Institutional Investors to Reduce Real Estate Investments in 2020

Pension funds, endowments, foundations plan to cut property commitments by 11%.

Institutional investors worldwide are planning on cutting back their investments in real estate by an average of 11% this year, according to a survey conducted by Institutional Real Estate and Kingsley Associates.

The report also found that 40% of institutional investors expect their capital flows to real estate to be lower than last year, and that US-based investors plan to commit $70 billion of new capital to real estate in 2020, down from $75 billion last year.

“Plans for 2020 new capital commitments to real estate are down for both domestic and foreign investors,” Jim Woidat, executive vice president with Kingsley Associates, said in a statement.

The survey focuses on the largest and most influential investors, and responses were collected between Nov. 12 and Feb. 4 from 196 institutional investors, including 129 US-based investors and 67 investors outside the US who represent $8.85 trillion in total assets under management (AUM) and $874 billion in real estate assets.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

The survey was conducted before the coronavirus pandemic hit the global economy and when the stock market had been performing well. However, the survey conductors said it still reflects a late-cycle investment mood and conveys what investors are considering regarding their long-term plans.

Respondents said they expected a real estate return of 8.4% in 2020, up from the 8.1% they had expected in 2019. In comparison, respondents said they projected returns from venture capital/private equity investments of 12% in 2020, up from expectations of 10.7% in 2019, and returns from fixed-income investments of 3.8%.

US investors’ satisfaction with real estate rose modestly in this year’s survey as the share of respondents saying they were “somewhat or very satisfied” increased to 78% in 2020 from 73% in 2019, while those saying they were “very satisfied” increased to 42% from 34%.

Still, investors outside the US said their satisfaction with the sector decreased over the past year as the number of respondents saying they were “very satisfied” fell sharply to 43% from 62%, while the number saying they were “somewhat satisfied” increased to 41% from 22%. But overall the respondents had positive sentiments regarding real estate as Woidat reported less than 10% of the investors said they feel negatively about real estate.

The report noted that over the past few years, investors have underestimated their actual real estate commitments, saying that respondents committed more capital in 2019 than they had initially planned. Actual commitments for US respondents who completed both the 2019 and 2020 surveys were $52.1 billion in 2019, which was 25% higher than the $41.4 billion they said they planned on investing.

Both US and non-US investors rated the US as the most attractive region for investing in real estate. Investors also held positive views about the real estate markets in Northern Europe, Australia, and Japan. By property type, industrial and multifamily were the most attractive sectors, while retail real estate ranked at the bottom among property types.

Related Stories:

Investors Put Out Welcome Mat for Hospitality Real Estate

CalPERS Commits More than $3 Billion to Real Estate

The Malls Get Mauled: Will Retail Real Estate Recover?

Tags: , , , , ,

Bill Miller: Why Now Is a Great Time to Buy Value Stocks

The famed investor, who just bought Boeing stock, says beaten-down gems are on sale.

The pandemic is one of the best stock-buying opportunities of all time. So says venerated value investor Bill Miller. And he oughta know.

Miller, when he headed Legg Mason Value Trust, beat the S&P 500 for 15 years in a row, a streak that ended in 2005. Today, however, out on his own, his flagship Miller Opportunity fund has had a mixed record.

The famous veteran investor, who retains a loyal following, opined in a letter to investors that he believes right now is one of the “great stock market buying opportunities” of his lifetime. Hey, the guy even bought shredded Boeing shares recently.

Miller said the fund was looking for good stocks that were cheap and overlooked in the market at present. Namely, “those names were also the worst performers when recession fears were high.” 

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Miller pinpointed four previous junctures when beaten-down stocks have been similarly alluring and proved to be wonderfully lucrative once things improved: In 1973-1974, as inflation was roaring and the Watergate scandal rocked Washington; in 1982 amid Mexico’s debt default; in 1987, in the aftermath of the October 1987 market crash; and in the 2008-09 global financial crisis.

“If you missed the other four great buying opportunities, the fifth one is now front and center,” Miller contended.

Following his 15-year streak, Miller’s showing has been erratic. He took a pasting during the 2008-09 financial crisis because he believed in maintaining his large position in financial stocks, which were tanking; he figured, wrongly, that their slide was temporary.

In his letter, he had no apologies for his chief fund’s up and down performance lately. This year, Miller Opportunity is down 35% and the S&P 500 is off 13.4%. But last year, he clocked a 33.9% gain, besting the benchmark index by 2.6 percentage points.

His top fund’s spotty record, he wrote, was owing to its holdings in volatile stocks. Going into 2020, he said he felt the risk environment was low, and then came the coronavirus scourge.

“We got that exogenous event in the form of a global pandemic that took stocks from all-time highs to a bear market decline of over 30% in the shortest time in history,” Miller said. “As is typical in these sorts of egregious declines, we are down a lot more than the market.”

In his defense, he pointed to John Maynard Keynes, the great economist who also was a celebrated investment manager. When money he was running went south during the 1937 stock rout and his board urged him to sell, Keynes responded, as quoted by Miller: It is “the duty of every serious investor to suffer grievous losses with great equanimity.”

Miller is no longer strictly a value guy. He and co-manager Samantha McLemore “will go wherever they feel negative investor sentiment along with positive fundamentals has created opportunity,” wrote Morningstar analyst Kevin McDevitt. “This can take them anywhere on the value-growth spectrum.” At the moment, research firm Morningstar gives the fund just a single star.

The star manager has taken significant helpings of dominant growth players such as Amazon, but also has gone big on the likes of Boeing (2.6% of his portfolio), which has had the hell kicked out of it. Due to the controversy over its crash-prone 737 MAX last year and its virus-slammed prospects this year, the aerospace giant has tumbled 60% in 12 months. He began amassing his Boeing position in March.

”I think, though, that a portfolio comprised of all ‘quality’ names, names that have been among the best performers in this dramatic decline,” Miller wrote, “will almost certainly be a portfolio that underperforms the market as the economy and the market recover.”

Related Stories:

Ill-Starred Investing Ace Bill Miller Posts Whiz-Bang 2019 Returns

What Bear Market? Why the More Solid Stocks May Be on the Upswing

Are Stocks a Bargain Buy Worth Taking?

Tags: , , , , , ,

«