Institutional Hires Abound in Alts and RE at Expense of Equities

Research by Eager, Davis & Holmes reveals that institutional hires in alternative investments and real estate increased in the first two quarters of 2011 at the expense of domestic active equity and fixed-income.

(August 2, 2011) — In the first two quarters of 2011, institutional hires in alternative investments and real estate increased at the expense of domestic equity and fixed-income, according to David Holmes, Partner at Eager, Davis & Holmes, a Louisville-based consultant to investment managers.

“We’ve known for a while now that institutional investments in equity were out of favor, while interest in alternatives — particularly private equity — have increased,” Holmes told aiCIO. With such a high level of volatility in equity, the drive among investors to reduce their risk has driven investors to pursue other asset classes. “Pension funds are seriously underfunded — they’re looking to increase returns. Equities have traditionally been a hedge against inflation — but they’re not the only answer now.”

The trend away from equities toward alternative investments has also been revealed by consulting firm Towers Watson. The firm’s Global Pension Asset Study — which collected responses from 271 asset managers — showed that North America continues to account for the largest amount of pension fund assets in alternatives, followed by Europe and Asia. The share of alternative investments in global pension fund portfolios ballooned to an average of 19% in 2010 from 7% in 2000.

Holmes added: “Investments that address special situations or are favored in an inflationary environment are seeing more hiring activity. Examples are oil and gas, commodities, timber, real assets, credit, and bank loans.” The research showed that alternative investments comprised 42% of placements in 2011’s first two quarters compared to a 37% average over the past six years.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

On the other side of the equation, Eager, Davis & Holmes’ research showed domestic active equity placements are down 42% in dollar terms for new mandates in the first two quarters of 2011 relative to 2010. “US active fixed income mandates are down slightly from 2010, but with strong hiring activity in some fixed income styles, including core plus, bank loans and credit-oriented mandates,” Holmes explained.

Additionally, according to Holmes, the current trend favors investment managers with a broad product array. “The high demand in specialty areas continues,” Holmes explained, “and underscores the importance of consultative selling to meet fund sponsors’ changing needs.” According to the research, PIMCO captured the most mandates over the past six quarters measured in terms of number of mandates. Blackrock, State Street Global, JPMorgan and Wellington round out the top five.

In particular, Holmes noted that PIMCO has been exceptional at broadening its product array over the past five years.

The research — indicative of what US retirement plans and endowments and foundations are doing with their investments — from Eager, Davis & Holmes’ Tracker Hiring Analytics database was compiled from publicly reported mandates outsourced by US institutional investors. The figures do not include insurance assets, since those mandates are not typically reported publicly. The firm tracks insurance asset outsourcing in a separate global database called Insurance Asset Tracker.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

Was Hedge Fund Falsely Accused of Malfeasance?

The three Louisiana pension funds that expressed concern over Fletcher Asset Management’s liquidity and financial reporting practices have sent a team to the hedge fund to investigate the matter; their findings suggest that the initial concerns may have been unsubstantiated.

(August 2, 2011) – A joint statement issued by the three Louisiana pension funds that were concerned with the liquidity and reporting practices of Fletcher Asset Management (FAM) revealed not only that Fletcher’s financial statements are up-to-standard but also that the return on the funds’ investments has been very strong.

A team that included executives from all three funds as well as a principal from the investigative and dispute services department at Ernst & Young visited Fletcher to conduct an investigation of the hedge fund’s practices.

Their findings, which were revealed in the statement, were largely inconsistent with the funds’ concerns. “The management and staff of FAM have been completely open and forthcoming with regard to all documents requested by the team,” the statement reads, “…FAM has presented documentation and financial statements indicating that the fund has assets exceeding the value of the systems’ investments and earnings showing more than $40 million in profit on the systems’ original investment.”

Earlier in July, aiCIO reported that the funds – the Firefighters’ Retirement System of Louisiana, the Municipal Employees’ Retirement System of Louisiana and the New Orleans Firefighters’ Pension and Relief Fund – expressed concern over their investments in Fletcher’s Income Arbitrage Fund (FIA), which totaled around $100 million.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

Specifically, two of the pension funds attempted to withdraw funds in March but their request was denied and they were instead issued promissory notes that would mature in two years. In a statement released by the pension funds when the concern was first raised, the funds said that the issuance of promissory notes in lieu of cash “gives rise to questions regarding the liquidity of the FIA fund and the accuracy of the financial statements issued by two renowned independent auditors.” The funds’ concerns also prompted an SEC inquiry into Fletcher’s practices, which is ongoing.

Although the most recent statement from the funds says that the Ernst & Young accountant will remain at Fletcher until his report is complete, indications are that the original concerns from the funds will be assuaged. The recent statement asserts that the financial statements are accurate, but it remains unclear why Fletcher issued the promissory notes instead of allowing the funds to withdraw their investments as cash. In spite of the 40% cumulative return on the pension funds’ investments, the notes may indicate that questions initially raised about Fletcher’s liquidity persist.

The investments that the funds made in FIA were intended to produce returns between 12% and 18%. If returns were lower than 12%, Fletcher would skim returns from other investors to reach the 12% threshold; if returns were greater than 18%, the pension funds would forfeit the excess return to Fletcher. Because FIA invests in other Fletcher vehicles, it is specifically designed to be especially appealing to investors: in the past 11 years, it has not experienced a single month of negative returns, and in 2008 FIA returned 12.6% despite overall losses of 42.8% for the Fletcher vehicles in which it invests.



<p>To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Justin Mundt at <a href='mailto:jmundt@assetinternational.com'>jmundt@assetinternational.com</a></p>

«