Indiana Hunts for Outsourced Annuity Provider, Despite Bill to Block It

(January 29, 2014) – The Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) has ignored ongoing protests from state legislators and pushed ahead with its plan to outsource the optional annuities it offers retirees.

The $27 billion fund has reissued a request for proposals (RFP) for insurance companies interested in the contract, which is worth roughly $200 million per year, according to the document.

INPRS received submissions from the initial RFP, which was issued in March, the retirement system’s head of communications Jeffrey Hutson to aiCIO. However, subsequent changes to the fund’s actuarial assumptions meant new and more specific parameters for annuity providers’ proposals. The new RFP was released January 21.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Under the board’s plan, INPRS would continue to provide and administrate members’ core defined benefit (DB) pension. But in addition to the DB scheme, IPRS members pay about 3% of their salaries into an annuity savings account. Upon retirement, roughly half choose to take the balance as a lump sum while the rest use it to purchase an in-house annuity.

In a July 2012 meeting, the board of trustees decided to outsource those annuities.

“The board’s major reason for taking this outside the fund is managing risk,” Hutson said. “As fiduciaries, they asked themselves if using a solid external provider didn’t make more sense. The board decided to reduce risk where they could.”

State lawmakers disagreed.

A bipartisan group of four house representatives have sponsored a bill to bar INPRS’ board from hiring an external annuity provider for the next five years. Instead of outsourcing, it proposed INPRS price annuities using the pension fund’s actual returns instead of its 6.75% assumed rate of return. This would make annuities affordable for the fund, the lawmakers argued, while saving retirees the additional haircut of private fees.

The legislation—declared an “emergency” measure—was introduced January 9, and cleared the house employment, labor, and pensions committee with unanimous support on January 27.

“With privatized control, retirees will lose peace of mind that they can reach out and touch someone in the public employees retirement system who will securely handle payments on their annuities,” said Representative David Niezgodski, a Democrat and cosponsor of the bill. What the board members called “managing risk,” Niezgodski and a number of other politicians have characterized as “dump[ing] their responsibilities.”

“We do understand that there are some concerns people have, which are legitimate for them to raise,” INPRS’ Hutson said. “One is the stability that INPRS provides, and losing that by shifting to someone outside. People trust INPRS. But we are committed to selecting a very solid provider, and we don’t wash our hands of monthly, weekly, and daily oversight.”

He also noted that INPRS would comply with any legislation passed into law, but is going forward with the plan set by the board.

The bill to ban outsourcing of public annuities has moved on to the House Ways and Means Committee, which has yet to schedule a hearing.

Prospective annuity providers have until February 27 to respond to the retirement system’s RFP.

(January 28, 2014) — US university endowments performed well in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, recording an average net return of 11.7% and bouncing back from a 0.3% decline last year, NACUBO and Commonfund have reported.

Still, endowments lagged behind US public pension funds, which posted a median gain of 12.4% for the same period, according to Wilshire Associates data released last August.

The endowment study, published January 28, included 835 institutions representing $448.6 billion.

It found that domestic equities produced the highest average return of any asset class in endowments’ portfolios at 20.6%. International equities followed at 14.6% and alternatives generated an average return of 8.3% for education endowments. Fixed income and short-term securities/cash lagged behind, with gains of 1.7% and 1.2% respectively.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

“The strong overall performance by endowments is encouraging at a time when the global economy continues its relatively slow recovery from the economic crisis of five years ago,” said Commonfund Institute Executive Director John Griswold. “This year’s investment results reflect in large measure the strength in publicly traded equities that has prevailed since early 2009.”

According to the report, the endowments averaged a net five-year return of 4% and net 10-year return of 7.1%. Institutions with larger endowments outperformed smaller funds. Over the last 10 years, those in 75th percentile by assets gained 7.8% annually, compared to the 25th percentile’s 6.3%.

“While larger endowments have performed better over the long-term 10-year period, smaller endowments with higher allocations to domestic equities have done well in the shorter term—a result that has enabled them to continue to support their educational missions,” Griswold said.

Of various alternative vehicles, distressed debt generated the highest average return at 14.8%, followed by marketable alternatives at 10.5%. Private equity returned 9.1%, the study found.

“This relative pause in the decade-long growth of alternative strategy allocations will bear watching in future years,” he said.

Asset allocations remained steady in fiscal year 2013, with little change from 2012. Participating endowments allocated 16% to domestic equities, 10% to fixed income, 18% to international equities, 53% to alternatives, and 3% to short-term securities and cash.

While NACUBO and Commonfund’s preliminary data reported a seven percentage point drop in allocations to alternatives during the 2013 fiscal year—from 54% to 47% of portfolios. The final report, however, only indicated a 1% fall. Significant increases in private equity allocations by several large institutions accounted for the difference, according to Griswold.

Harvard University was ranked at the top of the list again this year for total assets under management, adding $2 billion to its $30 billion endowment. Yale University was the second richest school, according to the report, with $20 billion in assets in 2013, up from $19.3 billion last year.

However, expanded portfolios and good investment performance was not enough to put universities at ease, according to the report.

“Despite the improvements in investment returns over the past year, colleges and universities are in a period of rethinking their budget-setting strategies and priorities,” John Walda, NACUBO president and CEO, said. “We have gone through a great period of volatility in the financial markets over the past 10 years, along with deep cutbacks in government funding for higher education and declines in enrollment and tuition revenue at some schools.”

Average total debt increased in fiscal year 2013 to $204.3 million from $187.5 million last year, while average spending rate gained 0.2% from last year, reaching 4.4%.