How Pension Deficits Could Boost Your Portfolio

Poor pension funding could lead to equity-buying opportunities, according to one leading asset manager.

(September 23, 2013) — A publically listed company with a huge pension deficit should be avoided by investors at all costs, right? Not always, analysts at Goldman Sachs Asset Management have said.

The bank-backed asset management firm tracks a basket of Europe-listed companies with the largest pension deficits and reported that—in July at least—they had been outperforming their peers with relatively healthy funding levels.

The performance of these 50 companies in the STOXX Europe 600 has closely followed the rise in German bond yields, which had been rising steadily since May. GSAM said it expected these companies to continue to rise on this basis, should the German 10-year bund take the same line.

The theory is that as bond yields begin to rise, and with the eventual loosening of quantitative easing around the world this is likely to occur, liabilities will be reeled in. This should mean deficits are also lessened and corporates should see smaller pension black holes on their balance sheets.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

GSAM said the impact of these deficits on the companies—or rather their duty to pour in cash should they get any worse—had already been adjusted in the pricing of these stocks, meaning they were cheaper than their peers in the same business. This affect had lessened in the recent past, GSAM said, but the analysts stuck to the basic premise, using the 12 month price-to-earnings forecast to show these companies were still set to trade at a discount.

The asset manager advised investors that many of the stocks in the basket were classed as “cyclical” and they were dominated by UK companies, due to the nature of the country’s benefit system.

Use ticker GSSTPENS to track the basket on Bloomberg.

Related content: Pressure – the causes of corporate pensions’ altered reality—and future.

Russian Pensions to Lose Billions through Government Rules

The Russian Finance Ministry has proposed a radical change to non-state pension funds in a bid to boost transparency.

(September 23, 2013) — The creation of a new registration system for non-state pension funds in Russia will result in the funds losing RUB500 billion ($16 billion) in the next two years, according to news reports.

The Finance Ministry in Russia has proposed barring non-state funds from collecting and investing new contributions until they re-register as open joint-stock companies and are accepted into a new insurance programme, designed to boost transparency and accountability.

The registration process can take up to two years, during which time any new money due to enter those non-state pension funds will be transferred to the country’s state development bank, the VEB.

Money already managed by pension funds will stay with them through the reform period, and as soon as any of the more than 90 existing non-state pension funds re-registers and is accepted into the insurance programme, it will receive funds back from VEB.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Finance Minister Anton Siluanov told Bloomberg the two-year registration process was necessary because it was “important to bring order to the regulation of the non-state pension funds system, to make sure only dependable and conscientious participants get access to the market”.

“It’s also important to set a strict prudential supervision on the financial market so that pension savings are protected,” he added.

Currently, one-third of Russia’s total RUB2.6 trillion of funded retirement money is invested in stocks and bonds by non-state pension funds.

But the VEB, which invests on behalf of people who haven’t selected a manager, focuses on government, mortgage, and guaranteed infrastructure-related debt, earning a yield of 9.2% last year.

Domestic inflation ran at 6.6%, meaning the VEB yield rate is relatively low. Russian investment experts told Bloomberg the measure would damage non-state pension funds not only through the lower returns on their new contributions, but also because corporate bond yields will be lowered by the move.

“The measure will lower the demand for domestic corporate bonds,” Dmitry Dudkin, head of fixed income research at UralSib Capital, said. “This will further widen the chasm between the state-related instruments and risks of private companies.”

The ministry is predicted to submit its proposals on non-state pension funds to the State Duma, the lower house of parliament, by the end of September.

Related Content: Senators Urge CalPERS, CalSTRS to Boycott Russia and GSAM’s O’Neill: Russia Shouldn’t Let a Crisis Go to Waste  

«