Harvard Activists Call for Fossil Fuel Divestment

Students, faculty, and alumni mark Earth Day by kicking off ‘Heat Week.’

Harvard University students, faculty, and alumni marked Earth Day by kicking of a week of climate-related rallies and calling on the university’s $39.2 billion endowment to eliminate fossil fuel-related companies from its investment portfolio.

Divest Harvard, a fossil fuel divestment advocacy group began this year’s “Heat Week” with a press conference in a Cambridge, Mass., hotel where the group invited alumni, faculty, and environmental advocates to pressure the university to divest from fossil fuels.

“Fossil fuels have been the energy that we have used since hominids came on this earth, but we do not need to be Neanderthals in terms of understanding what we need to do moving forward,” Gina McCarthy, a professor at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health who was also a former EPA administrator, said at the press conference. “It is time for Harvard and other Ivy League schools to divest. They know better. Get over it. Move forward.”

Heat Week was launched by Divest Harvard in 2015 when students and some faculty members blockaded the university’s oldest surviving building for a week, occupied the Harvard Alumni Association headquarters for two days, and blockaded University Hall.

Want the latest institutional investment industry
news and insights? Sign up for CIO newsletters.

According to student group Harvard Undergraduates for Environmental Justice, this year’s Heat Week is a series of events intended to draw attention to the severity of the climate crisis, in addition to raising the call for Harvard to divest from the fossil fuel industry. The group is hosting two civil disobedience trainings, three panels featuring local, institutional, and global speakers, and four public actions. The week’s activities will end with a rally called “Flood Harvard” in Harvard Yard on April 26.

However, Harvard University President Lawrence Bacow has maintained that the university’s endowment should not divest from fossil fuel companies, but should instead engage them to foster change.

In a March interview with student newspaper The Harvard Crimson, Bacow reiterated Harvard’s policy against divestment, saying the endowment is not, has never been, and should not be a vehicle for social change.

“The endowment exists to support the institution, to support our students, and to support our faculty,” Bacow said. “And it was on those terms that our donors have entrusted the resources to us. They’ve said here, here are these resources which we want you to invest to support these activities—not to accomplish some other ends.”

And this week in an emailed statement to the Crimson, university spokesperson Jonathan Swain reiterated Harvard’s stance on the issue.

“The university’s position, as it has stated previously, is that it should not use the endowment to achieve political ends, or particular policy ends,” Swain wrote.

Related Stories:

Harvard ‘Not Pleased’ with 2018 Performance

Harvard Overseer Resigns over Fossil Fuel Investments

Tags: , , , ,

Kentucky Left to Try, Try Again on Pension Overhaul

State senator, the running mate of GOP Gov. Bevin, vows to come up with an alternative to bill Bevin vetoed.

Kentucky’s 2019 legislative session came up short in its bid to enact a long-overdue pension reform because the governor vetoed it a couple of weeks ago. But an ally of Republican Gov. Matt Bevin is crafting another version.

“We’re looking at trying to make sure that we have something that’s going to make actuarial sense,” said Sen. Ralph Alvarado, who is Bevin’s running mate this year as the governor seeks another term. Alvarado told WKMS.org that he wants something that will “take care of those who are already retired” and guarantee they keep their benefits.

Bevin has called a special session of the legislature to deal with this issue on July 1, the start of Kentucky’s new fiscal year. Alvarado wants to get a general consensus on the new pension bill, in hopes the measure will have a smoother path next time.

The senator kept a tight lid on details, but thinks universities will like it because it protects their buyout options. “It might be a little bit different of a structure,” he said. He also wants to protect the state’s risk while it provides for its current retirees and creates a new structure for new hires.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

Bevin vetoed the version that the GOP-controlled General Assembly passed, citing fiscal concerns. The move by lawmakers would have given the state’s 118 quasi-governmental agencies, which include regional universities and health centers, permission to leave the pension system and dodge cost increases. Bevin objected by saying the departures would ultimately hurt Kentucky’s finances, losing $800 million.

Considering Kentucky is already $37 billion deep in pension debt, another near-billion wouldn’t be doing it any favors.

Had it passed, the exiting agencies would have been able to create their own retirement plans, but with a catch: If pension payouts were 30 days late, the state could then take over and restructure however it saw fit. Employees hired from 2014 on would also see reduced benefits.

One complication: On July 1, the agencies’ contribution rates to the state fund will change from roughly 49% of an employees’ salary to about 84%. Bevin did that last year, also, but it was nixed by lawmakers less than 24 hours after it started. Nothing was passed.

Alavarado said there is a “bit of a time crunch” to call the session as lawmakers prep for summer plans, but he thinks the legislature will pull something together.

The senator could not be reached for original comment. Bevin was unable to be reached for comment.

 

Related Stories:

Kentucky Bill Would Allow Institutions to Leave Troubled Retirement System

Kentucky Lawmakers Return to Tackle Retirement System Mess

Kentucky Lawmakers Balk at Bid to Push Through Thwarted Pension Overhaul

Tags: , , ,

«