Infrastructure Prices Hit Record High | Chief Investment Officer

The cost of buying infrastructure assets has grown to record levels and fewer deals are taking place, research has shown.

More than one-third of global transactions completed so far in 2014 have been worth more than $500 million, according to data monitor Preqin. This has helped bring the average infrastructure deal size to $523 million for the year.

“These increases in valuations have led to concerns that some infrastructure sectors are becoming overpriced,” said Andrew Moylan, Preqin. This number is almost 12% higher than the previous record of $468 million, the average deal size in 2012, and 22.5% higher than the average transaction last year.

“The growth in demand for infrastructure, along with the much-improved availability of debt, has resulted in greater competition for assets, and for established brownfield assets in particular,” said Andrew Moylan, head of real assets products at Preqin.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

This competition, along with the falling number of deals, has pushed prices higher. Between 2011 and the end of 2013, the number of deals completed annually fell by 5%. If the current half year number of deals—367—only doubles, the sector will see an 11% drop in transactions in 2014.

This could lead to more price inflation as fund managers hold a record $100 billion in uncalled capital, Preqin estimated, and many institutional investors are planning to grow their allocations to infrastructure.

“These increases in valuations have led to concerns that some infrastructure sectors are becoming overpriced, and those firms looking to put capital to work will have to work very hard to find value in the current market,” Moylan concluded.

Allocators to hedge funds should avoid selecting managers purely on recent performance and instead focus on alpha generation, according to research by Commonfund.

The group’s Head of Hedge Fund Research Kristofer Kwait and Director John Delano detailed research into different methods of manager selection in a new white paper titled “Chasing winners: The appeal and the risk”.

The pair wrote: “Managers that may have been cast among a losers heap for failing to ‘see the ball’—that is, for pursuing strategies with beta properties that are out of favour—might very well demonstrate a sort of mean-reversion effect, on average, and subsequently outperform.”

Kwait and Delano constructed a hypothetical portfolio from a universe of 3,300 equity, event-driven, macro, and relative value hedge funds. Every month the pair brought in two new managers with the best track record in absolute performance over the previous 18 months, and sold them once they had been in the portfolio for 18 months.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

Over the course of 14 years, to the end of 2013, the portfolio significantly outperformed the average for their hedge fund universe, implying that churning managers could prove a lucrative strategy (although the effect of fees and trading costs was not investigated).

However, Kwait and Delano went on to show that performance dropped significantly if the evaluation and holding periods were extended to three, four, or five years—periods of assessment far closer to that used in institutional investment.

They wrote that “while there is evidence of positive performance persistence in hedge funds”, these windows of performance were too short to be a “realistic investment strategy for the large majority of allocators, most of which would prefer not (or are structurally unable) to manage a hedge fund allocation with continual short-term turnover”.

However, when Kwait and Delano turned this strategy to focus on alpha generation rather than pure returns over three and four year periods, they discovered “evidence of a statistical benefit of pursuing managers that have produced alpha”.

The pair concluded: “It may benefit hedge fund investors who base hire and fire decisions on whether managers have captured a significant portion of the equity market’s upside to be particularly diligent about identifying beta-driven returns as an equity bull market turns several years old.”