Immigration Critics Overlook the Good It Does, per State Street

The worker influx has led to moderate wage growth and thus held down inflation, according to the firm’s Arone.

Art by Melinda Beck


Immigration is a hot topic during this political season. Former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, has criticized his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, for a surge of migrants over the U.S.-Mexico border, numbers which dipped this year after the administration of President Joe Biden tightened access. Both candidates vow to restrict future inflows.

Still, critics of border crossings overlook the economic good that an influx of immigrants has created, according to Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors for its U.S. SPDR business. “Immigration is a political football,” he noted in a commentary. “Regrettably, many people underappreciate the role that increasing immigration has played in stabilizing the post-pandemic labor market without” fueling inflationary pressures.

Limits on migration during the Trump Administration—it dipped to 750,000 annually over Trump’s four-year span, , down from around 1 million historically—“combined with the post-pandemic challenges contributed to extreme supply/demand imbalances in the labor market in 2021,” he wrote.

But migration traffic increased to 2.5 million in 2023 and is on pace to reach the same level this year, Arone added. “The rise in immigration over the past couple of years has helped the labor market achieve greater equilibrium without stoking wage inflation,” Arone wrote.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

He pointed to a survey by Empirical Research Partners showing that for low-skill service positions, where wage growth peaked at 8.5% in 2022, it currently is 4.2%. The labor market is “moderately tight,” he stated.

This moderation of wage growth has helped slow the pace of inflation, Arone observed. The Consumer Price Index’s increase decelerated to 2.9% in July from a recent peak of 9.1% in June 2022 (the August CPI reading will be released on Wednesday). The Federal Reserve is expected to decrease its policy short-term rate, now effectively 5.33%, when it meets September 17 and 18.

To Arone, a lot of the talk about immigration has been “senseless fear-mongering.” In his view, the “positive economic impacts from increased immigration start from gainful employment but rapidly extend to greater entrepreneurship, innovation, consumption and fiscal contributions.”

Related Stories:

How Does the Market Perform Under Democratic or GOP Rule?

Maybe Baby Boomers Won’t Tank the Stock Market by Cashing Out

Lower Inflation Should Herald Higher Stock Prices Ahead, Strategists Say

Tags: , , , , ,

Final Settlement Hearing Set for December in Class Action vs. Uber

The Boston Retirement System is a class representative of investors seeking a $200 million settlement from the ride-share giant for false statements connected with its 2019 IPO.



The Boston Retirement System and other investors are one step closer to reaching a settlement with Uber in a class action lawsuit seeking damages from investment losses related to the company’s 2019 initial public offering.
 

A hearing for final approval of the settlement is scheduled for December 5 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to determine if the proposed settlement is fair and review a plan of allocation for the distribution of settlement funds among class members and for counsel’s fees. 

The Boston Retirement System, with $5.4 billion in assets and 34,000 in active and retired members and beneficiaries, is one of the court-appointed class representatives in the case, Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies Inc. Defendants in the case include the company, executives, board members and a group of banks that underwrote the IPO. 

The Boston Retirement System and the law firm representing the pension fund, Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP, as the result of a mediation process, in April proposed a $200 million settlement for investors who purchased Uber stock during the period between May 10, 2019, and November 5, 2019, shortly after the company’s IPO.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

In 2020, the BRS filed a complaint against Uber, alleging that documents connected with the company’s IPO contained false and misleading statements and/or omissions.  

Uber’s IPO priced on May 10, 2019, at $45 per share, reaching an $82.4 billion valuation, less than the projected $120 billion some investors had anticipated. Shares closed the day at $41, a drop of more than 7%. 

Since its IPO, Uber’s shares have increased roughly 67%, as of September 6. 

“We believe strongly that our IPO materials were both complete and accurate and are pleased to put this matter behind us,” a spokesperson for Uber said.

Related Stories: 

Boston Pension Fund Files Class Action Lawsuits Against Six Flags, HP 

Michigan Pension Fund Files Complaint Against ZoomInfo 

Ryanair Settles Lawsuit With Alabama Pension Fund 

Tags: , , , ,

«

Close