Inverted Yield Curve Puzzle: Higher Short-Term Yields

In this week’s recession scare, everyone focuses on the 10-year Treasury. But why are yields on T-bills for 12 months and below so high?

The inverted yield curve has given investors the heebie-jeebies lately, as it has long functioned as a harbinger of an oncoming recession. When an inversion happened on Friday, there was a lot of tut-tutting that this inversion wasn’t a real one—because the curve’s short end is the three-month Treasury yield (2.45%), and not the more traditional two-year T-bill.

Aside from the dubious provenance of the three-month bill, the investing world is paying attention to the continued fall of the benchmark yield at the other end of the curve, that of the 10-year note. Due to its status as a refuge amid worrisome conditions outside the US, overseas investors are crowding into the 10-year, boosting its price and lowering its yield.

But few are looking at the goings-on of the short, short part of the curve: the three-month Treasury, as well as the six-month and the 12-month obligations. Namely, their yields have blipped up and now are higher than the two-year (2.25%). Why, though?

“They’re not piling into” the Treasury paper maturing in 12 months or less, noted Marilyn Cohen, president of Envision Capital Management.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert daily newsletter.

Maybe the enticement of the 10-year is simply that the bond has a brand name that impels buying. And that’s even though you’re being paid slightly less in interest for the much greater risk that goes with holding an instrument for a decade, as opposed to a few months: The 10-year ended Tuesday yielding 2.41%, lamentably below the three-month’s 2.45%.

On the short, short end, however, maybe market preferences have less to do with how the shorter-maturity bills are yielding—because the Federal Reserve is driving things at that part of the yield spectrum. Right now, the three-month bill’s yield of 2.45% falls within the Fed’s target rate range of  2.25% to 2.50%.

Go back to March 2018, and that’s true of its yield then (1.79%) for the range at the time. And such also was the case with March 2017’s yield of 0.78%.

Should the Fed actually cut rates, as some predict, the yield curve would likely not bump skyward at the 12-month mark and less.

 

Related Stories:

Fed Chair Hints He May Ease Off Rate Boosts

Inverted Yield Curve Warning: Is It Different This Time?

Hey, Maybe the Fed Should Cut Interest Rates

Tags: , ,

«