House Republicans, Senate Democrats Agree on PBGC Administrative Funding

The Appropriations Committees for the House of Representatives and the Senate have advanced very different spending bills related to the Department of Labor.

The Senate version, which passed its committee 25-1 on Thursday, would provide $13.5 billion in discretionary funding to the DOL for fiscal year 2024. $249 million of the total is for the Employee Benefits Security Administration, an increase from the $191 million appropriated in 2023.

The House version appropriates $9.8 billion for the DOL, of which $153 million is for EBSA. The House version passed committee on July 14.

After this week, Congress is not scheduled to return to session until September 12. The bills must be harmonized by September 30, along with the rest of the federal budget, to avoid a shutdown, absent a continuing resolution.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news. 

The two bills do agree on funding for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. Both bills appropriate $513 million for the PBGC and provide for an additional $9.2 million in administrative funding for every 20,000 participants in excess of 100,000 in terminated plans. In both bills, this funding is provided through September 30, 2028.

The Senate anticipates that obligations related to the Special Financial Assistance program will cost the PBGC nearly $14 billion, but this funding is tied to the American Rescue Plan Act.

The Senate’s bill also requires “EBSA to create and widely disseminate educational materials focused on promoting best practices in employee ownership through the Employee Ownership Initiative authorized by Section 346 of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022.” This provision is absent in the House’s bill.

Section 346 of SECURE 2.0 requires the DOL to establish an Employee Ownership Initiative and authorized $50 million to promote employee ownership.

The Senate Appropriations Committee previously approved $14 million for the creation of a retirement plan database, or “lost and found,” to be administered by the DOL. The House Appropriations Committee has yet to provide for this.

The House version also blocks the EBSA rule which permits environmental, social and governance considerations to be used in fiduciary decisions related to retirement plans and proxy voting. The Senate bill does not address that rule.

The ESG rule is currently being challenged by two lawsuits. The rule allows ESG funds to be used as a qualified default investment alternative and makes it easier for ESG funds to be placed in investment menus, but it does not change a fiduciary’s obligation to be loyal and prudent. The lawsuits assert that this rule violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, among other claims.

Tags: EBSA, ESG, PBGC

Eight outsourced CIO providers dominate that field, which had been expanding nicely—until it encountered 2022’s harsh stock and bond market rout. Suddenly, this octet of big-time asset managers, who control slightly more than half the sector in terms of assets under management, saw their AUMs shrink, according to search consultant Charles Skorina & Co., which tracks the OCIO world.

The S&P 500’s vertiginous fall last year “was the main reason” for the unprecedented contraction,” Skorina says. The only one of the eight to eke out an AUM increase was BlackRock, whose outsourced CIO AUM grew by 2%. That growth was due to the addition of two huge accounts, $14 billion in assets from General Dynamics’ retirement plan and $36 billion from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters’ Central States Pension Funds.

The rest of the eight suffered a bloodbath, with WTW the least harmed (losing 12.7%) and Aon the most injured (down 32.6%). The largest provider, Mercer, owned by Marsh McLennan, dropped 16.9%. (BlackRock is ranked second.)

For years, there has been an ongoing trend for corporate plan sponsors to farm out management of their programs, or at least part of them, to outside vendors. The big players have raked in an outsized portion of the OCIO work, owing to their financial heft and brand recognition.

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter. 

Last year’s comedown was stunning for OCIOs, which have historically gained assets over time. In 2021, a good year for investors, assets for the top eight providers grew by an average of 10.2%. But in 2022, the average cascaded to negative 15.2%.

Expansion had been a seeming constant for OCIOs. A recent Vanguard Group study, covering 2015 through 2021, found that total OCIO AUM nearly doubled, to more than $2.5 trillion in AUM from $1.3 trillion, during that period.

So despite a down year, the OCIO business likely is not in some existential crisis and should resume growth: In CIO’s 2023 Outsourced Chief Investment Officer Survey, released in June, 7% of respondents said they plan to adopt the OCIO approach over the following 24 months.