Human Capital: A New Investment Thesis That Is Delivering So Far

By measuring employee morale and other people-centered influences on share prices, fledgling ETFs have beaten benchmarks—and attracted a large SWIB position.


Human capital is not part of any balance sheet. A potpourri of employees’ skills, intelligence, motivation, morale and other such intangibles, this is a new theme in investing. Still, the basic concept has an obvious impact on how stocks perform, although not many people recognize that.

Judging by positive early returns from three newly hatched exchange-traded funds with a strategy based on human capital, the people-centric approach seems to have investment utility. The trio of ETFs, sponsored by Harbor Capital, uses a methodology that just marked its third anniversary.

Created by research firm Irrational Capital, in conjunction with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, this methodology attempts to quantify how the people element influences stock appreciation. While Irrational and CIBC keep the formula under a proprietary veil, they say it incorporates employee surveys from numerous providers.

“Human capital delivers alpha,” the excess equities return over market indexes, says David van Adelsberg, founder of Irrational Capital. As such, he argues, human capital should be included alongside other, better-known, investment factors, such as quality, momentum and risk.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The old saying about a workplace is: A happy shop is a successful shop. An analysis by research firm VettiFi described how this adage is self-evident, yet seldom appreciated. The firm’s head of research, Todd Rosenbluth, wrote: “Human capital is overlooked by many investors, but is important. Happy, motivated employees are more productive, and this should impact share prices.”

Indeed, a 2021 J.P. Morgan Securities back test of 400 U.S. stocks, using Irrational Capital’s methodology—done before the ETFs appeared—found that the human capital factor produced “the highest returns among all style groups since 2010” by 5.4% on average over the period.

An unrelated iShares ETF has been tracking human capital in Japanese companies since 2016. The iShares JPX/S&P CAPEX & Human Capital ETF, which is designed to include Japanese companies taking proactive and efficient measures with their investments in capital spending and human capital, has reported one-, three- and five-year returns of 19.04%, 16.97% and 11.17%

Although the Harbor ETFs have yet to gain prominence (the threesome’s combined assets under management total only $412 million), one big-league backer is the State of Wisconsin Investment Board. The organization has invested in two of the Harbor vehicles, with a $362 million stake constituting  90% of the two ETFs’ market cap, as of SWIB’s most recent 13-F filing. SWIB declined to comment on its holdings.

Thus far, the three Harbor human capital ETFs have done very well during their short existence. (True, a track record of less than two years is usually too little an amount of time to make a definitive pronouncement on their staying power.) The three funds construct portfolios with well-known indexes’ constituents and use the indexes as benchmarks.

The oldest one is the smallest ($12 million AUM), the Harbor Human Capital Factor Unconstrained, whose benchmark is the large-cap Russell 1000. Opening in February 2022, it thus far this year is up 32%, as of Thursday’s close, beating the Russell index by nine percentage points. This is the one Harbor human capital ETF that SWIB does not own.

The second ETF to launch, in October 2022, is the Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap, with stocks drawn from the S&P 500. This fund (AUM: $277 million) is ahead with 28.3%, versus 22.9% for the S&P index.

The third fund, which debuted in April 2023, is dedicated to small-cap stocks and is measured against the Russell 2000: The Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap (AUM: $123 million) has climbed 14.6% in its eight-month tenure. The Russell 2000 gained slightly less, 12.3%, during that period.

To Irrational Capital’s van Adelsberg, using human capital as a lens to view investments is an undeniable improvement for investors seeking alpha—which he likens to the innovation of putting wheels on suitcases. “It’s a simple idea,” he says.

Related Stories:

Schroders Takes Aim at Measuring Human Capital’s Impact on Stock Returns

Investors Press US SEC for Enhanced Human Capital Disclosures

Opinion: What Do Marriages and M&As have in Common?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Super Funds Seek to Turn Australia Into ‘Renewable Energy Superpower’

A group representing A$1.2 trillion in assets is calling for reforms and investment on ‘a massive scale.’



A group of Australian superannuation funds managing A$1.2 trillion ($790 billion) is urging the Australian government to make policy changes to help enable investment toward transitioning to a low-carbon, net-zero economy and to “make Australia a renewable energy superpower.”

The group, which includes AustralianSuper, ART, CareSuper, Cbus, HESTA, Hostplus, Rest Super, UniSuper and investment firm IFM Investors, have released a policy blueprint that identifies investment opportunities among a range of sectors, as well as barriers that lie ahead during the transition.

According to the funds, there should be a sense of urgency for policy changes, as the country’s energy transition will require investment on “a massive scale.” The report projects that it will take an investment of approximately A$12 billion per year on average between now and 2050 in the electricity sector alone, and more than A$40 billion per year to decarbonize other sectors of the economy and grow energy-intensive export industries.

Overall, the need fits well with superannuation funds’ needs as investors, the report argues.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

“Much of this investment will be capital-intensive with long time horizons – a good match for Australian superannuation funds which are able to offer long-term financing,” it states.

The policy recommendations include fast-tracking planning, expanding investment opportunities in transmission and creating a financial bridge intended to provide risk-adjusted returns for pension fund participants, while limiting the costs and the impact on local communities.

“If Australia doesn’t get this right, the costs now and into the future will be significant,” the report warned. “For households and businesses, a slower and disorderly energy transition will mean higher costs. This will be felt not only through increased impacts of climate change on people’s lives and livelihoods but also through higher energy bills and a more unreliable energy supply.”

Additional recommendations include rolling out transmission lines to renewable energy zones, accelerating investments in batteries and developing a local sustainable aviation fuel industry.

“Transmission is the foundation for Australia to fulfill its potential as a green energy superpower and a key enabler of other areas of energy transition,” the report stated. It also noted that the country needs 10,000 km (more than 6,200 miles) of transmission lines built by 2050.

According to the report, accelerating investment in battery storage will be key to the transition, but the country will also need to increase current power capacity by more than 30 times by 2050. It said the National Electricity Market covering eastern and southern Australia currently has about 2 gigawatts of storage capacity but will need to boost that to 15 gigawatts by 2030 and 61 gigawatts by 2050.

“Batteries are the key piece of the clean energy puzzle—providing secure, reliable energy for households, industry and the community as we transition to more intermittent renewable sources of energy,” the report stated.

The report also pointed out several barriers currently faced by long-term investors when investing in battery storage. For example, all battery projects involve relatively large upfront capital expenditure that needs to be recouped over the life of the project. Due to current regulations and market dynamics, battery project revenues are dependent on volatile intraday electricity pricing, such as selling energy when demand is high and maximizing profit from price differentials.

The report also noted Australia’s heavy reliance on air travel, which could be aided by an Australian biofuels industry that included sustainable aviation fuel. According to the report, that scenario could inject up to A$10 billion annually to the country’s gross domestic product and create approximately 26,000 jobs by the 2030s.

“Without a domestic production capability, SAF will be produced overseas, using Australian feedstock, and shipped back to Australia,” the report stated. “This could diminish the carbon reduction benefit of using SAF and could mean Australia misses out on the jobs and economic benefit of a new value-add industry.”

 

Related Stories:

Australia Agrees to Disclose Sovereign Bonds’ Climate Risks

Australian Super Funds Advocate for Board Gender Diversity

Australian Prime Minister Proposes $10 Billion Green Fund

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«