Insider: Flash Ban Likely, but Volcker “Unworkable”

The US Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could be close to passing legislation and rules that will, among other developments, eliminate flash trading and institute ‘circuit breakers’ for short-sellers, according to financial policy specialist Joseph Engelhard.

(February 24, 2010) — The US Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could be close to passing legislation and rules that will, among other developments, eliminate flash trading and institute ‘circuit breakers’ for short-sellers, according to financial policy specialist Joseph Engelhard.

Engelhard – senior vice president at Washington-based Capital Alpha Partners, a provider of policy research for institutional investors – said in a speech on Monday at the TradeTech USA conference in New York City that such changes look “increasingly likely” to pass muster in the Senate by the August recess and with the SEC.

“They will very likely eliminate flash trading, and ‘circuit breaker’ rules – possibly after 10% declines – will be put into effect,” the speaker said. Such circuit-breaker rules would require a so-called passive-bid test, where short selling in falling stocks would only be allowed above a national best bid. This rule is seen by many as a compromise between no action and a reversion to the uptick rule, which was abolished in 2007.

The SEC proposed a revised uptick rule and a circuit breaker in April 2009, and followed this up with an alternative uptick rule proposal the following August, which it suggested could be combined with a circuit-breaker. The commission proposed a ban on flash trading in September.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Changes to high-frequency and dark pool trading, however, are being looked at with a “slower approach,” Engelhard said. The comment period for the SEC’s dark pool transparency rule proposals, first unveiled in October last year, closed on Monday. The SEC proposed a ban on offering sponsored access without risk controls, generally used by high-frequency traders, in January this year.

Proposals that seem unlikely to pass the Senate include the Volcker rule – which would prevent banks that take retail deposits from running proprietary trading desks and investing in hedge funds and private equity funds, and would be “unworkable”, according to Engelhard – and the Tobin tax, levied on individual financial transactions, which Engelhard claimed is “one of the few bad ideas that has little chance of passing”.

Instead, Engelhard believes that a so-called TARP Tax, which would bring in an estimated $90 billion from the largest US financial service firms, will successful work its way through Congress and onto President Obama’s desk within months. “Obama sees the TARP tax as sufficient to address the needs” of the country, Engelhard said.

Hedge funds also will come under further scrutiny, according to Engelhard. “The Securities and Exchange Commission is all but certain to require registration and limited reporting from all but the smallest funds,” he said, adding that “most of this information will not become public. They will collect assets under management, leverage, counterparty exposure – but only aggregate information will likely be available publicly.”

As expected by many, derivatives will also be affected by pending legislation, the speaker claimed. “Major swap dealers and market participants will likely have to register with the SEC,” Engelhard said. “Over-the-counter derivatives will see mandatory clearing by a central counterparty, because the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) wants swaps put into clearing houses.”

TradeTech is a series of global conferences focusing on trade execution and technology.



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Kristopher McDaniel at <a href='mailto:kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com'>kmcdaniel@assetinternational.com</a>

AIG Class Action Approved for Ohio Plans; $150 Million SEC-BofA Settlement OK'ed

Ohio pension funds won class action certification over allegations of accounting fraud, among others; judge ends civil charges accusing BofA of misleading shareholders when it acquired Merrill Lynch.

(February 24, 2010) — In a lawsuit against American International Group (AIG), three Ohio retirement systems have been granted class-action certification.

 

According to the report, the systems allege they suffered billions of dollars in losses due to accounting fraud and other securities law violations committed by the insurance giant.

 

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

The three funds and lead plaintiffs — the $69 billion Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, $62.9 billion Ohio State Teachers Retirement System and $10 billion Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund – initially filed the suit against AIG on October 15, 2004. The lawsuit is seeking damages for investors who bought AIG securities between October 28, 1999, and April 1, 2005.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Deborah Batts of the southern District of New York granted the class-action status against AIG for equity shareholders but excluded bondholders.

 

According to the AP, Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, former AIG chief executive officer and board chairman, agreed in August to pay $115 million to settle fraud claims as part of the lawsuit.

 

“Although we continue to believe that no class should be certified, we are pleased that the court refused to certify any bondholder claims and significantly limited the equity holder claims,” said AIG officials in a statement. “AIG already has paid $800 million to an SEC fair fund to compensate its investors, including those that are part of the alleged class in this lawsuit — more than what all the other defendants have agreed to pay combined.”

 

In other news, a US judge has approved a $150 million settlement between Bank of America and the Securities and Exchange Commission over changes that the bank neglected to disclose material information about its acquisition of Merrill Lynch. BofA currently faces a class action lawsuit from Richard Cordray, Ohio attorney general, who filed a complaint on behalf of five pension funds against the bank.

 

“We welcome Judge Rakoff’s ruling today, which recognizes that Bank of America failed to adequately disclose to its shareholders material information related to the Bank’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch,” said Ohio’s Cordray to Global Pensions. Today’s decision validates and reinforces the core allegations of our lawsuit against Bank of America.”



To contact the <em>aiCIO</em> editor of this story: Paula Vasan at <a href='mailto:pvasan@assetinternational.com'>pvasan@assetinternational.com</a>; 646-308-2742

«