How Come ETF Inflows Are Up, but Stocks and Bonds Are Down?

Stocks and bonds have had a rough 2022. The S&P 500 is down 18.2% this year. Its bond equivalent, the Nonetheless, exchange-traded funds have been gaining investment dollars.

Equity ETFs got $187 billion in inflows in 2022 through last Thursday, and bond funds bagged $64 billion, according to Strategas, the market strategy arm of financial services firm Baird. Over the past five years through last Thursday, inflows to stock ETFs (which overwhelmingly dominate exchange-traded funds) for 2022 are the second strongest, beaten only by 2021’s same-period showing.

The current year’s inflows are not keeping up with “the blistering pace of 2021, but still [it’s] a strong year for overall equity flows,” says Todd Sohn, ETF strategist at Strategas.

Want the latest institutional investment industry news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters. 

Given the rocky markets of 2021, how did this happen? One possible explanation Sohn raises: Investors are buying ETFs on the dips, especially bond ones. If so, that suggests that ETF investors—who are mostly longer-term-oriented than the hot-money crowd in individual names—want to get in on bargains, with the expectation that investments will recover in the future. History shows that has been a pretty safe bet.

On the equity side, there has been a big shift into defensive sectors. For a snapshot of the equities landscape, look at iShares Momentum ETF’s sector weighting in May. Strategas data shows that health care gained the most in market weight, leading others with a 28.8% share (double its April position). Consumer staples were up fourfold, to 16.7%. Utilities were at 4.6% from near-zero.

Meanwhile, money has flowed out of tech and financial ETFs. For tech, the high valuations of recent times likely were unsupportable, and rising interest rates harm their future expected returns. Financials have a mixed picture: Higher interest rates will help banks, but mergers and initial public offerings are flagging, which isn’t good for Wall Street. “There’s credit risk, too,” notes Sohn, with a weakening economy leading to more defaults and bankruptcies.

Puzzlingly, energy is a top performer, and yet not a magnet for ETF investors. Sohn attributes that to the green-mindedness of some investors. Plus, investors remember the past decade, when energy companies were doing poorly amid low oil prices. In 2016, oil was below $30 per barrel, about one-fourth of today’s level.

Another seeming head-scratcher: Despite the horrendous plummet in tech stocks, growth ETFs garnered $5.6 billion in inflows last month. Sohn thinks investors are “bottom fishing,” looking for good bargains in an industry that surely will return.

On the bond side, the laurels go to Treasury ETFs, which pulled in almost $18 billion in fresh money in May, which Strategas dubs a record. Sohn says the appeal owes to “anxious equities,” meaning the money is coming from stock investors spooked by recurrent stock slides.

Corporate and municipal bonds are also doing well enticing new money. Probable reason: Investment-grade corporates and local governments have a lot of cash to buffer them from any economic falls.

What Big Inflows into an ETF Tell Us About Bonds

Cathie Wood Lashes Out at ETF Dedicated to Shorting Her

Tags: Bonds, energy, ETFs, financial, growth, Health Care, inflows, Stocks, Strategas, Todd Sohn, Treasury ETFs

Former New York City mayor and current congressional candidate Bill de Blasio is calling for the state’s two largest pension funds to divest from companies that manufacture firearms and ammunition.

In an op-ed in AM New York, De Blasio said the $279.7 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, which manages the pension for the state’s government employees, and the $148.1 billion New York State Teachers’ Retirement System are significant investors in Olin Corporation, which is one of the largest ammunition manufacturers in the U.S.

He also said the funds hold significant positions in other large gun manufacturers, including Storm Ruger and Co., Vista Outdoor, National Presto Industries and American Outdoor Brands. The funds should “hold the gun industry accountable,” he said, by removing the stocks from their portfolios.

“These are public companies that manufacture the deadly weapons and the ammunition used to kill our children,” de Blasio wrote. “While these investments may pass a fiduciary screen, they do not pass a moral one. This is unacceptable.”

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

Divestment of guns and ammunition by funds of their size “would send a clear and meaningful message,” he said, “and be the beginning of an effort to bring scrutiny to these companies,” similar to divestment campaigns targeting fossil fuel and tobacco companies.

“Right now, the NYSCRF and the NYSTRS have the opportunity to truly make a difference in the lives of those affected by gun violence,” de Blasio said. “Divestment sends a powerful message to gun manufacturers, and the pensioners, that these funds stand vehemently opposed to the companies directly benefiting from the flow of guns and bullets into our communities … these pension funds must adopt a strict new investment criterion to no longer hold gun and ammunition manufacturers in their funds.”

A spokesman for DiNapoli said the NYSCRF has been monitoring its investments in gun and ammunition makers, and that it has already divested some of its holdings.

“State Comptroller DiNapoli directed the state pension fund to divest from gun manufacturers nearly a decade ago,” a spokesperson for the New York state comptroller’s office said in a statement, according to the New York Post. “The impact of gun violence on our communities is heartbreaking, but also poses a substantial risk to investors, which is why we divested years ago following the tragedy at Sandy Hook.”