.5 billion, showing how interconnected the financial community remains. Archego’s fall, of course, would be nothing like one involving Credit Suisse. Or for that matter, Lehman.

Related Stories:

Lessons from Lehman

During the Great Financial Crisis, Overly Optimistic Ratings Helped Kill the Market. Could It Be Happening Again?

Experts Debate Whether or Not a Recession in Europe Is Imminent at World Economic Forum

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Yale Endowment Gains 0.8%, Duke, Cornell Post Small Losses in 2022

Yale CIO sees ‘challenging times ahead’ due to rising interest rates, inflation, and geopolitics.



The investment portfolios for Yale University, Duke University, and Cornell University’s endowments managed to perform relatively well for fiscal year 2022, despite global markets being roiled by rampant inflation, rising interest rates, supply chain issues, and war.

Yale’s investment portfolio managed to eek out a 0.8% return, net of fees, for the year ending June 30, which translated to a $266 million investment gain. However, after spending $1.6 billion in distributions to the university’s operating budget, the endowment’s asset value decreased to $41.4 billion from $42.3 billion a year earlier. 

“In such a volatile year for the world’s financial markets, we are pleased to have protected Yale’s capital,” Matt Mendelsohn, Yale’s chief investment officer, said in a statement. “That said, we expect challenging times ahead as rising interest rates, inflation, and the geopolitical environment provide stiff headwinds.”

Over the 10 years ending June 30, Yale’s endowment returned 12.0% per year, which the university said outperformed the mean 10-year return for college and university endowments by an estimated 3.4% annually. It also said its portfolio returned 11.3% over the 20 years ending June 30 and surpassed the mean return for that time period for college and university endowments by an estimated 3.5% a year.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Meanwhile, Duke’s endowment reported an investment loss of 1.5% for the year ending June 30, compared with a 55.9% return last year, and a real rate of return target of at least 5.0% net of fees. The loss lowered the portfolio’s asset value to $12.1 billion from $12.7 billion at the end of fiscal year 2021.

Duke endowment’s benchmark is a composite comprised 70% of the MSCI All Country World Index, which represents the broad global equity market, and 30% of the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Index, which represents the domestic bond market. DUMAC, Inc., formerly Duke Management Company, said the MSCI All Country World Index and the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Bond Index lost 15.8% and 10.3%, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30.

And Cornell’s endowment reported an investment loss of 1.3% for the year ended June 30, which was well off last year’s 41.9% return, but easily beating its strategic benchmark’s 5.1% loss. The endowment’s asset value closed the fiscal year worth $9.8 billion, according to Cornell’s Office of University Investments.

“We ended the year with a very respectable return relative to the environment,” Cornell CIO Kenneth Miranda said in a statement. “We position the portfolio for the long term to weather positive and negative years. Fundamental to our investment philosophy is an understanding that over our near-infinite time horizon, the endowment will confront all manner of expected and unexpected market conditions.”

 

Related Stories

What Makes the Yale Model of Investing So Successful?

Penn, Cornell Lag Behind Other Ivy League Endowments

Yale Endowment Returns 6.8%, Duke’s Shrinks by $100 Million

Tags: , , , , , , ,

«